{"title":"Eco-score labels on meat products: Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable choices","authors":"Victoria Williams, Orla Flannery, Ajay Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-profit organisations have developed labelling strategies to communicate the environmental impact of food products, helping consumers make more informed purchase decisions. The evidence on whether environmental food labelling can change behaviours toward environmental meat choices is unclear, due to context factors within shopping environments and differences in attitudes towards meat and the environment. This study investigates attitudes towards an eco-score label on meat products by measuring the influence of meat and environmental attitudes and identifying drivers and barriers through a mixed-methods design. An online questionnaire (N = 255) posed questions concerning meat consumption, label perceptions, and use intentions. Recruitment was via convenience sampling under the criteria of UK dweller, omnivorous diet and over 18 years of age. Nine semi-structured interviews explored the drivers and barriers for intended use through thematic analysis. Perceptions Scores (PS) and Purchase Intention (PI) scores of the label were positive. Results showed an individual’s Meat attachment (affinity) score (MAAS) negligibly influenced PS but provided a moderately negative relationship with PI. Environmental label use and attitudes positively influenced PS and PI. The qualitative data identified label design and concept perceptions as drivers for use, whereas habitual shopping behaviours and perceived price were barriers. The research contributes to the transtheoretical model of behavioural change, identifying that 58% of participants contemplate label use but require more information. Explanations found for the gap between positive perceptions and low behavioural intentions support this, as poor label awareness and knowledge of the environmental impact of meat production were highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 104973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329323001672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-profit organisations have developed labelling strategies to communicate the environmental impact of food products, helping consumers make more informed purchase decisions. The evidence on whether environmental food labelling can change behaviours toward environmental meat choices is unclear, due to context factors within shopping environments and differences in attitudes towards meat and the environment. This study investigates attitudes towards an eco-score label on meat products by measuring the influence of meat and environmental attitudes and identifying drivers and barriers through a mixed-methods design. An online questionnaire (N = 255) posed questions concerning meat consumption, label perceptions, and use intentions. Recruitment was via convenience sampling under the criteria of UK dweller, omnivorous diet and over 18 years of age. Nine semi-structured interviews explored the drivers and barriers for intended use through thematic analysis. Perceptions Scores (PS) and Purchase Intention (PI) scores of the label were positive. Results showed an individual’s Meat attachment (affinity) score (MAAS) negligibly influenced PS but provided a moderately negative relationship with PI. Environmental label use and attitudes positively influenced PS and PI. The qualitative data identified label design and concept perceptions as drivers for use, whereas habitual shopping behaviours and perceived price were barriers. The research contributes to the transtheoretical model of behavioural change, identifying that 58% of participants contemplate label use but require more information. Explanations found for the gap between positive perceptions and low behavioural intentions support this, as poor label awareness and knowledge of the environmental impact of meat production were highlighted.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.