Questioning regulation of two-pore channels by NAADP.

Jonathan S Marchant, Sandip Patel
{"title":"Questioning regulation of two-pore channels by NAADP.","authors":"Jonathan S Marchant,&nbsp;Sandip Patel","doi":"10.1166/msr.2013.1027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>NAADP is a potent Ca<sup>2+</sup> mobilizing messenger [1-3]. Since its discovery in 1995 [4] a considerable volume of literature has shown that NAADP couples cell stimulation to endolysosomal Ca<sup>2+</sup> release and thereby the regulation of many cellular functions [5]. However definition of its molecular mechanism of action has proved far from easy. Since 2009, a consensus emerged as several independent groups coalesced upon the two-pore channel (TPC) family as NAADP-activated channels essential for Ca<sup>2+</sup> release from endolysosomal Ca<sup>2+</sup> stores [6-8]. However this view has been recently challenged by data clearly showing that TPCs function as Na<sup>+</sup>-selective channels apparently insensitive to NAADP [9;10]. Given the two fundamental characteristics defining an ion channel comprise the opening stimulus and the nature of the permeant ions, scrutiny of these seeming irreconcilable viewpoints is essential. The purpose of this commentary is to distil the remaining consensus while interrogating these divergent viewpoints. From this analysis, critical experimental needs are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":74176,"journal":{"name":"Messenger (Los Angeles, Calif. : Print)","volume":"2 2","pages":"113-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1166/msr.2013.1027","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Messenger (Los Angeles, Calif. : Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/msr.2013.1027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

NAADP is a potent Ca2+ mobilizing messenger [1-3]. Since its discovery in 1995 [4] a considerable volume of literature has shown that NAADP couples cell stimulation to endolysosomal Ca2+ release and thereby the regulation of many cellular functions [5]. However definition of its molecular mechanism of action has proved far from easy. Since 2009, a consensus emerged as several independent groups coalesced upon the two-pore channel (TPC) family as NAADP-activated channels essential for Ca2+ release from endolysosomal Ca2+ stores [6-8]. However this view has been recently challenged by data clearly showing that TPCs function as Na+-selective channels apparently insensitive to NAADP [9;10]. Given the two fundamental characteristics defining an ion channel comprise the opening stimulus and the nature of the permeant ions, scrutiny of these seeming irreconcilable viewpoints is essential. The purpose of this commentary is to distil the remaining consensus while interrogating these divergent viewpoints. From this analysis, critical experimental needs are identified.

质疑NAADP对双孔通道的调控作用。
NAADP是一种有效的Ca2+动员信使[1-3]。自1995年发现以来[4],大量文献表明NAADP将细胞刺激与内溶酶体Ca2+释放结合,从而调节许多细胞功能[5]。然而,其分子作用机制的定义远非易事。自2009年以来,人们一致认为,双孔通道(TPC)家族是naadp激活的通道,是Ca2+从内溶酶体Ca2+库释放所必需的[6-8]。然而,这一观点最近受到了挑战,数据清楚地表明,TPCs作为Na+选择性通道,显然对NAADP不敏感[9;10]。考虑到离子通道的两个基本特征包括开放刺激和渗透的性质,对这些看似不可调和的观点进行审查是必要的。这篇评论的目的是在质疑这些分歧观点的同时,提炼出剩余的共识。根据这一分析,确定了关键的实验需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信