Drug utilization in emergency medicine department at a tertiary care teaching hospital: A prospective study.

Preksha A Barot, Supriya D Malhotra, Devang A Rana, Varsha J Patel, Kamlesh P Patel
{"title":"Drug utilization in emergency medicine department at a tertiary care teaching hospital: A prospective study.","authors":"Preksha A Barot,&nbsp;Supriya D Malhotra,&nbsp;Devang A Rana,&nbsp;Varsha J Patel,&nbsp;Kamlesh P Patel","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.121650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The practice of emergency medicine has the primary mission of evaluating, managing and providing treatment to those patients with unexpected injury or illness. Instituting appropriate therapy is necessary for safety of the patients and to decrease mortality and morbidity. The objectives were to study the drug utilization pattern and direct cost of therapy in emergency medicine department of a tertiary care teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data of the patients admitted to emergency medicine department was collected prospectively for 48 h from the time of admission over 2 months. The prescriptions were analyzed for drug use pattern and direct cost of therapy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients received 1635 drugs with the mean of 9.99 ± 2.55 drugs/patient. Most common diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome 35 (21.79%). Ondansetron 135 (86.53%) was most frequently prescribed drug followed by pantoprazole 133 (85.25%) and furosemide 68 (43.58%). Amongst antimicrobials ceftriaxone 51 (32.69%) was the most commonly prescribed drug. Direct cost of treatment per patient for the first 48 h was र 4051 ± 1641.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ondansetron and pantoprazole were the most commonly prescribed drugs in the emergency department. However, their use in all patients was not justified. Polypharmacy was prevalent. A closer look at the rationality of therapy would help in highlighting issues involved and would be helpful to authorities in deciding prescribing policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"4 4","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/79/JBCP-4-78.PMC3979265.pdf","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.121650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Background and objectives: The practice of emergency medicine has the primary mission of evaluating, managing and providing treatment to those patients with unexpected injury or illness. Instituting appropriate therapy is necessary for safety of the patients and to decrease mortality and morbidity. The objectives were to study the drug utilization pattern and direct cost of therapy in emergency medicine department of a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Materials and methods: Data of the patients admitted to emergency medicine department was collected prospectively for 48 h from the time of admission over 2 months. The prescriptions were analyzed for drug use pattern and direct cost of therapy was calculated.

Results: A total of 156 patients received 1635 drugs with the mean of 9.99 ± 2.55 drugs/patient. Most common diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome 35 (21.79%). Ondansetron 135 (86.53%) was most frequently prescribed drug followed by pantoprazole 133 (85.25%) and furosemide 68 (43.58%). Amongst antimicrobials ceftriaxone 51 (32.69%) was the most commonly prescribed drug. Direct cost of treatment per patient for the first 48 h was र 4051 ± 1641.

Conclusion: Ondansetron and pantoprazole were the most commonly prescribed drugs in the emergency department. However, their use in all patients was not justified. Polypharmacy was prevalent. A closer look at the rationality of therapy would help in highlighting issues involved and would be helpful to authorities in deciding prescribing policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

某三级教学医院急诊科药物利用的前瞻性研究。
背景和目的:急诊医学实践的主要任务是评估、管理和提供治疗那些意外伤害或疾病的患者。制定适当的治疗方法对于患者的安全以及降低死亡率和发病率是必要的。目的探讨某三级教学医院急诊科的药物利用模式及治疗直接费用。材料与方法:前瞻性收集急诊医学科收治患者自入院后2个月内48 h的资料。分析处方用药方式,计算直接治疗费用。结果156例患者共使用药物1635种,平均(9.99±2.55)种/例。最常见的诊断是急性冠脉综合征35(21.79%)。用药最多的是昂丹司琼135(86.53%),其次是泮托拉唑133(85.25%)和呋塞米68(43.58%)。在抗菌药物中,头孢曲松51(32.69%)是最常用的处方药物。每位患者前48小时的直接治疗成本为4051±1641。结论:昂丹司琼和泮托拉唑是急诊科最常用的药物。然而,它们在所有患者中的应用并不合理。多药并存的现象很普遍。仔细研究治疗的合理性将有助于突出所涉及的问题,并有助于当局决定处方政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信