Sizing the cannabis market: a demand-side and user-specific approach in seven European countries.

Margriet van Laar, Tom Frijns, Franz Trautmann, Linda Lombi
{"title":"Sizing the cannabis market: a demand-side and user-specific approach in seven European countries.","authors":"Margriet van Laar,&nbsp;Tom Frijns,&nbsp;Franz Trautmann,&nbsp;Linda Lombi","doi":"10.2174/1874473706666131205152835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Demand-based estimates of total cannabis consumption rarely consider differences among different user types and variation across countries. To describe cannabis consumption patterns and estimate annual consumption for different user types across EU Member States, a web survey in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and United Kingdom (England & Wales) collected data on cannabis use patterns from 3,922 persons who had consumed cannabis at least once in the past year. They were classified into four groups based on their number of use days in the past 12 months: infrequent users or chippers (<11 days), occasional users (11-50 days), regular users (51-250 days) and intensive users (>250 days). User type specific data on typical amounts consumed were matched with data on numbers of users per user type estimated from existing population surveys, taking differences in mode of consumption, age and gender into account. Estimates were supplemented with data from populations of problem users to compensate for under coverage. Results showed remarkably consistent differences among user groups across countries. Both the average number of units consumed per typical use day and the average amount of cannabis consumed per unit increased across user types of increasing frequency of use. In all countries except Portugal, intensive users formed the smallest group of cannabis users but were responsible for the largest part of total annual cannabis consumption. Annual cannabis consumption varied across countries but confidence intervals were wide. Results are compared with previous estimates and discussed in the context of improving estimation methods. </p>","PeriodicalId":72730,"journal":{"name":"Current drug abuse reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug abuse reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473706666131205152835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Demand-based estimates of total cannabis consumption rarely consider differences among different user types and variation across countries. To describe cannabis consumption patterns and estimate annual consumption for different user types across EU Member States, a web survey in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and United Kingdom (England & Wales) collected data on cannabis use patterns from 3,922 persons who had consumed cannabis at least once in the past year. They were classified into four groups based on their number of use days in the past 12 months: infrequent users or chippers (<11 days), occasional users (11-50 days), regular users (51-250 days) and intensive users (>250 days). User type specific data on typical amounts consumed were matched with data on numbers of users per user type estimated from existing population surveys, taking differences in mode of consumption, age and gender into account. Estimates were supplemented with data from populations of problem users to compensate for under coverage. Results showed remarkably consistent differences among user groups across countries. Both the average number of units consumed per typical use day and the average amount of cannabis consumed per unit increased across user types of increasing frequency of use. In all countries except Portugal, intensive users formed the smallest group of cannabis users but were responsible for the largest part of total annual cannabis consumption. Annual cannabis consumption varied across countries but confidence intervals were wide. Results are compared with previous estimates and discussed in the context of improving estimation methods.

确定大麻市场的规模:七个欧洲国家的需求方和针对用户的办法。
以需求为基础的大麻消费总量估计很少考虑到不同使用者类型之间的差异和各国之间的差异。为了描述大麻消费模式并估计欧盟成员国不同用户类型的年消费量,在保加利亚、捷克共和国、意大利、荷兰、葡萄牙、瑞典和联合王国(英格兰和威尔士)进行了一项网络调查,收集了过去一年中至少消费过一次大麻的3,922人的大麻使用模式数据。根据他们在过去12个月的使用天数,他们被分为四组:不经常使用的用户和芯片用户(250天)。考虑到消费方式、年龄和性别的差异,将特定用户类型的典型消费量数据与现有人口调查估计的每种用户类型的用户数量数据相匹配。估计数还补充了问题使用者群体的数据,以弥补覆盖面不足。结果显示,不同国家的用户群体之间存在显著一致的差异。在使用频率增加的用户类型中,每个典型使用日消耗的平均单位数量和每单位消耗的平均大麻量都有所增加。在除葡萄牙以外的所有国家,密集使用者构成了最小的大麻使用者群体,但却占大麻年消费总额的最大部分。各国的大麻年消费量各不相同,但置信区间很宽。结果与以前的估计进行了比较,并在改进估计方法的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信