Statistical uncertainty in the Medicare shared savings program.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2012-12-28 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a04
Derek DeLia, Donald Hoover, Joel C Cantor
{"title":"Statistical uncertainty in the Medicare shared savings program.","authors":"Derek DeLia,&nbsp;Donald Hoover,&nbsp;Joel C Cantor","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze statistical risks facing CMS and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) under the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculate the probability that shared savings formulas lead to inappropriate payment, payment denial, and/or financial penalties, assuming that ACOs generate real savings in Medicare spending ranging from 0-10%. We also calculate expected payments from CMS to ACOs under these scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The probability of an incorrect outcome is heavily dependent on ACO enrollment size. For example, in the MSSP two-sided model, an ACO with 5,000 enrollees that keeps spending constant faces a 0.24 probability of being inappropriately rewarded for savings and a 0.26 probability of paying an undeserved penalty for increased spending. For an ACO with 50,000 enrollees, both of these probabilities of incorrect outcomes are equal to 0.02. The probability of inappropriate payment denial declines as real ACO savings increase. Still, for ACOs with 5,000 patients, the probability of denial is at least 0.15 even when true savings are 5-7%. Depending on ACO size and the real ACO savings rate, expected ACO payments vary from $115,000 to $35.3 million.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis indicates there may be greater statistical uncertainty in the MSSP than previously recognized. CMS and ACOs will have to consider this uncertainty in their financial, administrative, and care management planning. We also suggest analytic strategies that can be used to refine ACO payment formulas in the longer term to ensure that the MSSP (and other ACO initiatives that will be influenced by it) work as efficiently as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006477/pdf/mmrr2012-002-04-a04.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: Analyze statistical risks facing CMS and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) under the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP).

Methods: We calculate the probability that shared savings formulas lead to inappropriate payment, payment denial, and/or financial penalties, assuming that ACOs generate real savings in Medicare spending ranging from 0-10%. We also calculate expected payments from CMS to ACOs under these scenarios.

Results: The probability of an incorrect outcome is heavily dependent on ACO enrollment size. For example, in the MSSP two-sided model, an ACO with 5,000 enrollees that keeps spending constant faces a 0.24 probability of being inappropriately rewarded for savings and a 0.26 probability of paying an undeserved penalty for increased spending. For an ACO with 50,000 enrollees, both of these probabilities of incorrect outcomes are equal to 0.02. The probability of inappropriate payment denial declines as real ACO savings increase. Still, for ACOs with 5,000 patients, the probability of denial is at least 0.15 even when true savings are 5-7%. Depending on ACO size and the real ACO savings rate, expected ACO payments vary from $115,000 to $35.3 million.

Discussion: Our analysis indicates there may be greater statistical uncertainty in the MSSP than previously recognized. CMS and ACOs will have to consider this uncertainty in their financial, administrative, and care management planning. We also suggest analytic strategies that can be used to refine ACO payment formulas in the longer term to ensure that the MSSP (and other ACO initiatives that will be influenced by it) work as efficiently as possible.

医疗保险共享储蓄计划的统计不确定性。
目的:分析医疗保险共享储蓄计划(MSSP)下CMS和责任医疗机构(ACOs)面临的统计风险。方法:我们计算共享储蓄公式导致不适当支付、拒绝支付和/或经济处罚的概率,假设ACOs在医疗保险支出中产生0-10%的实际节省。我们还计算了在这些情况下CMS对ACOs的预期支付。结果:不正确结果的概率在很大程度上取决于ACO的入组规模。例如,在MSSP双边模型中,一个拥有5000名参保者的ACO,如果保持支出不变,其储蓄获得不适当奖励的概率为0.24,而增加支出支付不应有惩罚的概率为0.26。对于拥有50,000名注册者的ACO,这两个错误结果的概率都等于0.02。当实际ACO储蓄增加时,不适当的付款拒绝概率下降。尽管如此,对于拥有5,000名患者的ACOs,即使真正节省了5-7%,拒绝的概率至少为0.15。根据ACO的规模和实际ACO储蓄率,预计ACO付款从11.5万美元到3530万美元不等。讨论:我们的分析表明,在MSSP中可能存在比以前认识到的更大的统计不确定性。CMS和ACOs将不得不在他们的财务、行政和护理管理计划中考虑这种不确定性。我们还建议分析策略,可用于在较长期内完善蚁群管理支付公式,以确保MSSP(以及将受其影响的其他蚁群管理计划)尽可能有效地工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信