What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?

International journal of molecular imaging Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-12-28 DOI:10.1155/2013/476786
Priya Bhosale, Aparna Balachandran, Raghu Vikram, Chitra Viswanathan, Homer Macapinlac, Eric Rohren, Ramanujan Prativadi
{"title":"What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?","authors":"Priya Bhosale,&nbsp;Aparna Balachandran,&nbsp;Raghu Vikram,&nbsp;Chitra Viswanathan,&nbsp;Homer Macapinlac,&nbsp;Eric Rohren,&nbsp;Ramanujan Prativadi","doi":"10.1155/2013/476786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2-26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2-10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies. </p>","PeriodicalId":89157,"journal":{"name":"International journal of molecular imaging","volume":"2013 ","pages":"476786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/476786","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/476786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2-26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2-10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在接受PET/CT检查的其他恶性肿瘤患者中,前列腺FDG意外摄取的临床意义是什么?
目的。目的:探讨无前列腺癌病史的患者在接受FDG- pet /CT诊断其他原发性恶性肿瘤分期时,前列腺异常FDG摄取的临床意义。方法。回顾性检索FDG- pet /CT研究,以确定前列腺中意外异常FDG摄取的患者,并进行随后的活检。确定了26例患者。检查图像以确定前列腺内摄取模式(局灶性或弥漫性)和最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)。记录PSA和Gleason评分。结果:15/26(58%)的患者发现前列腺癌。Gleason评分在6到9.9之间。摄取模式(局灶性与弥漫性)或SUVmax均无统计学差异。血清PSA水平与癌症(范围,2-26.8 ng;平均值,10.2 ng)和无癌患者(范围,2-10.5 ng;平均值,2.2 ng),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.007, Wilcoxon秩和检验)。结论。前列腺摄取异常的患者有58%的可能性患隐匿性前列腺癌。在血清PSA水平升高的情况下,应怀疑前列腺摄取异常,并应咨询泌尿科医生;然而,它与潜在的侵袭性恶性肿瘤患者无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书