Modeling per capita state health expenditure variation: state-level characteristics matter.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2013-11-26 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.003.04.a03
Gigi Cuckler, Andrea Sisko
{"title":"Modeling per capita state health expenditure variation: state-level characteristics matter.","authors":"Gigi Cuckler,&nbsp;Andrea Sisko","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.003.04.a03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we describe the methods underlying the econometric model developed by the Office of the Actuary in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, to explain differences in per capita total personal health care spending by state, as described in Cuckler, et al. (2011). Additionally, we discuss many alternative model specifications to provide additional insights for valid interpretation of the model.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>We study per capita personal health care spending as measured by the State Health Expenditures, by State of Residence for 1991-2009, produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Office of the Actuary. State-level demographic, health status, economic, and health economy characteristics were gathered from a variety of U.S. government sources, such as the Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Centers for Disease Control, the American Hospital Association, and HealthLeaders-InterStudy.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>State-specific factors, such as income, health care capacity, and the share of elderly residents, are important factors in explaining the level of per capita personal health care spending variation among states over time. However, the slow-moving nature of health spending per capita and close relationships among state-level factors create inefficiencies in modeling this variation, likely resulting in incorrectly estimated standard errors. In addition, we find that both pooled and fixed effects models primarily capture cross-sectional variation rather than period-specific variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011645/pdf/mmrr2013-003-04-a03.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.04.a03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective: In this paper, we describe the methods underlying the econometric model developed by the Office of the Actuary in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, to explain differences in per capita total personal health care spending by state, as described in Cuckler, et al. (2011). Additionally, we discuss many alternative model specifications to provide additional insights for valid interpretation of the model.

Data source: We study per capita personal health care spending as measured by the State Health Expenditures, by State of Residence for 1991-2009, produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Office of the Actuary. State-level demographic, health status, economic, and health economy characteristics were gathered from a variety of U.S. government sources, such as the Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Centers for Disease Control, the American Hospital Association, and HealthLeaders-InterStudy.

Principal findings: State-specific factors, such as income, health care capacity, and the share of elderly residents, are important factors in explaining the level of per capita personal health care spending variation among states over time. However, the slow-moving nature of health spending per capita and close relationships among state-level factors create inefficiencies in modeling this variation, likely resulting in incorrectly estimated standard errors. In addition, we find that both pooled and fixed effects models primarily capture cross-sectional variation rather than period-specific variation.

Abstract Image

各州人均卫生支出变化建模:州级特征很重要。
目的:在本文中,我们描述了由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心精算师办公室开发的计量经济模型的基本方法,以解释各州人均个人医疗保健支出总额的差异,如Cuckler等人(2011)所述。此外,我们还讨论了许多可选的模型规范,以提供对模型的有效解释的额外见解。数据来源:我们研究了1991-2009年各州卫生支出衡量的人均个人卫生保健支出,由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的精算师办公室编制。州级人口、健康状况、经济和卫生经济特征从各种美国政府来源收集,如人口普查局、经济分析局、疾病控制中心、美国医院协会和healthleaders interstudy。主要发现:各州的具体因素,如收入、医疗保健能力和老年居民的比例,是解释各州人均个人医疗保健支出水平随时间变化的重要因素。然而,人均卫生支出的缓慢变化性质和州一级因素之间的密切关系导致对这种变化进行建模的效率低下,可能导致不正确估计标准误差。此外,我们发现混合效应和固定效应模型都主要捕获了横截面变化,而不是特定时期的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信