[The use of two-stage algorithm in the diagnosis of patients with low levels of Clostridium difficile toxins A/B in feces confirmed by using enzyme immunoassay].

Grazyna Nurzyńska, Hanna Pituch, Renata Kamola, Ewa Swoboda Kopeć
{"title":"[The use of two-stage algorithm in the diagnosis of patients with low levels of Clostridium difficile toxins A/B in feces confirmed by using enzyme immunoassay].","authors":"Grazyna Nurzyńska,&nbsp;Hanna Pituch,&nbsp;Renata Kamola,&nbsp;Ewa Swoboda Kopeć","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a serious problem in hospitalized patients. Rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis is the key to reducing of CDI. The suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of many commercial enzyme immunoassays have limited their utility. The aim of this study was analysis of faecal samples obtained from patients with clinical evidence of CDI, with non-detectable or questionable result of toxins A/B C. difficile recognized by toxins A/B EIA test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-step algorithm for diagnostics of C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients with non-detectable or questionable result of toxins A/B C. difficile confirmed by C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Wampole, TOX A/B II, TechLab, USA) was used. Sixty nine faecal samples obtained from patients with nosocomial diarrhea were retested. All faecal samples were cultured on selective medium CLO C. difficile (BioMérieux, Francja). The positive samples on selective medium were tested by using Real Time-PCR (Xpert CD assay, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Xpert CD assay is a real time multiplex PCR that can be used to detect toxigenic C. difficile strains and differentiate the C. difficile presumptive NAP1/BI/027 strain. All results when faecal samples were negative in culture growth on selective medium and result of EIA test were questionable was confirmed by use a RT-PCR test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 69 faecal samples 56 were negative for toxins A/B using EIA test and 13 gave questionable results. By anaerobic culture 60 of 69 specimens yielded C. difficile isolates. Among 69 faecal samples 55 were positive using RT-PCR. Thirty four (62%) of patients was infected by presumptive C. difficile NAP1/BI/027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C. difficile testing by use of culture and Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) increases diagnostic yield in a hospital patients with non-detectable or low level of toxins A/B in stool samples of patients infected by toxigenic C. difficile strains including presumptive C. difficile NAP1/BI/027.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"65 4","pages":"263-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a serious problem in hospitalized patients. Rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis is the key to reducing of CDI. The suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of many commercial enzyme immunoassays have limited their utility. The aim of this study was analysis of faecal samples obtained from patients with clinical evidence of CDI, with non-detectable or questionable result of toxins A/B C. difficile recognized by toxins A/B EIA test.

Methods: A two-step algorithm for diagnostics of C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients with non-detectable or questionable result of toxins A/B C. difficile confirmed by C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Wampole, TOX A/B II, TechLab, USA) was used. Sixty nine faecal samples obtained from patients with nosocomial diarrhea were retested. All faecal samples were cultured on selective medium CLO C. difficile (BioMérieux, Francja). The positive samples on selective medium were tested by using Real Time-PCR (Xpert CD assay, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Xpert CD assay is a real time multiplex PCR that can be used to detect toxigenic C. difficile strains and differentiate the C. difficile presumptive NAP1/BI/027 strain. All results when faecal samples were negative in culture growth on selective medium and result of EIA test were questionable was confirmed by use a RT-PCR test.

Results: Among 69 faecal samples 56 were negative for toxins A/B using EIA test and 13 gave questionable results. By anaerobic culture 60 of 69 specimens yielded C. difficile isolates. Among 69 faecal samples 55 were positive using RT-PCR. Thirty four (62%) of patients was infected by presumptive C. difficile NAP1/BI/027.

Conclusions: C. difficile testing by use of culture and Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) increases diagnostic yield in a hospital patients with non-detectable or low level of toxins A/B in stool samples of patients infected by toxigenic C. difficile strains including presumptive C. difficile NAP1/BI/027.

[两阶段算法在酶免疫法确诊粪便中难辨梭菌毒素A/B水平较低患者诊断中的应用]。
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是住院患者的一个严重问题。快速准确的实验室诊断是降低CDI的关键。许多商业酶免疫测定的次优灵敏度和特异性限制了它们的效用。本研究的目的是分析从具有CDI临床证据的患者中获得的粪便样本,这些患者的毒素A/B艰难梭菌无法通过毒素A/B EIA测试检测到或结果可疑。方法:采用两步算法诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI),对艰难梭菌酶免疫测定(EIA)证实的A/B艰难梭菌毒素检测结果未检出或可疑的患者进行诊断(Wampole, TOX A/B II, TechLab, USA)。对医院性腹泻患者的69份粪便样本进行重新检测。所有粪便样本在选择性培养基CLO艰难梭菌(biomacrieux, Francja)上培养。选择培养基上的阳性样品采用Real - Time-PCR (Xpert CD assay, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)检测。Xpert CD法是一种实时多重PCR技术,可用于检测产毒艰难梭菌菌株和区分艰难梭菌推定菌株NAP1/BI/027。当粪便样本在选择性培养基上培养生长呈阴性且EIA试验结果有疑问时,均采用RT-PCR试验证实。结果:69份粪便标本中,毒素A/B阴性56份,可疑13份。通过厌氧培养,69个标本中有60个分离出难辨梭菌。69份粪便标本中,55份经RT-PCR检测呈阳性。34例(62%)患者被推测为难辨梭菌NAP1/BI/027感染。结论:使用培养和实时PCR (RT-PCR)检测艰难梭菌可提高医院患者粪便样本中毒素a /B水平低或未检测到的诊断率,这些患者感染了产毒艰难梭菌菌株,包括推测的艰难梭菌NAP1/BI/027。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信