Comparative risk for angioedema associated with the use of drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Sengwee Toh, Marsha E Reichman, Monika Houstoun, Mary Ross Southworth, Xiao Ding, Adrian F Hernandez, Mark Levenson, Lingling Li, Carolyn McCloskey, Azadeh Shoaibi, Eileen Wu, Gwen Zornberg, Sean Hennessy
{"title":"Comparative risk for angioedema associated with the use of drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.","authors":"Sengwee Toh,&nbsp;Marsha E Reichman,&nbsp;Monika Houstoun,&nbsp;Mary Ross Southworth,&nbsp;Xiao Ding,&nbsp;Adrian F Hernandez,&nbsp;Mark Levenson,&nbsp;Lingling Li,&nbsp;Carolyn McCloskey,&nbsp;Azadeh Shoaibi,&nbsp;Eileen Wu,&nbsp;Gwen Zornberg,&nbsp;Sean Hennessy","doi":"10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although certain drugs that target the renin- angiotensin-aldosterone system are linked to an increased risk for angioedema, data on their absolute and comparative risks are limited. We assessed the risk for angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, observational, inception cohort study of patients 18 years or older from 17 health plans participating in the Mini-Sentinel program who had initiated the use of an ACEI (n = 1 845 138), an ARB (n = 467 313), aliskiren (n = 4867), or a β-blocker (n = 1 592 278) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010. We calculated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of angioedema during a maximal 365-day follow-up period. Using β-blockers as a reference and a propensity score approach, we estimated the hazard ratios of angioedema separately for ACEIs, ARBs, and aliskiren, adjusting for age, sex, history of allergic reactions, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or ischemic heart disease, and the use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4511 angioedema events (3301 for ACEIs, 288 for ARBs, 7 for aliskiren, and 915 for β-blockers) were observed during the follow-up period. The cumulative incidences per 1000 persons were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.73-1.85) cases for ACEIs, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69) cases for ARBs, 1.44 (95% CI, 0.58-2.96) cases for aliskiren, and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54-0.61) cases for β-blockers. The incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 4.38 (95% CI, 4.24-4.54) cases for ACEIs, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.47-1.86) cases for ARBs, 4.67 (95% CI, 1.88-9.63) cases for aliskiren, and 1.67 (95% CI, 1.56-1.78) cases for β-blockers. Compared with the use of β-blockers, the adjusted hazard ratios were 3.04 (95% CI, 2.81-3.27) for ACEIs, 1.16 (95% CI, 1.00-1.34) for ARBs, and 2.85 (95% CI, 1.34-6.04) for aliskiren.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with β-blockers, ACEIs or aliskiren was associated with an approximately 3-fold higher risk for angioedema, although the number of exposed events for aliskiren was small. The risk for angioedema was lower with ARBs than with ACEIs or aliskiren.</p>","PeriodicalId":8290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of internal medicine","volume":"172 20","pages":"1582-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.34","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: Although certain drugs that target the renin- angiotensin-aldosterone system are linked to an increased risk for angioedema, data on their absolute and comparative risks are limited. We assessed the risk for angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, inception cohort study of patients 18 years or older from 17 health plans participating in the Mini-Sentinel program who had initiated the use of an ACEI (n = 1 845 138), an ARB (n = 467 313), aliskiren (n = 4867), or a β-blocker (n = 1 592 278) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010. We calculated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of angioedema during a maximal 365-day follow-up period. Using β-blockers as a reference and a propensity score approach, we estimated the hazard ratios of angioedema separately for ACEIs, ARBs, and aliskiren, adjusting for age, sex, history of allergic reactions, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or ischemic heart disease, and the use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Results: A total of 4511 angioedema events (3301 for ACEIs, 288 for ARBs, 7 for aliskiren, and 915 for β-blockers) were observed during the follow-up period. The cumulative incidences per 1000 persons were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.73-1.85) cases for ACEIs, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69) cases for ARBs, 1.44 (95% CI, 0.58-2.96) cases for aliskiren, and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54-0.61) cases for β-blockers. The incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 4.38 (95% CI, 4.24-4.54) cases for ACEIs, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.47-1.86) cases for ARBs, 4.67 (95% CI, 1.88-9.63) cases for aliskiren, and 1.67 (95% CI, 1.56-1.78) cases for β-blockers. Compared with the use of β-blockers, the adjusted hazard ratios were 3.04 (95% CI, 2.81-3.27) for ACEIs, 1.16 (95% CI, 1.00-1.34) for ARBs, and 2.85 (95% CI, 1.34-6.04) for aliskiren.

Conclusions: Compared with β-blockers, ACEIs or aliskiren was associated with an approximately 3-fold higher risk for angioedema, although the number of exposed events for aliskiren was small. The risk for angioedema was lower with ARBs than with ACEIs or aliskiren.

血管水肿的比较风险与使用针对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的药物有关。
背景:虽然某些靶向肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的药物与血管性水肿风险增加有关,但其绝对风险和比较风险的数据有限。我们评估了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和直接肾素抑制剂aliskiren与血管性水肿相关的风险。方法:在2001年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间,我们对参与Mini-Sentinel项目的17个健康计划的18岁及以上患者进行了回顾性、观察性、初始队列研究,这些患者开始使用ACEI (n = 1 845 138)、ARB (n = 467 313)、aliskiren (n = 4867)或β受体阻滞剂(n = 1 592 278)。我们计算了最长365天随访期间血管性水肿的累积发生率和发病率。使用β受体阻滞剂作为参考和倾向评分方法,我们分别估计acei、arb和aliskiren的血管性水肿风险比,调整年龄、性别、过敏反应史、糖尿病、心力衰竭或缺血性心脏病,以及使用处方非甾体类抗炎药。结果:随访期间共观察到4511例血管性水肿事件(acei组3301例,arb组288例,aliskiren组7例,β受体阻滞剂组915例)。acei的累计发病率为每1000人1.79例(95% CI, 1.73-1.85), arb为0.62例(95% CI, 0.55-0.69), aliskiren为1.44例(95% CI, 0.58-2.96), β受体阻滞剂为0.58例(95% CI, 0.54-0.61)。acei的发病率为每1000人年4.38例(95% CI, 4.24-4.54), arb为1.66例(95% CI, 1.47-1.86), aliskiren为4.67例(95% CI, 1.88-9.63), β受体阻滞剂为1.67例(95% CI, 1.56-1.78)。与使用β受体阻滞剂相比,acei的校正风险比为3.04 (95% CI, 2.81-3.27), arb的校正风险比为1.16 (95% CI, 1.00-1.34), aliskiren的校正风险比为2.85 (95% CI, 1.34-6.04)。结论:与β受体阻滞剂相比,乙酰胆碱抑制剂或阿利斯基仑与血管性水肿的风险增加约3倍相关,尽管阿利斯基仑暴露事件的数量很少。arb组血管水肿的风险低于acei组或aliskiren组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of internal medicine
Archives of internal medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信