Indigenous Birth Outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - an Overview.

Janet Smylie, Sue Crengle, Jane Freemantle, Maile Taualii
{"title":"Indigenous Birth Outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - an Overview.","authors":"Janet Smylie, Sue Crengle, Jane Freemantle, Maile Taualii","doi":"10.2174/1874291201004010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To review Indigenous infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, and preterm birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. METHODS: Systematic searches of published literature and a review and assessment of existing perinatal surveillance systems were undertaken. Where possible, within country comparisons of Indigenous to non-Indigenous birth outcomes are included. RESULTS: Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios range from 1.6 to 4.0. Stillbirth rates, where data are available, are also uniformly higher for Indigenous people. In all four countries, the disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios are most marked in the post-neonatal period. With few exceptions, the rates of leading causes of infant mortality are higher among Indigenous infants than non-Indigenous infants within all four countries. In most cases, rates of small for gestational age and preterm birth were also elevated for Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous infants. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. These Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcome disparities fit the criteria for health inequities, as they are not only unnecessary and avoidable, but also unfair and unjust.</p>","PeriodicalId":89638,"journal":{"name":"The open women's health journal","volume":" 4","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/2a/nihms2716.PMC3563669.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open women's health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874291201004010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review Indigenous infant mortality, stillbirth, birth weight, and preterm birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. METHODS: Systematic searches of published literature and a review and assessment of existing perinatal surveillance systems were undertaken. Where possible, within country comparisons of Indigenous to non-Indigenous birth outcomes are included. RESULTS: Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios range from 1.6 to 4.0. Stillbirth rates, where data are available, are also uniformly higher for Indigenous people. In all four countries, the disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous infant mortality rate ratios are most marked in the post-neonatal period. With few exceptions, the rates of leading causes of infant mortality are higher among Indigenous infants than non-Indigenous infants within all four countries. In most cases, rates of small for gestational age and preterm birth were also elevated for Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous infants. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant disparities in Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcomes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. These Indigenous/non-Indigenous birth outcome disparities fit the criteria for health inequities, as they are not only unnecessary and avoidable, but also unfair and unjust.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国的本土出生结果综述。
目的:回顾澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国土著婴儿死亡率、死产、出生体重和早产结局。方法:系统地检索已发表的文献,并对现有的围产期监测系统进行回顾和评估。在可能的情况下,还包括在国家内部对土著和非土著生育结果的比较。结果:土著/非土著婴儿死亡率在1.6 - 4.0之间。根据现有数据,土著居民的死产率也一致较高。在所有四个国家中,土著/非土著婴儿死亡率比率的差异在新生儿后期最为明显。除少数例外情况外,在所有四个国家中,土著婴儿死亡率的主要原因都高于非土著婴儿。在大多数情况下,与非土著婴儿相比,土著婴儿的胎龄小和早产率也较高。结论:澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国的土著/非土著分娩结局存在显著差异。这些土著/非土著生育结果的差异符合卫生不平等的标准,因为它们不仅是不必要和可避免的,而且是不公平和不公正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信