[The use of complementary and alternative therapies in Germany - a systematic review of nationwide surveys].

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-24 DOI:10.1159/000360917
Klaus Linde, Anna Alscher, Clara Friedrichs, Stefanie Joos, Antonius Schneider
{"title":"[The use of complementary and alternative therapies in Germany - a systematic review of nationwide surveys].","authors":"Klaus Linde,&nbsp;Anna Alscher,&nbsp;Clara Friedrichs,&nbsp;Stefanie Joos,&nbsp;Antonius Schneider","doi":"10.1159/000360917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this systematic review we aimed to summarize surveys investigating the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods in the general German population and by physicians and lay practitioners. Nationwide surveys (using random, panel, or quota sampling methods) published since 1993 investigating the CAM use among the population and healthcare providers in Germany were identified through searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, citation screening, and expert contacts. In addition we collected publicly available data from official nationwide health statistics and market statistics. 16 surveys of the general adult population and 4 surveys among physicians met inclusion criteria. The use of CAM among general population in the previous years varied between 40 and 62%. General practitioners and orthopedic specialists in private practice seem to provide CAM therapies widely and more frequently than other physician groups, with herbal medicine and chirotherapy being the most frequently used treatments. We could not identify any surveys of lay practitioners. The available surveys provide clear evidence of the widespread use of CAM methods in Germany both by the general population and by physicians. In recent years the use of CAM methods does not seem to increase any longer; for some methods (particularly herbal remedies) the use seems to be declining.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360917","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In this systematic review we aimed to summarize surveys investigating the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods in the general German population and by physicians and lay practitioners. Nationwide surveys (using random, panel, or quota sampling methods) published since 1993 investigating the CAM use among the population and healthcare providers in Germany were identified through searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, citation screening, and expert contacts. In addition we collected publicly available data from official nationwide health statistics and market statistics. 16 surveys of the general adult population and 4 surveys among physicians met inclusion criteria. The use of CAM among general population in the previous years varied between 40 and 62%. General practitioners and orthopedic specialists in private practice seem to provide CAM therapies widely and more frequently than other physician groups, with herbal medicine and chirotherapy being the most frequently used treatments. We could not identify any surveys of lay practitioners. The available surveys provide clear evidence of the widespread use of CAM methods in Germany both by the general population and by physicians. In recent years the use of CAM methods does not seem to increase any longer; for some methods (particularly herbal remedies) the use seems to be declining.

[德国补充和替代疗法的使用——对全国调查的系统回顾]。
在这个系统的回顾,我们的目的是总结调查使用补充和替代医学(CAM)方法在普通德国人群和医生和非专业从业者。1993年以来发表的全国性调查(使用随机、小组或配额抽样方法)通过PubMed、Google Scholar、Google、引文筛选和专家联系搜索确定了德国人口和医疗保健提供者中CAM使用情况。此外,我们从官方的全国卫生统计和市场统计中收集了公开可用的数据。16项普通成人调查和4项医生调查符合纳入标准。前几年,普通人群中辅助治疗的使用率在40%到62%之间。全科医生和私人诊所的骨科专家似乎比其他医生群体更广泛、更频繁地提供辅助替代疗法,其中草药和脊椎按摩疗法是最常用的治疗方法。我们无法确定对非专业从业者的任何调查。现有的调查提供了明确的证据,证明在德国,普通人群和医生都广泛使用辅助医学方法。近年来,CAM方法的使用似乎不再增加;对于某些方法(特别是草药疗法),使用量似乎正在下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信