mHealth for HIV Treatment & Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

The Open AIDS Journal Pub Date : 2013-08-13 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874613620130812003
Caricia Catalani, William Philbrick, Hamish Fraser, Patricia Mechael, Dennis M Israelski
{"title":"mHealth for HIV Treatment & Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Caricia Catalani,&nbsp;William Philbrick,&nbsp;Hamish Fraser,&nbsp;Patricia Mechael,&nbsp;Dennis M Israelski","doi":"10.2174/1874613620130812003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review assesses the published literature to describe the landscape of mobile health technology (mHealth) for HIV/AIDS and the evidence supporting the use of these tools to address the HIV prevention, care, and treatment cascade. The speed of innovation, broad range of initiatives and tools, and heterogeneity in reporting have made it difficult to uncover and synthesize knowledge on how mHealth tools might be effective in addressing the HIV pandemic. To do address this gap, a team of reviewers collected literature on the use of mobile technology for HIV/AIDS among health, engineering, and social science literature databases and analyzed a final set of 62 articles. Articles were systematically coded, assessed for scientific rigor, and sorted for HIV programmatic relevance. The review revealed evidence that mHealth tools support HIV programmatic priorities, including: linkage to care, retention in care, and adherence to antiretroviral treatment. In terms of technical features, mHealth tools facilitate alerts and reminders, data collection, direct voice communication, educational messaging, information on demand, and more. Studies were mostly descriptive with a growing number of quasi-experimental and experimental designs. There was a lack of evidence around the use of mHealth tools to address the needs of key populations, including pregnant mothers, sex workers, users of injection drugs, and men who have sex with men. The science and practice of mHealth for HIV are evolving rapidly, but still in their early stages. Small-scale efforts, pilot projects, and preliminary descriptive studies are advancing and there is a promising trend toward implementing mHealth innovation that is feasible and acceptable within low-resource settings, positive program outcomes, operational improvements, and rigorous study design. </p>","PeriodicalId":515834,"journal":{"name":"The Open AIDS Journal","volume":"7 ","pages":"17-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874613620130812003","citationCount":"223","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open AIDS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613620130812003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 223

Abstract

This systematic review assesses the published literature to describe the landscape of mobile health technology (mHealth) for HIV/AIDS and the evidence supporting the use of these tools to address the HIV prevention, care, and treatment cascade. The speed of innovation, broad range of initiatives and tools, and heterogeneity in reporting have made it difficult to uncover and synthesize knowledge on how mHealth tools might be effective in addressing the HIV pandemic. To do address this gap, a team of reviewers collected literature on the use of mobile technology for HIV/AIDS among health, engineering, and social science literature databases and analyzed a final set of 62 articles. Articles were systematically coded, assessed for scientific rigor, and sorted for HIV programmatic relevance. The review revealed evidence that mHealth tools support HIV programmatic priorities, including: linkage to care, retention in care, and adherence to antiretroviral treatment. In terms of technical features, mHealth tools facilitate alerts and reminders, data collection, direct voice communication, educational messaging, information on demand, and more. Studies were mostly descriptive with a growing number of quasi-experimental and experimental designs. There was a lack of evidence around the use of mHealth tools to address the needs of key populations, including pregnant mothers, sex workers, users of injection drugs, and men who have sex with men. The science and practice of mHealth for HIV are evolving rapidly, but still in their early stages. Small-scale efforts, pilot projects, and preliminary descriptive studies are advancing and there is a promising trend toward implementing mHealth innovation that is feasible and acceptable within low-resource settings, positive program outcomes, operational improvements, and rigorous study design.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

移动医疗用于艾滋病治疗和预防:文献的系统回顾。
本系统综述评估了已发表的文献,以描述艾滋病毒/艾滋病移动医疗技术(mHealth)的前景,以及支持使用这些工具解决艾滋病毒预防、护理和治疗级联问题的证据。由于创新的速度、广泛的举措和工具以及报告的异质性,很难发现和综合有关移动保健工具如何有效应对艾滋病毒大流行的知识。为了弥补这一差距,一个审稿人小组在卫生、工程和社会科学文献数据库中收集了关于使用移动技术治疗艾滋病毒/艾滋病的文献,并分析了最后一组62篇文章。文章被系统地编码,评估科学严谨性,并根据艾滋病毒规划相关性进行分类。审查结果显示,有证据表明移动医疗工具支持艾滋病毒规划优先事项,包括:与护理的联系、保留护理和坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗。在技术特性方面,移动健康工具促进警报和提醒、数据收集、直接语音通信、教育信息、按需信息等。研究大多是描述性的,有越来越多的准实验和实验设计。关于使用移动医疗工具来满足关键人群的需求,包括孕妇、性工作者、注射毒品使用者和男男性行为者,缺乏证据。针对艾滋病毒的移动医疗科学和实践正在迅速发展,但仍处于早期阶段。小规模的努力、试点项目和初步的描述性研究正在推进,在低资源环境、积极的项目成果、操作改进和严格的研究设计中,实施移动医疗创新是可行和可接受的,这是一个有希望的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信