Assessing the assumptions of respondent-driven sampling in the national HIV Behavioral Surveillance System among injecting drug users.

The Open AIDS Journal Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-09-07 DOI:10.2174/1874613601206010077
Amy Lansky, Amy Drake, Cyprian Wejnert, Huong Pham, Melissa Cribbin, Douglas D Heckathorn
{"title":"Assessing the assumptions of respondent-driven sampling in the national HIV Behavioral Surveillance System among injecting drug users.","authors":"Amy Lansky,&nbsp;Amy Drake,&nbsp;Cyprian Wejnert,&nbsp;Huong Pham,&nbsp;Melissa Cribbin,&nbsp;Douglas D Heckathorn","doi":"10.2174/1874613601206010077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several assumptions determine whether respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an appropriate sampling method to use with a particular group, including the population being recruited must know one another as members of the group (i.e., injection drug users [IDUs] must know each other as IDUs) and be networked and that the sample size is small relative to the overall size of the group. To assess these three assumptions, we analyzed city-specific data collected using RDS through the US National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System among IDUs in 23 cities. Overall, 5% of non-seed participants reported that their recruiter was \"a stranger.\" 20 cities with multiple field sites had ≥1 cross-recruitment, a proxy for linked networks. Sample sizes were small in relation to the IDU population size (median = 2.3%; range: 0.6%- 8.0%). Researchers must evaluate whether these three assumptions were met to justify the basis for using RDS to sample specific populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":515834,"journal":{"name":"The Open AIDS Journal","volume":"6 ","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/83/TOAIDJ-6-77.PMC3462332.pdf","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open AIDS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Several assumptions determine whether respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an appropriate sampling method to use with a particular group, including the population being recruited must know one another as members of the group (i.e., injection drug users [IDUs] must know each other as IDUs) and be networked and that the sample size is small relative to the overall size of the group. To assess these three assumptions, we analyzed city-specific data collected using RDS through the US National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System among IDUs in 23 cities. Overall, 5% of non-seed participants reported that their recruiter was "a stranger." 20 cities with multiple field sites had ≥1 cross-recruitment, a proxy for linked networks. Sample sizes were small in relation to the IDU population size (median = 2.3%; range: 0.6%- 8.0%). Researchers must evaluate whether these three assumptions were met to justify the basis for using RDS to sample specific populations.

评估国家注射吸毒者艾滋病毒行为监测系统中受访者驱动抽样的假设。
几个假设决定了被调查者驱动抽样(RDS)是否是一种适用于特定群体的适当抽样方法,包括被招募的人口必须彼此认识为该群体的成员(即,注射吸毒者[IDUs]必须彼此认识为IDUs),并联网,以及样本量相对于该群体的总体规模较小。为了评估这三个假设,我们分析了通过美国国家艾滋病毒行为监测系统在23个城市的注射吸毒者中使用RDS收集的城市特定数据。总体而言,5%的非种子参与者报告说他们的招聘人员是“陌生人”。20个有多个站点的城市有≥1个交叉招聘,这是链接网络的一个代表。样本量相对于IDU人群规模较小(中位数= 2.3%;范围:0.6%- 8.0%)。研究人员必须评估这三个假设是否满足,以证明使用RDS对特定人群进行抽样的依据是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信