[In vitro activity of sitafloxacin against clinical isolates in 2012].

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2013-12-01
Ayako Amano, Kaoru Matsuzaki, Naoko Kishi, Hideaki Koyama, Miyuki Hasegawa, Fumiaki Ikeda, Takuyuki Matsumoto, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Yukihiro Okutani
{"title":"[In vitro activity of sitafloxacin against clinical isolates in 2012].","authors":"Ayako Amano,&nbsp;Kaoru Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Naoko Kishi,&nbsp;Hideaki Koyama,&nbsp;Miyuki Hasegawa,&nbsp;Fumiaki Ikeda,&nbsp;Takuyuki Matsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroki Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Yukihiro Okutani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro activity of sitafloxacin (STFX) and various oral antimicrobial agents against bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens between January and December 2012, at different healthcare facilities in Japan was evaluated. A total of 1,620 isolates including aerobic and anaerobic organisms were available for the susceptibility testing using the microbroth dilution methods recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The minimum inhibitory concentration of STFX at which 90% of isolates (MIC90) was 0.5 microg/mL for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and was 2 times lower than that of garenoxacin (GRNX), 4 times lower than that of moxifloxacin (MFLX), and 16 times lower than that of levofloxacin (LVFX). STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae at 0.06 microg/mL or less. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.03 microg/mL and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 4 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. Against Streptococcus pyogenes, the MIC90 of STFX was 0.06 microg/mL and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 8 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 2 microg/mL for Enterococcus faecalis, and was 4 times lower than that of GRNX, 8 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for Escherichia coli was 2 microg/mL, and the MIC90(s) of other 10 species of Enterobacteriaceae which were the lowest values of the quinolones tested ranged from 0.03 to 1 microg/mL. The MIC90 of STFX for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from urinary infections was 4 microg/mL and was 32 times lower than those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from respiratory infections was 4 microg/mL and was 8 to 16 times lower than those of GRNX, MFLX, and LVFX. STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Haemophilus influenzae at 0.004 microg/mL or less, and was 4 times lower than that of GRNX, 16 times lower than that of MFLX, and 8 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.015 microg/mL for Moraxella catarrhalis, and was equal to that of GRNX, 4 times lower than those of MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90(s) of STFX ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 microg/mL for all the species of anaerobic bacteria and were the lowest values of all the antimicrobial agents tested. In conclusion, the activity of STFX against Gram-positive cocci was comparable or superior to those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. STFX showed the most potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria of all the antimicrobial agents tested in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro activity of sitafloxacin (STFX) and various oral antimicrobial agents against bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens between January and December 2012, at different healthcare facilities in Japan was evaluated. A total of 1,620 isolates including aerobic and anaerobic organisms were available for the susceptibility testing using the microbroth dilution methods recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The minimum inhibitory concentration of STFX at which 90% of isolates (MIC90) was 0.5 microg/mL for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and was 2 times lower than that of garenoxacin (GRNX), 4 times lower than that of moxifloxacin (MFLX), and 16 times lower than that of levofloxacin (LVFX). STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae at 0.06 microg/mL or less. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.03 microg/mL and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 4 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. Against Streptococcus pyogenes, the MIC90 of STFX was 0.06 microg/mL and was 2 times lower than that of GRNX, 8 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 2 microg/mL for Enterococcus faecalis, and was 4 times lower than that of GRNX, 8 times lower than that of MFLX, and 32 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for Escherichia coli was 2 microg/mL, and the MIC90(s) of other 10 species of Enterobacteriaceae which were the lowest values of the quinolones tested ranged from 0.03 to 1 microg/mL. The MIC90 of STFX for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from urinary infections was 4 microg/mL and was 32 times lower than those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX for P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from respiratory infections was 4 microg/mL and was 8 to 16 times lower than those of GRNX, MFLX, and LVFX. STFX inhibited the growth of all the isolates of Haemophilus influenzae at 0.004 microg/mL or less, and was 4 times lower than that of GRNX, 16 times lower than that of MFLX, and 8 times lower than that of LVFX. The MIC90 of STFX was 0.015 microg/mL for Moraxella catarrhalis, and was equal to that of GRNX, 4 times lower than those of MFLX and LVFX. The MIC90(s) of STFX ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 microg/mL for all the species of anaerobic bacteria and were the lowest values of all the antimicrobial agents tested. In conclusion, the activity of STFX against Gram-positive cocci was comparable or superior to those of GRNX, MFLX and LVFX. STFX showed the most potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria of all the antimicrobial agents tested in this study.

[2012年西他沙星对临床分离株的体外活性分析]。
对2012年1月至12月在日本不同医疗机构的临床标本中回收的细菌分离株进行了西他沙星(STFX)和各种口服抗菌药物的体外活性评估。采用临床与实验室标准协会推荐的微肉汤稀释法,对包括好氧和厌氧微生物在内的1620株菌株进行了药敏试验。STFX对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC90)为0.5 μ g/mL,比加兰诺沙星(GRNX)低2倍,比莫西沙星(MFLX)低4倍,比左氧氟沙星(LVFX)低16倍。STFX在0.06 μ g/mL或更低浓度下抑制所有肺炎链球菌分离株的生长。STFX的MIC90为0.03 μ g/mL,比GRNX低2倍,比MFLX低4倍,比LVFX低32倍。STFX对化脓性链球菌的MIC90为0.06 μ g/mL,比GRNX低2倍,比MFLX低8倍,比LVFX低32倍。STFX对粪肠球菌的MIC90为2 μ g/mL,比GRNX低4倍,比MFLX低8倍,比LVFX低32倍。STFX对大肠杆菌的MIC90为2 μ g/mL,其余10种肠杆菌的MIC90(s)在0.03 ~ 1 μ g/mL之间,为喹诺酮类药物的最低值。STFX对尿路感染铜绿假单胞菌分离物的MIC90为4 μ g/mL,比GRNX、MFLX和LVFX低32倍。STFX对铜绿假单胞菌呼吸道感染分离物的MIC90为4 μ g/mL,比GRNX、MFLX和LVFX低8 ~ 16倍。STFX对所有流感嗜血杆菌分离株的抑制作用在0.004 μ g/mL以下,比GRNX低4倍,比MFLX低16倍,比LVFX低8倍。STFX对卡他莫拉菌的MIC90为0.015 μ g/mL,与GRNX相当,比MFLX和LVFX低4倍。STFX对所有厌氧菌的MIC90(s)范围为0.03 ~ 0.25 μ g/mL,是所有抗菌药物中最低的。综上所述,STFX对革兰氏阳性球菌的活性与GRNX、MFLX和LVFX相当或优于GRNX。STFX对革兰氏阴性菌和厌氧菌的抑菌活性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信