The Global Body Examination (GBE). A useful instrument for evaluation of respiration.

Advances in physiotherapy Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-02 DOI:10.3109/14038196.2012.704943
Svein Friis, Alice Kvåle, Stein Opjordsmoen, Berit H Bunkan
{"title":"The Global Body Examination (GBE). A useful instrument for evaluation of respiration.","authors":"Svein Friis, Alice Kvåle, Stein Opjordsmoen, Berit H Bunkan","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2012.704943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessment of respiration is important in medicine and physical therapy. As respiration is multifaceted, we need several specific examination methods. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for examination of visible respiratory movements, by extracting from two examinations the items with best ability to discriminate among healthy controls, patients with pain disorders and patients with psychotic disorders. METHODS: Two physiotherapists independently examined 132 individuals (34 healthy persons, 32 with localized pain, 32 with widespread pain and 34 with psychoses). Items were assigned to subscales by explorative factor analysis. Internal consistency of subscales was examined with Cronbach's alpha. To examine validity, one-way analysis of variance and the area under the curve (AUC) were used. RESULTS: WE IDENTIFIED FOUR SUBSCALES: Tension, Position of Thorax, Basal respiration and Thoracic movements. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.86. The subscales' discriminating ability was excellent between healthy controls and patients, and fair between patients with localized pain and the two other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The respiration domain of the new Global Body Examination has 21 items, which comprise four subscales with high internal consistency and good ability to discriminate between healthy persons and patients with pain disorders or psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"14 4","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/d4/PHY-14-146.PMC3518292.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.704943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessment of respiration is important in medicine and physical therapy. As respiration is multifaceted, we need several specific examination methods. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for examination of visible respiratory movements, by extracting from two examinations the items with best ability to discriminate among healthy controls, patients with pain disorders and patients with psychotic disorders. METHODS: Two physiotherapists independently examined 132 individuals (34 healthy persons, 32 with localized pain, 32 with widespread pain and 34 with psychoses). Items were assigned to subscales by explorative factor analysis. Internal consistency of subscales was examined with Cronbach's alpha. To examine validity, one-way analysis of variance and the area under the curve (AUC) were used. RESULTS: WE IDENTIFIED FOUR SUBSCALES: Tension, Position of Thorax, Basal respiration and Thoracic movements. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.86. The subscales' discriminating ability was excellent between healthy controls and patients, and fair between patients with localized pain and the two other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The respiration domain of the new Global Body Examination has 21 items, which comprise four subscales with high internal consistency and good ability to discriminate between healthy persons and patients with pain disorders or psychosis.

Abstract Image

全身检查(GBE)。用于评估呼吸的有用工具。
背景和目的:呼吸评估在医学和物理治疗中非常重要。由于呼吸是多方面的,我们需要几种特定的检查方法。本研究的目的是通过从两次检查中筛选出最能区分健康对照组、疼痛障碍患者和精神障碍患者的项目,从而开发出一种检查可见呼吸运动的方法。 方法:由两名物理治疗师对 132 人(34 名健康人、32 名局部疼痛患者、32 名广泛疼痛患者和 34 名精神病患者)进行独立检查。通过探索性因子分析将项目归入子量表。用 Cronbach's alpha 检验了子量表的内部一致性。为了检验有效性,采用了单因子方差分析和曲线下面积(AUC)。 结果:我们确定了四个子量表:张力、胸廓位置、基础呼吸和胸廓运动。Cronbach's alpha 在 0.75 至 0.86 之间。各分量表在健康对照组和患者之间的区分能力极佳,在局部疼痛患者和其他两组患者之间的区分能力尚可。 结论:新版全球身体检查的呼吸领域共有 21 个项目,由四个分量表组成,具有较高的内部一致性,在健康人与疼痛障碍或精神病患者之间具有良好的区分能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信