Analysis of film reject rate in the diagnostic x-ray facility of a tertiary health institution in Benin, Nigeria.

C U Eze, B O Olajide, C C Ohagwu, L C Abonyi
{"title":"Analysis of film reject rate in the diagnostic x-ray facility of a tertiary health institution in Benin, Nigeria.","authors":"C U Eze,&nbsp;B O Olajide,&nbsp;C C Ohagwu,&nbsp;L C Abonyi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Film rejects analysis (FRA) as part of quality assurance tests in radiography services, is carried out periodically to identify causes of film rejection and to proffer solutions to ameliorate such problems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study was carried out to estimate film rejection rate in a tertiary health facility in Benin, Nigeria and also to identify causes of film rejection in the centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was carried out within 6 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the local committee on research and ethics before the study commenced. Only routine x-ray procedures were included in the study. Four x-ray rooms and four radiographers with equal training and job experience were selected for the study. Different boxes labeled for each room were used to daily collect rejected films.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall rejection rate was 6.7%. Improper exposure caused the highest rate of repeats (> 12% in the old x-ray rooms). Highest rejection rates (31%) were found in the old x-ray rooms. Paranasal sinuses examination accounted for highest rejection rate (25%) among all routine x-ray investigations considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rejection rate found was within recommended limits.Obsolete but poorly maintained x-machines layed major roles in overall film rejection rate in the centre. X ray of paranasal sinuses was challenging to radiographers observed. Radiographers should embrace CPD while obsolete x-ray equipments found in the centre should be scrapped to further reduce film reject rate in the centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":19202,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian quarterly journal of hospital medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"54-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian quarterly journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Film rejects analysis (FRA) as part of quality assurance tests in radiography services, is carried out periodically to identify causes of film rejection and to proffer solutions to ameliorate such problems.

Objective: The study was carried out to estimate film rejection rate in a tertiary health facility in Benin, Nigeria and also to identify causes of film rejection in the centre.

Methods: This prospective study was carried out within 6 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the local committee on research and ethics before the study commenced. Only routine x-ray procedures were included in the study. Four x-ray rooms and four radiographers with equal training and job experience were selected for the study. Different boxes labeled for each room were used to daily collect rejected films.

Results: Overall rejection rate was 6.7%. Improper exposure caused the highest rate of repeats (> 12% in the old x-ray rooms). Highest rejection rates (31%) were found in the old x-ray rooms. Paranasal sinuses examination accounted for highest rejection rate (25%) among all routine x-ray investigations considered.

Conclusion: Rejection rate found was within recommended limits.Obsolete but poorly maintained x-machines layed major roles in overall film rejection rate in the centre. X ray of paranasal sinuses was challenging to radiographers observed. Radiographers should embrace CPD while obsolete x-ray equipments found in the centre should be scrapped to further reduce film reject rate in the centre.

尼日利亚贝宁某三级卫生机构诊断x射线设施胶片废品率分析。
背景:胶片拒收分析(FRA)作为放射照相服务质量保证测试的一部分,定期进行,以确定胶片拒收的原因,并提供改善这些问题的解决方案。目的:本研究旨在估计尼日利亚贝宁一家三级医疗机构的电影拒绝率,并确定该中心拒绝率的原因。方法:本前瞻性研究在6个月内进行。在研究开始前,已获得当地研究和伦理委员会的伦理批准。研究中只包括常规x光检查。四间x光室及四名受过同等训练及工作经验的放射技师参与研究。每个房间都贴上了不同的标签,每天用来收集不合格的胶片。结果:总排斥率为6.7%。曝光不当导致重复率最高(旧x光室> 12%)。旧x光室拒绝率最高(31%)。在所有常规x线检查中,鼻窦检查的排异率最高(25%)。结论:拒绝率在推荐范围内。过时但维护不善的x-machine是导致电影整体不良率的主要原因。鼻窦的X线观察对放射技师来说是一个挑战。放射技师应接受持续专业进修课程,而在中心内发现的过时的x光设备应予以报废,以进一步降低中心内的胶片弃置率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信