Antimicrobial resistance pattern in a tertiary care hospital: An observational study.

Revathy Saravanan, Vinod Raveendaran
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance pattern in a tertiary care hospital: An observational study.","authors":"Revathy Saravanan,&nbsp;Vinod Raveendaran","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.118797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The number of organisms developing resistance to commonly used antibiotics is increasing among the various generations. The exact national scenario of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is not known in India owing to the absence of a central monitoring agency.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify the group of organisms developing resistance, to know the classes of drugs against, which resistance has emerged and to assess the possible factors that can favor the development of AMR so that antibiotic policy can be formulated for the proper and effective use of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>An observational study was conducted for a period of 1 year from August 2011 to July 2012 in a tertiary care hospital in Pondicherry.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Data regarding culture and sensitivity of the organisms isolated from different sources such as urine, blood, wound swab/pus, stool, sputum and tracheal aspirations were collected from the records of the Microbiology Department. Sample processing, identification of organisms to the genus and/or species level and antimicrobial sensitivity were carried out as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines on the 999 samples received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 999 samples, 125 (12.5%) showed significant growth of organisms exhibiting resistance to either single or multiple drugs. Out of 84 (67.2%) in-patients and 41 (32.8%) out-patient samples, Escherichia was the most common organism isolated with a total of 41 (32.8%), followed by Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 26 (20.8%), Klebsiella 25 (20%), Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus 17 (13.6%), Pseudomonas 10 (8%), Proteus 2 (1.6%), 1 (0.8%) each of Citrobacter and Enterococci. Maximum resistance was observed with commonly used first line antimicrobials such as co-trimoxazole, ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxyclav, fluoroquinolones, third generation cephalosporins and nalidixic acid. Least resistant or highly sensitive were amikacin, nitrofurantoin, gentamycin and doxycycline among the gram-negative bacteria. Macrolides, clindamycin, gentamycin, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin were the most sensitive antimicrobials against the gram-positive bacteria. Lack of knowledge on the consequences of inappropriate use of antibiotics was exhibited by 63% of subjects in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMR was more with hospital acquired organisms and against commonly used antibiotics that are available since long period. Variation of resistance and sensitivity pattern with time and geographical location is identified. Periodic AMR monitoring and rotation of antibiotics are suggested to restrict further emergence of resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"4 3","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/7b/JBCP-4-56.PMC3979270.pdf","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.118797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Context: The number of organisms developing resistance to commonly used antibiotics is increasing among the various generations. The exact national scenario of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is not known in India owing to the absence of a central monitoring agency.

Aims: The aim of this study is to identify the group of organisms developing resistance, to know the classes of drugs against, which resistance has emerged and to assess the possible factors that can favor the development of AMR so that antibiotic policy can be formulated for the proper and effective use of antibiotics.

Settings and design: An observational study was conducted for a period of 1 year from August 2011 to July 2012 in a tertiary care hospital in Pondicherry.

Subjects and methods: Data regarding culture and sensitivity of the organisms isolated from different sources such as urine, blood, wound swab/pus, stool, sputum and tracheal aspirations were collected from the records of the Microbiology Department. Sample processing, identification of organisms to the genus and/or species level and antimicrobial sensitivity were carried out as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines on the 999 samples received.

Results: Out of 999 samples, 125 (12.5%) showed significant growth of organisms exhibiting resistance to either single or multiple drugs. Out of 84 (67.2%) in-patients and 41 (32.8%) out-patient samples, Escherichia was the most common organism isolated with a total of 41 (32.8%), followed by Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 26 (20.8%), Klebsiella 25 (20%), Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus 17 (13.6%), Pseudomonas 10 (8%), Proteus 2 (1.6%), 1 (0.8%) each of Citrobacter and Enterococci. Maximum resistance was observed with commonly used first line antimicrobials such as co-trimoxazole, ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxyclav, fluoroquinolones, third generation cephalosporins and nalidixic acid. Least resistant or highly sensitive were amikacin, nitrofurantoin, gentamycin and doxycycline among the gram-negative bacteria. Macrolides, clindamycin, gentamycin, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin were the most sensitive antimicrobials against the gram-positive bacteria. Lack of knowledge on the consequences of inappropriate use of antibiotics was exhibited by 63% of subjects in our study.

Conclusions: AMR was more with hospital acquired organisms and against commonly used antibiotics that are available since long period. Variation of resistance and sensitivity pattern with time and geographical location is identified. Periodic AMR monitoring and rotation of antibiotics are suggested to restrict further emergence of resistance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三级护理医院的抗菌药物耐药模式:一项观察性研究。
背景:在不同的世代中,对常用抗生素产生耐药性的生物体数量正在增加。由于缺乏中央监测机构,目前尚不清楚印度国内抗菌素耐药性的确切情况。目的:本研究的目的是确定产生耐药性的微生物群体,了解对哪些药物产生耐药性,并评估可能有利于抗菌素耐药性发展的因素,以便制定抗生素政策,正确有效地使用抗生素。背景和设计:本研究于2011年8月至2012年7月在本地治里的一家三级保健医院进行了为期1年的观察性研究。对象和方法:从不同来源(如尿液、血液、伤口拭子/脓液、粪便、痰液和气管分泌物)分离的微生物培养和敏感性数据从微生物科的记录中收集。我们按照临床及实验室标准学会的指引,对收到的999个样本进行样本处理、鉴定属及/或种级别的生物及抗菌药物敏感性。结果:在999份样本中,125份(12.5%)显示出对单一或多种药物耐药的微生物显著生长。在84例(67.2%)住院患者和41例(32.8%)门诊患者的样本中,最常见的是埃希菌,共41例(32.8%),其次是甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌26例(20.8%),克雷伯菌25例(20%),耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌17例(13.6%),假单胞菌10例(8%),变形杆菌2例(1.6%),柠檬酸杆菌和肠球菌各1例(0.8%)。常用一线抗菌药如复方新诺明、氨苄西林、阿莫西林、阿莫克拉夫、氟喹诺酮类药物、第三代头孢菌素和萘啶酸耐药性最大。革兰氏阴性菌中耐药最少或高敏感的是阿米卡星、呋喃妥因、庆大霉素和强力霉素。大环内酯类、克林霉素、庆大霉素、呋喃妥英、万古霉素对革兰氏阳性菌最敏感。在我们的研究中,63%的受试者对不适当使用抗生素的后果缺乏了解。结论:抗菌素耐药性多发生在医院获得性微生物和长期使用的常用抗生素上。确定了电阻和灵敏度随时间和地理位置的变化规律。建议定期监测抗菌素耐药性并轮换使用抗生素,以限制耐药性的进一步出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信