Assessing the usability of MAX 2008 encounter data for comprehensive managed care.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2013-03-28 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.003.01.b01
Vivian L H Byrd, Allison Hedley Dodd
{"title":"Assessing the usability of MAX 2008 encounter data for comprehensive managed care.","authors":"Vivian L H Byrd,&nbsp;Allison Hedley Dodd","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.003.01.b01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As growing numbers of Medicaid enrollees receive health benefits through comprehensive managed care, researchers and policymakers seeking to understand the service use of these enrollees must rely on encounter data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the availability, completeness, and quality of physician, clinic, and outpatient service (OT), inpatient (IP), and prescription drug (RX) encounter claims to judge the usability of the 2008 Medicaid Analytical eXtract (MAX) encounter data.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>2008 MAX encounter data, which are derived from the state-submitted Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) files.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each basis of eligibility (BOE) group in each state that had at least ten percent participation in comprehensive managed care and submitted at least 200 encounter claims, the completeness and quality of the OT, IP, and RX encounter data were evaluated using comparison metrics created from the full-benefit, non-dual fee-for-service (FFS) population across all states with substantial FFS participation. Data that met both the completeness and quality criteria were considered usable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The completeness and the quality of the encounter data were high. The encounter data were considered usable for a least one BOE category for 22 of the 25 states that submitted OT encounter data, 20 of the 24 states that submitted IP data, and 13 of the 15 states that submitted RX data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most states that have comprehensive managed care plans are reporting OT, IP, and RX encounter data. Of those data, the majority are complete and of comparable quality to FFS data for adults, children, the disabled, and aged populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983721/pdf/mmrr2013-003-01-b01.pdf","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.01.b01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: As growing numbers of Medicaid enrollees receive health benefits through comprehensive managed care, researchers and policymakers seeking to understand the service use of these enrollees must rely on encounter data.

Objective: To assess the availability, completeness, and quality of physician, clinic, and outpatient service (OT), inpatient (IP), and prescription drug (RX) encounter claims to judge the usability of the 2008 Medicaid Analytical eXtract (MAX) encounter data.

Data: 2008 MAX encounter data, which are derived from the state-submitted Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) files.

Methods: For each basis of eligibility (BOE) group in each state that had at least ten percent participation in comprehensive managed care and submitted at least 200 encounter claims, the completeness and quality of the OT, IP, and RX encounter data were evaluated using comparison metrics created from the full-benefit, non-dual fee-for-service (FFS) population across all states with substantial FFS participation. Data that met both the completeness and quality criteria were considered usable.

Results: The completeness and the quality of the encounter data were high. The encounter data were considered usable for a least one BOE category for 22 of the 25 states that submitted OT encounter data, 20 of the 24 states that submitted IP data, and 13 of the 15 states that submitted RX data.

Conclusions: Most states that have comprehensive managed care plans are reporting OT, IP, and RX encounter data. Of those data, the majority are complete and of comparable quality to FFS data for adults, children, the disabled, and aged populations.

评估综合管理式医疗的MAX 2008就诊数据的可用性。
背景:随着越来越多的医疗补助计划参保人通过综合管理医疗获得健康福利,研究人员和政策制定者试图了解这些参保人的服务使用情况,必须依赖于遭遇数据。目的:评估医生、诊所和门诊服务(OT)、住院病人(IP)和处方药(RX)遭遇索赔的可用性、完整性和质量,以判断2008年医疗补助分析提取(MAX)遭遇数据的可用性。数据:2008年MAX遭遇数据,来源于各州提交的医疗补助统计信息系统(MSIS)文件。方法:对于每个州的资格基础(BOE)组,至少有10%的人参与了综合管理式医疗,并提交了至少200次就诊索赔,使用从所有参与了大量FFS的州的完全受益、非双重收费服务(FFS)人口中创建的比较指标来评估OT、IP和RX就诊数据的完整性和质量。同时满足完整性和质量标准的数据被认为是可用的。结果:就诊资料的完整性和质量均较高。在提交OT遭遇数据的25个州中有22个州,提交IP数据的24个州中有20个州,提交RX数据的15个州中有13个州,遭遇数据被认为至少可用于一个BOE类别。结论:大多数拥有综合管理医疗计划的州都报告了OT、IP和RX就诊数据。在这些数据中,大多数是完整的,质量与成人、儿童、残疾人和老年人的FFS数据相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信