The production-protection nexus: How political-economic processes influence prospects for transformative change in human-wildlife interactions

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Robert Fletcher , Kate Massarella , Katia M.P.M.B. Ferraz , Wilhelm A. Kiwango , Sanna Komi , Mathew B. Mabele , Silvio Marchini , Anja Nygren , Laila T. Sandroni , Peter S. Alagona , Alex McInturff
{"title":"The production-protection nexus: How political-economic processes influence prospects for transformative change in human-wildlife interactions","authors":"Robert Fletcher ,&nbsp;Kate Massarella ,&nbsp;Katia M.P.M.B. Ferraz ,&nbsp;Wilhelm A. Kiwango ,&nbsp;Sanna Komi ,&nbsp;Mathew B. Mabele ,&nbsp;Silvio Marchini ,&nbsp;Anja Nygren ,&nbsp;Laila T. Sandroni ,&nbsp;Peter S. Alagona ,&nbsp;Alex McInturff","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article advances a novel analytical framework for investigating the influence of political-economic processes in human-wildlife interactions (HWI) to support efforts to transform wildlife conservation governance. To date, the majority of research and advocacy addressing HWI focuses on micro-level processes, while even the small body of existing literature exploring social dimensions of such interactions has largely neglected attention to political-economic forces. This is consonant with efforts to transform conservation policy and practice more broadly, which tend to emphasize “circular” change within current political-economic structures rather than “axial” transformation aiming to transcend these structures themselves. Our analysis thus advances understanding of potential for axial transformation in HWI via confrontation with, and “unmaking” of, constraining political-economic structures. It does so through cross-site analysis of conservation policy and practice in relation to three apex predator species (lions, jaguars and wolves) in varied geographic and socio-political contexts, grounded in qualitative ethnographic study within the different sites by members of an international research team. We explore how the relative power of different political-economic interests within each case influences how the animals are perceived and valued, and how this in turn influences conservation interventions and their impact on HWI within these spaces. We term this analysis of the “production-protection nexus” (the interrelation between process of resource extraction and conservation, respectively) in rural landscapes. We emphasize importance of attention to this formative nexus both within and across specific locales in growing global efforts to transform situations of human-wildlife conflict into less contentious coexistence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102723"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378023000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article advances a novel analytical framework for investigating the influence of political-economic processes in human-wildlife interactions (HWI) to support efforts to transform wildlife conservation governance. To date, the majority of research and advocacy addressing HWI focuses on micro-level processes, while even the small body of existing literature exploring social dimensions of such interactions has largely neglected attention to political-economic forces. This is consonant with efforts to transform conservation policy and practice more broadly, which tend to emphasize “circular” change within current political-economic structures rather than “axial” transformation aiming to transcend these structures themselves. Our analysis thus advances understanding of potential for axial transformation in HWI via confrontation with, and “unmaking” of, constraining political-economic structures. It does so through cross-site analysis of conservation policy and practice in relation to three apex predator species (lions, jaguars and wolves) in varied geographic and socio-political contexts, grounded in qualitative ethnographic study within the different sites by members of an international research team. We explore how the relative power of different political-economic interests within each case influences how the animals are perceived and valued, and how this in turn influences conservation interventions and their impact on HWI within these spaces. We term this analysis of the “production-protection nexus” (the interrelation between process of resource extraction and conservation, respectively) in rural landscapes. We emphasize importance of attention to this formative nexus both within and across specific locales in growing global efforts to transform situations of human-wildlife conflict into less contentious coexistence.

生产-保护关系:政治-经济过程如何影响人类与野生动物相互作用的变革前景
本文提出了一种新的分析框架,用于研究人类与野生动物相互作用(HWI)中政治经济过程的影响,以支持野生动物保护治理的转变。迄今为止,大多数关于HWI的研究和倡导都集中在微观层面的过程上,而即使是探索这种相互作用的社会层面的现有文献也在很大程度上忽视了对政治经济力量的关注。这与更广泛地改变保护政策和实践的努力是一致的,这些政策和实践倾向于强调当前政治经济结构内的“循环”变化,而不是旨在超越这些结构本身的“轴向”转变。因此,我们的分析促进了对HWI通过对抗和“破坏”限制性政治经济结构而实现轴向转变的可能性的理解。它通过对不同地理和社会政治背景下与三种顶级掠食者物种(狮子、美洲虎和狼)有关的保护政策和实践的跨地点分析来实现这一目标,并以一个国际研究小组成员在不同地点进行的定性人种学研究为基础。我们探讨了在每个案例中不同的政治经济利益的相对力量如何影响动物的感知和价值,以及这反过来如何影响保护干预措施及其对这些空间中的HWI的影响。我们将这种分析称为乡村景观中的“生产-保护关系”(分别是资源开采和保护过程之间的相互关系)。我们强调,在全球不断努力将人类与野生动物的冲突转变为较少争议的共存的过程中,关注特定地区内部和地区之间这种形成性联系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信