Topical anaesthesia does not affect cutaneous vasomotor or sudomotor responses in human skin

K. Metzler-Wilson, T. E. Wilson
{"title":"Topical anaesthesia does not affect cutaneous vasomotor or sudomotor responses in human skin","authors":"K. Metzler-Wilson,&nbsp;T. E. Wilson","doi":"10.1111/aap.12007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n \n </p><ol>\n \n \n <li>The effects of local sensory blockade (topical anaesthesia) on eccrine sweat glands and cutaneous circulation are not well understood. This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine/prilocaine alters eccrine sweat gland and cutaneous blood vessel responses.</li>\n \n \n <li>Sweating (capacitance hygrometry) was induced via forearm intradermal microdialysis of five acetylcholine (ACh) doses (1 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 1 × 10<sup>0</sup> <span>m</span>, 10-fold increments) in control and treated forearm sites in six healthy subjects. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory (sodium nitroprusside) and adrenergic vasoconstrictor (noradrenaline) agonists were iontophoresed in lidocaine/prilocaine-treated and control forearm skin in nine healthy subjects during blood flow assessment (laser Doppler flowmetry, expressed as% from baseline cutaneous vascular conductance; CVC; flux/mean arterial pressure).</li>\n \n \n <li>Non-linear regression curve fitting identified no change in the ED<sub>50</sub> of ACh-induced sweating after sensory blockade (−1.42 ± 0.23 logM) compared to control (−1.27 ± 0.23 logM; <i>P</i> &gt; .05) or in <i>E</i><sub>max</sub> (0.43 ± 0.08 with, 0.53 ± 0.16 mg cm<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> without lidocaine/prilocaine; <i>P</i> &gt; .05). Sensory blockade did not alter the vasodilator response to sodium nitroprusside (1280 ± 548% change from baseline CVC with, 1204 ± 247% without lidocaine/prilocaine) or vasoconstrictor response to noradrenaline (−14 ± 4% change from baseline CVC with, −22 ± 14% without lidocaine/prilocaine; <i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</li>\n \n \n <li>Cutaneous sensory blockade does not appear to alter nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, adrenergic vasoconstriction, or cholinergic eccrine sweating dose-response sensitivity or responsiveness to maximal dose. Thus, lidocaine/prilocaine treatment should not affect sweat gland function or have blood flow implications for subsequent research protocols or clinical procedures.</li>\n </ol>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":100151,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic and Autacoid Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/aap.12007","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic and Autacoid Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aap.12007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

  1. The effects of local sensory blockade (topical anaesthesia) on eccrine sweat glands and cutaneous circulation are not well understood. This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine/prilocaine alters eccrine sweat gland and cutaneous blood vessel responses.
  2. Sweating (capacitance hygrometry) was induced via forearm intradermal microdialysis of five acetylcholine (ACh) doses (1 × 10−4 to 1 × 100 m, 10-fold increments) in control and treated forearm sites in six healthy subjects. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory (sodium nitroprusside) and adrenergic vasoconstrictor (noradrenaline) agonists were iontophoresed in lidocaine/prilocaine-treated and control forearm skin in nine healthy subjects during blood flow assessment (laser Doppler flowmetry, expressed as% from baseline cutaneous vascular conductance; CVC; flux/mean arterial pressure).
  3. Non-linear regression curve fitting identified no change in the ED50 of ACh-induced sweating after sensory blockade (−1.42 ± 0.23 logM) compared to control (−1.27 ± 0.23 logM; P > .05) or in Emax (0.43 ± 0.08 with, 0.53 ± 0.16 mg cm−2 min−1 without lidocaine/prilocaine; P > .05). Sensory blockade did not alter the vasodilator response to sodium nitroprusside (1280 ± 548% change from baseline CVC with, 1204 ± 247% without lidocaine/prilocaine) or vasoconstrictor response to noradrenaline (−14 ± 4% change from baseline CVC with, −22 ± 14% without lidocaine/prilocaine; P > 0.05).
  4. Cutaneous sensory blockade does not appear to alter nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, adrenergic vasoconstriction, or cholinergic eccrine sweating dose-response sensitivity or responsiveness to maximal dose. Thus, lidocaine/prilocaine treatment should not affect sweat gland function or have blood flow implications for subsequent research protocols or clinical procedures.
局部麻醉不影响人体皮肤的血管舒缩或压迫运动反应
局部感觉阻滞(局部麻醉)对汗腺和皮肤循环的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定外用利多卡因/丙胺卡因是否会改变汗腺和皮肤血管反应。通过前臂皮内微透析5种剂量(1 × 10−4至1 × 100 m, 10倍增量)的乙酰胆碱(ACh),在6名健康受试者的对照和治疗前臂部位诱导出汗(电容测湿法)。在血流评估(激光多普勒血流测量,以基线皮肤血管导度%表示)期间,在利多卡因/丙胺卡因治疗和对照的9名健康受试者前臂皮肤中,一氧化氮介导的血管舒张剂(硝普钠)和肾上腺素能血管收缩剂(去甲肾上腺素)激动剂被离子介导;CVC;通量/平均动脉压)。非线性回归曲线拟合发现,与对照组(- 1.27±0.23 logM)相比,感觉阻断后乙酰胆碱诱导出汗的ED50无变化(- 1.42±0.23 logM);P比;0.05)或Emax组(含0.43±0.08 mg cm−2 min−1,不含0.53±0.16 mg cm−2 min−1);P比;. 05)。感觉阻滞未改变硝普钠的血管扩张反应(与基线CVC相比,有利多卡因/普胺时变化1280±548%,无利多卡因/普胺时变化1204±247%)或去甲肾上腺素的血管收缩反应(与基线CVC相比,有- 14±4%,无利多卡因/普胺时变化- 22±14%);P比;0.05)。皮肤感觉阻滞似乎不会改变一氧化氮介导的血管舒张、肾上腺素能血管收缩或胆碱能分泌出汗的剂量反应敏感性或对最大剂量的反应。因此,利多卡因/丙胺卡因治疗不应影响汗腺功能或对后续研究方案或临床程序产生血流影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信