Emotional ambivalence and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in soldiers during military operations.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2013-06-17 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3205/psm000093
Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Steffen Walter, Kerstin Limbrecht-Ecklundt, Harald C Traue
{"title":"Emotional ambivalence and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in soldiers during military operations.","authors":"Lucia Jerg-Bretzke,&nbsp;Steffen Walter,&nbsp;Kerstin Limbrecht-Ecklundt,&nbsp;Harald C Traue","doi":"10.3205/psm000093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study examined the extent to which a specific mechanism of emotion regulation - namely, ambivalence concerning the expressiveness of German soldiers' emotions - affects the severity of PTSD symptoms after a military operation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A survey was conducted at three points in time among 66 soldiers deployed on military crisis operations. The Harvard Trauma Questionaire (HTQ), the Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire (AEQ-G18), and a questionnaire on the particular stress of German soldiers during military operations were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed a significant correlation between emotional ambivalence and traumatization. Furthermore, it was shown that the subjective stress of soldiers leading up to deployment is more pronounced when emotional ambivalence is stronger in the context of military operations. This particular stress is greater before and during the military operation than after. Compared to a male control sample, the average AEQ-G18 scores of the soldier sample examined here are considerably lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study clearly indicates that the AEQ-G18 could be a suitable predictor of the psychological burden on soldiers. The correlations between emotional ambivalence on the one hand and the particular and post-traumatic stressors on the other hand are not only statistically significant in the present pilot study, but may also be relevant as risk factors. It is, therefore, necessary to conduct more extensive studies on soldiers participating in military operations to verify the results of this pilot study.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"Doc03"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000093","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study examined the extent to which a specific mechanism of emotion regulation - namely, ambivalence concerning the expressiveness of German soldiers' emotions - affects the severity of PTSD symptoms after a military operation.

Methodology: A survey was conducted at three points in time among 66 soldiers deployed on military crisis operations. The Harvard Trauma Questionaire (HTQ), the Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire (AEQ-G18), and a questionnaire on the particular stress of German soldiers during military operations were used.

Results: The study showed a significant correlation between emotional ambivalence and traumatization. Furthermore, it was shown that the subjective stress of soldiers leading up to deployment is more pronounced when emotional ambivalence is stronger in the context of military operations. This particular stress is greater before and during the military operation than after. Compared to a male control sample, the average AEQ-G18 scores of the soldier sample examined here are considerably lower.

Conclusion: This pilot study clearly indicates that the AEQ-G18 could be a suitable predictor of the psychological burden on soldiers. The correlations between emotional ambivalence on the one hand and the particular and post-traumatic stressors on the other hand are not only statistically significant in the present pilot study, but may also be relevant as risk factors. It is, therefore, necessary to conduct more extensive studies on soldiers participating in military operations to verify the results of this pilot study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

军事行动中士兵的情绪矛盾与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。
目的:本初步研究考察了一种特定的情绪调节机制——即关于德国士兵情绪表达的矛盾心理——在多大程度上影响军事行动后创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度。方法:以66名紧急作战部队为对象,在3个时间点进行了问卷调查。采用哈佛创伤问卷(HTQ)、情绪表达矛盾心理问卷(AEQ-G18)和德国士兵在军事行动中的特殊压力问卷。结果:情绪矛盾心理与创伤有显著相关。此外,研究表明,在军事行动背景下,当情绪矛盾心理更强时,士兵在部署前的主观压力更明显。这种特殊的压力在军事行动之前和期间比在军事行动之后更大。与男性对照样本相比,士兵样本的AEQ-G18平均得分要低得多。结论:本初步研究表明,AEQ-G18可作为士兵心理负担的一种较好的预测指标。在本初步研究中,情绪矛盾心理与特定应激源和创伤后应激源之间的相关性不仅具有统计学意义,而且可能是相关的危险因素。因此,有必要对参加军事行动的士兵进行更广泛的研究,以核实这项初步研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书