Attitudes of nurses toward patient-directed dying: a pilot study.

Marcia Sue DeWolf Bosek, Jessica Jannette, Betty Rambur
{"title":"Attitudes of nurses toward patient-directed dying: a pilot study.","authors":"Marcia Sue DeWolf Bosek,&nbsp;Jessica Jannette,&nbsp;Betty Rambur","doi":"10.1097/NHL.0000000000000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-directed dying (PDD) will be an increasingly common issue faced by healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, few studies have explored nurses' attitudes toward PDD. This pilot project sets out to fill the gap regarding nurses' attitudes and values regarding PDD and perceptions of consistency or inconsistency with the American Nurses Association (2001) Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements (The Code). Thirteen subjects self-selected from a population of registrants attending a national ethics conference by completing an anonymous descriptive survey. The majority of subjects noted that their personal and professional values related to PDD are in agreement (regardless of their specific position). The subjects were divided on whether PDD is ethically consistent with The Code. Despite being unsure if PDD is ethically consistent with The Code, these nurses found relief of suffering to be a more compelling rationale for PDD over patient autonomy. This study offers insight into key social and professional issues in which further research is needed and offers many avenues for further investigation. </p>","PeriodicalId":80291,"journal":{"name":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","volume":"15 4","pages":"135-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NHL.0000000000000017","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NHL.0000000000000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Patient-directed dying (PDD) will be an increasingly common issue faced by healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, few studies have explored nurses' attitudes toward PDD. This pilot project sets out to fill the gap regarding nurses' attitudes and values regarding PDD and perceptions of consistency or inconsistency with the American Nurses Association (2001) Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements (The Code). Thirteen subjects self-selected from a population of registrants attending a national ethics conference by completing an anonymous descriptive survey. The majority of subjects noted that their personal and professional values related to PDD are in agreement (regardless of their specific position). The subjects were divided on whether PDD is ethically consistent with The Code. Despite being unsure if PDD is ethically consistent with The Code, these nurses found relief of suffering to be a more compelling rationale for PDD over patient autonomy. This study offers insight into key social and professional issues in which further research is needed and offers many avenues for further investigation.

护士对病人导向死亡的态度:一项初步研究。
病人导向死亡(PDD)将是一个日益普遍的问题面临的医疗保健专业人员。然而,很少有研究探讨护士对PDD的态度。该试点项目旨在填补护士在PDD方面的态度和价值观方面的空白,以及与美国护士协会(2001年)《护士职业道德解释性声明守则》(《守则》)一致或不一致的看法。从参加国家伦理会议的注册者中自行选择13名受试者,完成匿名描述性调查。大多数受试者注意到他们与PDD相关的个人和职业价值观是一致的(不管他们的具体职位如何)。受试者在PDD是否符合道德规范上存在分歧。尽管不确定PDD是否符合道德规范,这些护士发现减轻痛苦是PDD比病人自主更有说服力的理由。这项研究提供了对需要进一步研究的关键社会和专业问题的见解,并为进一步调查提供了许多途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信