Health threat increases attentional bias for negative stimuli

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Amar Kaur, Phyllis N. Butow, Louise Sharpe
{"title":"Health threat increases attentional bias for negative stimuli","authors":"Amar Kaur,&nbsp;Phyllis N. Butow,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Although there is some evidence that health anxiety is associated with attentional bias, relatively little research has examined the role of situational threat on bias. This study examined the effect of health threat on attentional bias for negative health words.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed questionnaires and were then randomized to receive either threatening or reassuring health-related feedback. Following randomization, participants completed the emotional Stroop and dot-probe tasks in a counter-balanced order.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On the emotional Stroop task, all participants took longer to name the colour of negative words, as compared to positive and neutral words. However on the dot probe task, differences in attentional bias emerged based on feedback condition. Those receiving reassuring feedback displayed a bias away from negative words while those receiving threatening feedback did not display a bias either towards or away from negative words. Following reassuring feedback only, metacognitions were negatively correlated with attention towards positive health-related stimuli, suggesting another avenue for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Health threats lead to an increase in the processing of negative information, and the effect of metacognitions on processing appears to be apparent only in the absence of health threat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 469-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.06.003","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579161300044X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background and objectives

Although there is some evidence that health anxiety is associated with attentional bias, relatively little research has examined the role of situational threat on bias. This study examined the effect of health threat on attentional bias for negative health words.

Methods

Participants completed questionnaires and were then randomized to receive either threatening or reassuring health-related feedback. Following randomization, participants completed the emotional Stroop and dot-probe tasks in a counter-balanced order.

Results

On the emotional Stroop task, all participants took longer to name the colour of negative words, as compared to positive and neutral words. However on the dot probe task, differences in attentional bias emerged based on feedback condition. Those receiving reassuring feedback displayed a bias away from negative words while those receiving threatening feedback did not display a bias either towards or away from negative words. Following reassuring feedback only, metacognitions were negatively correlated with attention towards positive health-related stimuli, suggesting another avenue for future research.

Conclusions

Health threats lead to an increase in the processing of negative information, and the effect of metacognitions on processing appears to be apparent only in the absence of health threat.

健康威胁增加了对负面刺激的注意偏向
背景和目的虽然有一些证据表明健康焦虑与注意偏差有关,但相对较少的研究考察了情境威胁对注意偏差的作用。本研究考察了健康威胁对健康消极词汇注意偏倚的影响。方法参与者完成问卷调查,然后随机接受威胁性或安慰性健康相关反馈。随机分组后,参与者以平衡顺序完成情绪Stroop和点探测任务。结果在情绪Stroop任务中,所有参与者都花了比积极和中性词汇更长的时间来命名消极词汇的颜色。而在点探测任务中,不同反馈条件下的注意偏倚出现了差异。那些收到安慰性反馈的人对消极词汇表现出了偏见,而那些收到威胁性反馈的人对消极词汇既没有偏见,也没有偏见。仅在安心反馈之后,元认知与对积极健康相关刺激的关注呈负相关,这为未来的研究提供了另一种途径。结论健康威胁导致负性信息加工增加,而元认知对负性信息加工的影响只有在健康威胁不存在的情况下才明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信