Impact of amending the acetylcysteine marketing authorisation on treatment of paracetamol overdose.

ISRN Toxicology Pub Date : 2013-07-16 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/494357
G Thompson, S B Fatima, N Shah, G Kitching, W S Waring
{"title":"Impact of amending the acetylcysteine marketing authorisation on treatment of paracetamol overdose.","authors":"G Thompson,&nbsp;S B Fatima,&nbsp;N Shah,&nbsp;G Kitching,&nbsp;W S Waring","doi":"10.1155/2013/494357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In September 2012, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) substantially amended the Marketing Authorisation for acetylcysteine following an extensive review. The present study examined the impact of this license change on patterns of acetylcysteine use in patients presenting to hospital after paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. Between September 2011 and April 2013, 785 consecutive patients presented to York Hospital due to paracetamol overdose, and a before-after analysis was used to compare outcomes. There were 483 patients before and 302 patients after the license amendment, and age, gender, acute or staggered overdose pattern, and dose were similar in both groups. In the patients with paracetamol concentrations between the \"100-line\" and \"200-line,\" a significantly higher proportion received acetylcysteine treatment (51% before versus 98% after, P = 0.0029), as expected. A modest increase was also observed in relation to late or staggered overdose or cases where the time of ingestion was uncertain (53% versus 74%, P = 0.0430). The median duration of hospital stay increased across the entire study population, from 15 to 24 hours (P = 0.0159) due to the increased proportion of patients requiring acetylcysteine treatment. The findings indicate that the MHRA amendment is a financially costly intervention, and further studies are needed to examine clinical outcomes so that its cost effectiveness might be addressed. </p>","PeriodicalId":14674,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Toxicology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"494357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/494357","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/494357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In September 2012, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) substantially amended the Marketing Authorisation for acetylcysteine following an extensive review. The present study examined the impact of this license change on patterns of acetylcysteine use in patients presenting to hospital after paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. Between September 2011 and April 2013, 785 consecutive patients presented to York Hospital due to paracetamol overdose, and a before-after analysis was used to compare outcomes. There were 483 patients before and 302 patients after the license amendment, and age, gender, acute or staggered overdose pattern, and dose were similar in both groups. In the patients with paracetamol concentrations between the "100-line" and "200-line," a significantly higher proportion received acetylcysteine treatment (51% before versus 98% after, P = 0.0029), as expected. A modest increase was also observed in relation to late or staggered overdose or cases where the time of ingestion was uncertain (53% versus 74%, P = 0.0430). The median duration of hospital stay increased across the entire study population, from 15 to 24 hours (P = 0.0159) due to the increased proportion of patients requiring acetylcysteine treatment. The findings indicate that the MHRA amendment is a financially costly intervention, and further studies are needed to examine clinical outcomes so that its cost effectiveness might be addressed.

修改乙酰半胱氨酸上市许可对扑热息痛过量治疗的影响。
2012年9月,药品和保健产品监管机构(MHRA)在广泛审查后大幅修订了乙酰半胱氨酸的上市许可。本研究考察了许可变更对乙酰氨基酚(对乙酰氨基酚)过量后入院患者乙酰半胱氨酸使用模式的影响。在2011年9月至2013年4月期间,785名连续患者因对乙酰氨基酚过量而前往约克医院,并使用前后分析来比较结果。修改许可前483例,修改许可后302例,两组患者年龄、性别、急性或交错用药模式、用药剂量相似。在扑热息痛浓度介于“100线”和“200线”之间的患者中,接受乙酰半胱氨酸治疗的比例明显更高(治疗前为51%,治疗后为98%,P = 0.0029)。晚期或交错过量或摄入时间不确定的病例也观察到适度增加(53%对74%,P = 0.0430)。由于需要乙酰半胱氨酸治疗的患者比例增加,整个研究人群的中位住院时间从15小时增加到24小时(P = 0.0159)。研究结果表明,MHRA修正案是一项财政上昂贵的干预措施,需要进一步研究临床结果,以便解决其成本效益问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信