Quality of health care and the need for assessment.

G Bosse, B Ngoli, M T Leshabari, R Külker, T Dämmrich, W Abels, J P Breuer, R Kersten, C Spies
{"title":"Quality of health care and the need for assessment.","authors":"G Bosse,&nbsp;B Ngoli,&nbsp;M T Leshabari,&nbsp;R Külker,&nbsp;T Dämmrich,&nbsp;W Abels,&nbsp;J P Breuer,&nbsp;R Kersten,&nbsp;C Spies","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In many hospitals of developing countries quality of care is below the expected standard to maintain patient safety. In 2006, health care experts from Tanzania and Germany collaborated on a set of indicators to be used as a hospital performance assessment tool. The aim of this study was to introduce this tool and check its feasibility for use in a Tanzanian regional hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the hospital, independent observers assessed quantitatively structural quality and the performance of health care encounter using an itemized scale from 0 (0%) to 2 (100%) for each defined item. Outcome parameters were taken from the annual hospital report. In addition, semi-qualitative interviews with staff and patients were held to a) assess staff knowledge of the treatment guidelines published by the Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), b) assess attitudes and user motivation and c) authenticate the quantitative findings in a mixed-method triangulation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Structural quality in maternity was at 75% of the expected standard, while process quality ranged from 36% (Care of the newborn with APGAR score < 4) to 47% (normal delivery procedure). Staff knowledge ranged between 64% and 87% with low motivation and commitment given as contributing factors. Outcome (maternal mortality) was 481/100,000 live births with an infant mortality rate of 10%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The tool appeared to be feasible and effective in judging care quality. It provides a model for continuous quality improvement. Motivation of health care workers, a strong determinant of care process quality, might be improved by strengthening internal factors in health facilities. For conclusive validation, further studies using the tool must be conducted with larger numbers of institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87601,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of public health","volume":"8 3","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In many hospitals of developing countries quality of care is below the expected standard to maintain patient safety. In 2006, health care experts from Tanzania and Germany collaborated on a set of indicators to be used as a hospital performance assessment tool. The aim of this study was to introduce this tool and check its feasibility for use in a Tanzanian regional hospital.

Methods: Within the hospital, independent observers assessed quantitatively structural quality and the performance of health care encounter using an itemized scale from 0 (0%) to 2 (100%) for each defined item. Outcome parameters were taken from the annual hospital report. In addition, semi-qualitative interviews with staff and patients were held to a) assess staff knowledge of the treatment guidelines published by the Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), b) assess attitudes and user motivation and c) authenticate the quantitative findings in a mixed-method triangulation approach.

Results: Structural quality in maternity was at 75% of the expected standard, while process quality ranged from 36% (Care of the newborn with APGAR score < 4) to 47% (normal delivery procedure). Staff knowledge ranged between 64% and 87% with low motivation and commitment given as contributing factors. Outcome (maternal mortality) was 481/100,000 live births with an infant mortality rate of 10%.

Discussion: The tool appeared to be feasible and effective in judging care quality. It provides a model for continuous quality improvement. Motivation of health care workers, a strong determinant of care process quality, might be improved by strengthening internal factors in health facilities. For conclusive validation, further studies using the tool must be conducted with larger numbers of institutions.

卫生保健的质量和评估的必要性。
目的:发展中国家许多医院的护理质量低于维持患者安全的预期标准。2006年,坦桑尼亚和德国的保健专家合作制定了一套指标,作为医院绩效评估工具。本研究的目的是介绍这一工具,并检查其在坦桑尼亚地区医院使用的可行性。方法:在医院内,独立观察员对每个定义项目使用从0(0%)到2(100%)的分项量表定量评估结构质量和医疗保健服务的绩效。结果参数取自年度医院报告。此外,还与工作人员和患者进行了半定性访谈,以a)评估工作人员对坦桑尼亚卫生和社会福利部(MoHSW)公布的治疗指南的了解程度,b)评估态度和用户动机,以及c)验证混合方法三角测量方法中的定量结果。结果:产妇的结构质量达到预期标准的75%,而过程质量从36% (APGAR评分< 4的新生儿护理)到47%(正常分娩程序)不等。员工的知识水平在64%至87%之间,其中动机和承诺较低是主要因素。结果(产妇死亡率)为481/10万活产,婴儿死亡率为10%。讨论:该工具在判断护理质量方面似乎是可行和有效的。它为持续的质量改进提供了一个模型。保健工作者的动机是保健过程质量的一个重要决定因素,可以通过加强保健设施的内部因素来改善。为了进行结论性验证,必须在更多的机构中进行使用该工具的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信