[Reproducibility of Fim2 and Fim3 antigens determination in Bordetella pertussis by serotyping method].

Monika Zawadka, Bozena Moskala, Iwona Letowska, Ewa Mosiej, Katarzyna Krysztopa-Grzybowska, Anna Lutyńska
{"title":"[Reproducibility of Fim2 and Fim3 antigens determination in Bordetella pertussis by serotyping method].","authors":"Monika Zawadka,&nbsp;Bozena Moskala,&nbsp;Iwona Letowska,&nbsp;Ewa Mosiej,&nbsp;Katarzyna Krysztopa-Grzybowska,&nbsp;Anna Lutyńska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serotyping is a commonly used method to characterize the presence of Fimbriae 2 and 3 in Bordetella pertussis strains for epidemiological purposes and optimal choice of strain composition of the pertussis whole-cell vaccine. Monoclonal antisera against Fim2 and Fim3 are recommended to be used for microplate serotyping instead ofpolyclonal. Reliable evaluation offimbriae expressed by B. pertussis strains influence interpretation of vaccine-driven strain evolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the impact of tests conditions on the reproducibility of serotyping, results of serotyping based on a standardized protocol for microplate agglutination with monoclonal antisera performed in three different accredited laboratories were compared. For the study isolates of three vaccine strains of B. pertussis deposited within seed lot system originating from different liofilization lots were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lack of the complete agreement on serotyping results among three labs might relates to the differences of media used, subjective reading, test conditions, and specificity of the reagents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serotyping results should be interpreted with caution and the type of media and culture conditions used should be precisely recommended after validation studies. Inconsistent results should be confirmed using an alternative technique, eg. ELISA or by reference laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"65 3","pages":"171-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Serotyping is a commonly used method to characterize the presence of Fimbriae 2 and 3 in Bordetella pertussis strains for epidemiological purposes and optimal choice of strain composition of the pertussis whole-cell vaccine. Monoclonal antisera against Fim2 and Fim3 are recommended to be used for microplate serotyping instead ofpolyclonal. Reliable evaluation offimbriae expressed by B. pertussis strains influence interpretation of vaccine-driven strain evolution.

Methods: To evaluate the impact of tests conditions on the reproducibility of serotyping, results of serotyping based on a standardized protocol for microplate agglutination with monoclonal antisera performed in three different accredited laboratories were compared. For the study isolates of three vaccine strains of B. pertussis deposited within seed lot system originating from different liofilization lots were compared.

Results: Lack of the complete agreement on serotyping results among three labs might relates to the differences of media used, subjective reading, test conditions, and specificity of the reagents.

Conclusions: Serotyping results should be interpreted with caution and the type of media and culture conditions used should be precisely recommended after validation studies. Inconsistent results should be confirmed using an alternative technique, eg. ELISA or by reference laboratory.

[血清分型法测定百日咳杆菌Fim2和Fim3抗原的重复性]。
简介:血清分型是一种常用的方法,用于描述百日咳博德特拉菌株中菌毛2和菌毛3的存在,用于流行病学目的和百日咳全细胞疫苗菌株组成的最佳选择。推荐使用单克隆抗Fim2和Fim3血清进行微孔板血清分型,而不是多克隆。百日咳菌株表达的菌膜的可靠评价影响疫苗驱动菌株进化的解释。方法:为了评估测试条件对血清分型可重复性的影响,比较了三个不同认可实验室基于单克隆抗血清微孔板凝集标准化方案的血清分型结果。本研究比较了3株百日咳疫苗株在来自不同生物滤池的种子批次系统内的分离株。结果:三个实验室对血清分型结果缺乏完全一致,可能与所用培养基、主观读数、测试条件和试剂特异性的差异有关。结论:血清分型结果应谨慎解释,在验证研究后应准确推荐使用的培养基类型和培养条件。不一致的结果应采用另一种技术进行确认。ELISA或参比实验室检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信