Carbapenem-resistant strains from the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the period 2006-2011 from clinical specimens of patients treated at the university hospital in northeastern Poland.

Anna Diana Michalska, Paweł Tomasz Sacha, Dominika Ojdana, Piotr Majewski, Piotr Wieczorek, Elzbieta Tryniszewska
{"title":"Carbapenem-resistant strains from the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the period 2006-2011 from clinical specimens of patients treated at the university hospital in northeastern Poland.","authors":"Anna Diana Michalska,&nbsp;Paweł Tomasz Sacha,&nbsp;Dominika Ojdana,&nbsp;Piotr Majewski,&nbsp;Piotr Wieczorek,&nbsp;Elzbieta Tryniszewska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years an alarming increase of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been noticed, which creates frequent therapeutic problems, especially for patients residing in intensive care units (ICU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the years 2006-2011 at the University Hospital in Bialystok (UHB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on microbiological analysis reports we conducted a retrospective study of strains resistant to carbapenems. We assigned strains to three carbapenem-resistance phenotypes, and analyzed susceptibility to antibiotics and prevalence of these strains in hospital wards and in clinical specimens collected from hospitalized patients. During a six-year period, 216 strains resistant to carbapenems were tested, which represents 0.96% of all Enterobacteriaceae (n = 22.391) isolated during this period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest number of carbapenem-resistant strains was identified in 2011 (96 strains, 44.44%). Antibiotics that showed the highest activity against strains occurring most frequently (Klebsiella pneumoniae [n = 103] and Enterobacter cloacae [n = 85]) were tigecycline (102 [99.03%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 61 [100%] of E. cloacae strains were susceptible), colistin (33 [86.84%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 84 [100%] of E. cloacae were susceptible), and amikacin (86 [83.49%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 26 [30.58%] of E. cloacae strains were susceptible).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed a trend to increase during the six-year period of study. Because infections caused by carbapenem-resistant strains are frequently life-threatening, the effective strategies to control the spreading of antibiotic resistance are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"65 1","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years an alarming increase of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been noticed, which creates frequent therapeutic problems, especially for patients residing in intensive care units (ICU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the years 2006-2011 at the University Hospital in Bialystok (UHB).

Methods: Based on microbiological analysis reports we conducted a retrospective study of strains resistant to carbapenems. We assigned strains to three carbapenem-resistance phenotypes, and analyzed susceptibility to antibiotics and prevalence of these strains in hospital wards and in clinical specimens collected from hospitalized patients. During a six-year period, 216 strains resistant to carbapenems were tested, which represents 0.96% of all Enterobacteriaceae (n = 22.391) isolated during this period.

Results: The greatest number of carbapenem-resistant strains was identified in 2011 (96 strains, 44.44%). Antibiotics that showed the highest activity against strains occurring most frequently (Klebsiella pneumoniae [n = 103] and Enterobacter cloacae [n = 85]) were tigecycline (102 [99.03%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 61 [100%] of E. cloacae strains were susceptible), colistin (33 [86.84%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 84 [100%] of E. cloacae were susceptible), and amikacin (86 [83.49%] of K. pneumoniae tested strains and 26 [30.58%] of E. cloacae strains were susceptible).

Conclusions: Carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed a trend to increase during the six-year period of study. Because infections caused by carbapenem-resistant strains are frequently life-threatening, the effective strategies to control the spreading of antibiotic resistance are necessary.

2006-2011年期间从波兰东北部大学医院治疗的患者临床标本中分离出肠杆菌科碳青霉烯类耐药菌株。
近年来,碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科的数量惊人地增加,这造成了频繁的治疗问题,特别是对于居住在重症监护病房(ICU)的患者。本研究的目的是评估2006-2011年在比亚韦斯托克大学医院(UHB)分离的肠杆菌科碳青霉烯类耐药菌株的流行情况。方法:根据微生物学分析报告,对碳青霉烯类耐药菌株进行回顾性研究。我们将菌株划分为三种碳青霉烯耐药表型,并分析了这些菌株在医院病房和住院患者临床标本中的抗生素敏感性和患病率。6年间共检出耐碳青霉烯类细菌216株,占分离到的肠杆菌科细菌总数的0.96% (n = 22.391)。结果:2011年检出碳青霉烯类耐药菌株最多(96株,占44.44%);对常见病原菌(肺炎克雷伯菌[n = 103]和阴沟肠杆菌[n = 85])活性最高的抗生素为替加环素(肺炎克雷伯菌试验株102[99.03%],阴沟肠杆菌61[100%]敏感)、粘菌素(肺炎克雷伯菌试验株33[86.84%],阴沟肠杆菌84[100%]敏感)和阿米卡星(肺炎克雷伯菌试验株86[83.49%],阴沟肠杆菌26[30.58%]敏感)。结论:在6年的研究期间,肠杆菌科分离株对碳青霉烯类药物的耐药性呈上升趋势。由于碳青霉烯耐药菌株引起的感染经常危及生命,因此有必要采取有效的策略来控制抗生素耐药性的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信