CHIP reporting in the CPS.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2012-07-31 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.002.03.b01
Jacob Klerman, Michael R Plotzke, Mike Davern
{"title":"CHIP reporting in the CPS.","authors":"Jacob Klerman,&nbsp;Michael R Plotzke,&nbsp;Mike Davern","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.002.03.b01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the quality of the Current Population Survey's (CPS) Child Health Insurance Program (CHIP) data.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Linked 2000-2004 Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) and the 2001-2004 CPS.</p><p><strong>Data collection methods: </strong>Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provided the Census Bureau with its MSIS file. The Census Bureau linked the MSIS to the CPS data within its secure data analysis facilities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We compared responses to the CPS health insurance items with Medicaid and CHIP status according to the MSIS.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>CHIP reporting in the CPS is unreliable. Only 10-30 percent of those with CHIP (but not Medicaid) report this type of coverage in the CPS. Many with CHIP report Medicaid coverage, so the reporting error for a Medicaid-CHIP composite is smaller, but still substantial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of the CPS CHIP information renders it effectively unusable for health policy analysis. Analysts should consider using a Medicaid-CHIP composite for CPS-based analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006394/pdf/mmrr2012-002-03-b01.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.03.b01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality of the Current Population Survey's (CPS) Child Health Insurance Program (CHIP) data.

Data sources: Linked 2000-2004 Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) and the 2001-2004 CPS.

Data collection methods: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provided the Census Bureau with its MSIS file. The Census Bureau linked the MSIS to the CPS data within its secure data analysis facilities.

Study design: We compared responses to the CPS health insurance items with Medicaid and CHIP status according to the MSIS.

Principal findings: CHIP reporting in the CPS is unreliable. Only 10-30 percent of those with CHIP (but not Medicaid) report this type of coverage in the CPS. Many with CHIP report Medicaid coverage, so the reporting error for a Medicaid-CHIP composite is smaller, but still substantial.

Conclusions: The quality of the CPS CHIP information renders it effectively unusable for health policy analysis. Analysts should consider using a Medicaid-CHIP composite for CPS-based analyses.

CPS中的CHIP报告。
目的:评价当前人口调查(CPS)儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)数据的质量。数据来源:链接2000-2004医疗补助统计信息系统(MSIS)和2001-2004 CPS。数据收集方法:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心向人口普查局提供其MSIS文件。人口普查局将MSIS与其安全数据分析设施内的CPS数据联系起来。研究设计:根据MSIS,我们比较了CPS健康保险项目与Medicaid和CHIP状态的反应。主要发现:CPS中的CHIP报告是不可靠的。只有10- 30%的CHIP患者(不包括医疗补助)在CPS中报告了这种类型的覆盖范围。许多CHIP报告医疗补助覆盖范围,因此医疗补助-CHIP组合的报告错误较小,但仍然很大。结论:CPS CHIP信息的质量使其无法有效地用于卫生政策分析。分析人员应考虑在基于cps的分析中使用医疗补助- chip组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信