Medicare readmission rates showed meaningful decline in 2012.

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2013-05-28 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.003.02.b01
Geoffrey Gerhardt, Alshadye Yemane, Peter Hickman, Allison Oelschlaeger, Eric Rollins, Niall Brennan
{"title":"Medicare readmission rates showed meaningful decline in 2012.","authors":"Geoffrey Gerhardt,&nbsp;Alshadye Yemane,&nbsp;Peter Hickman,&nbsp;Allison Oelschlaeger,&nbsp;Eric Rollins,&nbsp;Niall Brennan","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.003.02.b01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Descriptive analysis of 30-day, all-cause hospital readmission rate patterns from 2007-2012.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Medicare FFS beneficiaries experiencing at least one acute inpatient hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Chronic Condition Data Warehouse claims, we estimate unadjusted, monthly, readmission rates for the nation, within the Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions (HRR), and compare participating and non-participating hospitals in the Partnership for Patients (P4P) program (overall and by number of inpatient beds at each facility).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2007 through 2011, the national 30-day, all-cause, hospital readmission rate averaged 19 percent. During calendar year 2012, the readmission rate averaged 18.4 percent. Of the 306 HRRs, rates in 166 HRRs fell by between 1 and 5 percent, while rates dropped by more than 5 percent in 73 HRRs, with the largest reduction in Longview, Texas. Rates increased by more than 1 percent in only 30 HRRs, with the largest increase in Bloomington, Illinois. Readmission rates at hospitals participating in the P4P program have been, on average, consistently lower than the rates at non-participating hospitals within all size categories except for the very smallest and largest hospitals, but rates at both participant and non-participant hospitals fell in 2012.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although claims data are not yet final for 2012, our analysis indicates that hospital readmission rates for all Medicare FFS beneficiaries dropped noticeably during the year. The reasons behind the apparent reduction are not yet clear and merit further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983725/pdf/mmrr2013-003-02-b01.pdf","citationCount":"139","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.02.b01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 139

Abstract

Objective: Descriptive analysis of 30-day, all-cause hospital readmission rate patterns from 2007-2012.

Population: Medicare FFS beneficiaries experiencing at least one acute inpatient hospital stay.

Methods: Using Chronic Condition Data Warehouse claims, we estimate unadjusted, monthly, readmission rates for the nation, within the Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions (HRR), and compare participating and non-participating hospitals in the Partnership for Patients (P4P) program (overall and by number of inpatient beds at each facility).

Results: From 2007 through 2011, the national 30-day, all-cause, hospital readmission rate averaged 19 percent. During calendar year 2012, the readmission rate averaged 18.4 percent. Of the 306 HRRs, rates in 166 HRRs fell by between 1 and 5 percent, while rates dropped by more than 5 percent in 73 HRRs, with the largest reduction in Longview, Texas. Rates increased by more than 1 percent in only 30 HRRs, with the largest increase in Bloomington, Illinois. Readmission rates at hospitals participating in the P4P program have been, on average, consistently lower than the rates at non-participating hospitals within all size categories except for the very smallest and largest hospitals, but rates at both participant and non-participant hospitals fell in 2012.

Discussion: Although claims data are not yet final for 2012, our analysis indicates that hospital readmission rates for all Medicare FFS beneficiaries dropped noticeably during the year. The reasons behind the apparent reduction are not yet clear and merit further investigation.

2012年,医保再入院率出现了显著下降。
目的:对2007-2012年住院30天全因再入院率进行描述性分析。人口:医疗保险FFS受益人至少有一次急性住院。方法:使用慢性病数据仓库索赔,我们估计了达特茅斯医院转诊地区(HRR)内全国未经调整的每月再入院率,并比较了参与和未参与患者伙伴关系(P4P)计划的医院(总体和每家医院的住院床位数量)。结果:从2007年到2011年,全国30天的全因再入院率平均为19%。在2012日历年,再入学率平均为18.4%。在306个hrr中心中,166个hrr中心的比率下降了1%到5%,而73个hrr中心的比率下降了5%以上,其中降幅最大的是德克萨斯州朗维尤。只有30个州的税率增长超过1%,其中增幅最大的是伊利诺伊州的布卢明顿市。除了最小和最大的医院外,参与P4P计划的医院的再入院率平均一直低于所有规模类别的非参与医院,但参与医院和非参与医院的再入院率在2012年都有所下降。讨论:虽然2012年的索赔数据尚未最终确定,但我们的分析表明,所有医疗保险FFS受益人的住院再入院率在这一年中显著下降。明显减少的原因尚不清楚,值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信