Effectiveness of the P3-speller in brain-computer interfaces for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in neuroengineering Pub Date : 2014-05-01 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneng.2014.00012
Mauro Marchetti, Konstantinos Priftis
{"title":"Effectiveness of the P3-speller in brain-computer interfaces for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mauro Marchetti,&nbsp;Konstantinos Priftis","doi":"10.3389/fneng.2014.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A quarter of century ago, Farwell and Donchin (1988) described their mental prosthesis for \"talking off the top of your head.\" This innovative communication system, later named P3-speller, has been the most investigated and tested brain-computer interface (BCI) system, to date. A main goal of the research on P3-spellers was the development of an effective assistive device for patients with severe motor diseases. Among these patients are those affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS patients have become a target population in P3-speller (and more generally in BCI) research. The P3-speller relies on the visual sensory modality, and it can be controlled by requiring users to actively move their eyes. Unfortunately, eye-movement control is usually not spared in the last stages of ALS, and, then, it is definitively lost in the case of complete paralysis. We reviewed the literature on ALS patients tested by means of P3-speller systems. Our aim was to investigate the evidence available to date of the P3-spellers effectiveness in ALS patients. To address this goal, a meta-analytic approach was adopted. The pooled classification accuracy performance, among retrieved studies, was about 74%. This estimation, however, was affected by significant heterogeneity and inconsistency among studies. This fact makes this percentage estimation (i.e., 74%) unreliable. Nowadays, the conclusion is that the initial hopes posed on P3-speller for ALS patients have not been met yet. In addition, no trials in which the P3-speller has been compared to current assistive technologies for communication (e.g., eye-trackers) are available. In conclusion, further studies are required to obtain a reliable index of P3-speller effectiveness in ALS. Furthermore, comparisons of P3-speller systems with the available assistive technologies are needed to assess the P3-speller usefulness with non-completely paralyzed ALS-patients. </p>","PeriodicalId":73093,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2014.00012","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

A quarter of century ago, Farwell and Donchin (1988) described their mental prosthesis for "talking off the top of your head." This innovative communication system, later named P3-speller, has been the most investigated and tested brain-computer interface (BCI) system, to date. A main goal of the research on P3-spellers was the development of an effective assistive device for patients with severe motor diseases. Among these patients are those affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS patients have become a target population in P3-speller (and more generally in BCI) research. The P3-speller relies on the visual sensory modality, and it can be controlled by requiring users to actively move their eyes. Unfortunately, eye-movement control is usually not spared in the last stages of ALS, and, then, it is definitively lost in the case of complete paralysis. We reviewed the literature on ALS patients tested by means of P3-speller systems. Our aim was to investigate the evidence available to date of the P3-spellers effectiveness in ALS patients. To address this goal, a meta-analytic approach was adopted. The pooled classification accuracy performance, among retrieved studies, was about 74%. This estimation, however, was affected by significant heterogeneity and inconsistency among studies. This fact makes this percentage estimation (i.e., 74%) unreliable. Nowadays, the conclusion is that the initial hopes posed on P3-speller for ALS patients have not been met yet. In addition, no trials in which the P3-speller has been compared to current assistive technologies for communication (e.g., eye-trackers) are available. In conclusion, further studies are required to obtain a reliable index of P3-speller effectiveness in ALS. Furthermore, comparisons of P3-speller systems with the available assistive technologies are needed to assess the P3-speller usefulness with non-completely paralyzed ALS-patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者脑机接口中p3拼写器的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
四分之一个世纪以前,Farwell和Donchin(1988)将他们的精神假肢描述为“不经思考就能说话”。这个创新的通信系统,后来被命名为p3拼写器,是迄今为止研究和测试最多的脑机接口(BCI)系统。研究p3拼写者的一个主要目标是为患有严重运动疾病的患者开发一种有效的辅助设备。这些患者中有肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者。肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者已成为p3拼写研究(以及更普遍的脑机接口研究)的目标人群。p3拼写器依赖于视觉感官模式,它可以通过要求用户主动移动眼睛来控制。不幸的是,在ALS的最后阶段,眼球运动控制通常不能幸免,然后,在完全瘫痪的情况下,它就完全失去了控制。我们回顾了用p3拼写系统测试ALS患者的文献。我们的目的是调查迄今为止关于p3拼写器在ALS患者中的有效性的证据。为了实现这一目标,采用了元分析方法。在检索到的研究中,汇总的分类准确率约为74%。然而,这一估计受到研究间显著异质性和不一致性的影响。这个事实使得这个百分比估计(即74%)不可靠。目前的结论是,最初对ALS患者的p3拼写希望尚未实现。此外,目前还没有将p3拼写器与当前的通信辅助技术(如眼球追踪器)进行比较的试验。总之,需要进一步的研究来获得一个可靠的p3拼写器在ALS中的有效性指标。此外,需要将p3拼写系统与现有辅助技术进行比较,以评估p3拼写系统对非完全瘫痪的als患者的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信