A systematic review of the utility of residual vein obstruction studies in primary and secondary venous thrombosis.

Thrombosis Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-11-19 DOI:10.1155/2013/247913
Murali Janakiram, Matthew Sullivan, Marina Shcherba, Shuang Guo, Henny H Billett
{"title":"A systematic review of the utility of residual vein obstruction studies in primary and secondary venous thrombosis.","authors":"Murali Janakiram, Matthew Sullivan, Marina Shcherba, Shuang Guo, Henny H Billett","doi":"10.1155/2013/247913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Residual vein obstruction (RVO), the persistence of venous thrombosis with time and often after anticoagulation, may indicate a systemic prothrombotic condition. Prior studies have shown varying efficacy in using RVO as a risk factor for future venous thromboembolic (VTE) recurrence. Methods. To assess whether positive RVO imaging predicts recurrent VTE events, we performed a meta-analysis on studies in which patients with documented VTEs, anticoagulated for a minimum of 4 weeks, had repeat sonography to assess RVO and were subsequently followed for recurrent events. Results. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria: 3531 patient VTE events with 3474 evaluable results were analyzed. The presence of RVO was associated with recurrence in all VTE (OR 1.93; 95% CI: 1.29, 2.89) and secondary VTE (OR 2.78; 95% CI: 1.41, 5.5) but not for primary VTE (OR 1.35; 95% CI: 0.87, 2.08). When cancer patients were eliminated from the secondary VTE group, there was no longer a significant association of RVO with VTE recurrence (OR 1.73; 95% CI: 0.81, 3.67) while in the subset of cancer patients, presence of RVO was associated with an increase in VTE recurrence risk (OR 5.14; 95% CI: 1.59, 16.65, P < 0.006). Conclusions. We conclude that the presence of RVO is associated with recurrence in secondary VTE but not in primary VTE and that association may be driven by the subset with cancer. </p>","PeriodicalId":75222,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis","volume":"2013 ","pages":"247913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/247913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Residual vein obstruction (RVO), the persistence of venous thrombosis with time and often after anticoagulation, may indicate a systemic prothrombotic condition. Prior studies have shown varying efficacy in using RVO as a risk factor for future venous thromboembolic (VTE) recurrence. Methods. To assess whether positive RVO imaging predicts recurrent VTE events, we performed a meta-analysis on studies in which patients with documented VTEs, anticoagulated for a minimum of 4 weeks, had repeat sonography to assess RVO and were subsequently followed for recurrent events. Results. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria: 3531 patient VTE events with 3474 evaluable results were analyzed. The presence of RVO was associated with recurrence in all VTE (OR 1.93; 95% CI: 1.29, 2.89) and secondary VTE (OR 2.78; 95% CI: 1.41, 5.5) but not for primary VTE (OR 1.35; 95% CI: 0.87, 2.08). When cancer patients were eliminated from the secondary VTE group, there was no longer a significant association of RVO with VTE recurrence (OR 1.73; 95% CI: 0.81, 3.67) while in the subset of cancer patients, presence of RVO was associated with an increase in VTE recurrence risk (OR 5.14; 95% CI: 1.59, 16.65, P < 0.006). Conclusions. We conclude that the presence of RVO is associated with recurrence in secondary VTE but not in primary VTE and that association may be driven by the subset with cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

残余静脉阻塞研究在原发性和继发性静脉血栓中的实用性系统回顾。
背景。残余静脉阻塞(RVO)是指静脉血栓随着时间的推移而持续存在,通常是在抗凝治疗之后,这可能预示着一种全身性的血栓前状态。先前的研究表明,将残余静脉阻塞作为未来静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)复发的风险因素效果不一。方法。为了评估 RVO 成像阳性是否能预测 VTE 复发,我们对一些研究进行了荟萃分析,在这些研究中,有记录的 VTE 患者在接受至少 4 周的抗凝治疗后,重复接受超声波检查以评估 RVO,并在随后对复发情况进行随访。结果。13项研究符合纳入标准:分析了 3531 例患者的 VTE 事件和 3474 项可评估结果。在所有 VTE(OR 1.93;95% CI:1.29, 2.89)和继发性 VTE(OR 2.78;95% CI:1.41, 5.5)中,RVO 的存在与复发有关,但与原发性 VTE 无关(OR 1.35;95% CI:0.87, 2.08)。如果将癌症患者从继发性 VTE 组中剔除,RVO 与 VTE 复发的关系不再显著(OR 1.73;95% CI:0.81-3.67),而在癌症患者子集中,RVO 的存在与 VTE 复发风险的增加有关(OR 5.14;95% CI:1.59-16.65,P <0.006)。结论我们得出的结论是,RVO的存在与继发性VTE复发有关,但与原发性VTE复发无关,这种关联可能是由癌症亚组驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信