{"title":"Metabiotics: novel idea or natural development of probiotic conception.","authors":"Boris A Shenderov","doi":"10.3402/mehd.v24i0.20399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, probiotics on the base of live microorganisms are considered to be both beneficial and safe. Unfortunately, their effects may have short-term success or are absent or uncertain. Some symbiotic (probiotic) microorganisms with known beneficial health affects may cause opportunistic infections, increase incidence of allergic sensitization and autoimmune disorders, produce microecological imbalance, modify gene expression, transfer antibiotic resistant and virulence genes, cause disorders in epigenome and genome integrity, induce chromosomal DNA damage, and activate signaling pathways associated with cancer and other chronic diseases. The commercially available probiotics should be considered as a first generation means of correcting microecological disorders. Further, their development will include the selection of natural metabiotics and/or working out the synthetic (or semi-synthetic) metabiotics that will be analogies or improved copies of natural bioactives, produced by symbiotic (probiotic) microorganisms. Metabiotics are the structural components of probiotic microorganisms and/or their metabolites and/or signaling molecules with a determined (known) chemical structure that can optimize host-specific physiological functions, regulator, metabolic and/or behavior reactions connected with the activity of host indigenous microbiota. Metabiotics have some advantages because of their exact chemical structure, well dosed, very safe and long shelf-life. Thus, now metabiotics should not consider myth; they are the result of the natural evolution of probiotic conception. </p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"24 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/mehd.v24i0.20399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditionally, probiotics on the base of live microorganisms are considered to be both beneficial and safe. Unfortunately, their effects may have short-term success or are absent or uncertain. Some symbiotic (probiotic) microorganisms with known beneficial health affects may cause opportunistic infections, increase incidence of allergic sensitization and autoimmune disorders, produce microecological imbalance, modify gene expression, transfer antibiotic resistant and virulence genes, cause disorders in epigenome and genome integrity, induce chromosomal DNA damage, and activate signaling pathways associated with cancer and other chronic diseases. The commercially available probiotics should be considered as a first generation means of correcting microecological disorders. Further, their development will include the selection of natural metabiotics and/or working out the synthetic (or semi-synthetic) metabiotics that will be analogies or improved copies of natural bioactives, produced by symbiotic (probiotic) microorganisms. Metabiotics are the structural components of probiotic microorganisms and/or their metabolites and/or signaling molecules with a determined (known) chemical structure that can optimize host-specific physiological functions, regulator, metabolic and/or behavior reactions connected with the activity of host indigenous microbiota. Metabiotics have some advantages because of their exact chemical structure, well dosed, very safe and long shelf-life. Thus, now metabiotics should not consider myth; they are the result of the natural evolution of probiotic conception.
传统上,以活微生物为基础的益生菌被认为既有益又安全。遗憾的是,它们的效果可能只是短期的,或者不存在或不确定。一些已知对健康有益的共生(益生菌)微生物可能会导致机会性感染,增加过敏和自身免疫疾病的发病率,造成微生态失衡,改变基因表达,转移抗生素耐药基因和毒力基因,导致表观基因组和基因组完整性紊乱,诱发染色体 DNA 损伤,激活与癌症和其他慢性疾病相关的信号通路。市售益生菌应被视为纠正微生态失调的第一代手段。此外,它们的发展将包括选择天然代谢物和/或研究合成(或半合成)代谢物,这些代谢物将是共生(益生菌)微生物产生的天然生物活性物质的类似物或改良复制品。代谢物是益生微生物和/或其代谢物和/或信号分子的结构成分,具有确定(已知)的化学结构,可优化宿主特有的生理功能、调节器、代谢和/或与宿主本地微生物群活动有关的行为反应。生物元具有一些优势,如化学结构准确、剂量合理、非常安全且保质期长。因此,现在不应将元生物视为神话;它们是益生菌概念自然演变的结果。