Use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

András Komócsi, András Vorobcsuk, Dániel Kehl, Dániel Aradi
{"title":"Use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"András Komócsi,&nbsp;András Vorobcsuk,&nbsp;Dániel Kehl,&nbsp;Dániel Aradi","doi":"10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite receipt of dual antiplatelet therapy, patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain at significant risk for thrombotic events. The role of orally activated Xa antagonist (anti-Xa) and direct thrombin inhibitors is debated in this setting. Our study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents compared with placebo in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that evaluated the effects of anti-Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS. Efficacy measures included stent thrombosis, overall mortality, and a composite end point of major ischemic events, while thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-defined major bleeding events were used as a safety end point. The net clinical benefit was calculated as the sum of composite ischemic events and major bleeding events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the period January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2011, we identified 7 prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that met the study criteria, involving 31 286 patients. Based on the pooled results, the use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS was associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.20-4.16; P < .001). Significant but moderate reductions in the risk for stent thrombosis or composite ischemic events were observed, without a significant effect on overall mortality. For the net clinical benefit, treatment with new-generation oral anticoagulant agents provided no advantage over placebo (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06; P = .57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of anti-Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors is associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events, which might offset all ischemic benefits in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of internal medicine","volume":"172 20","pages":"1537-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4026","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

Background: Despite receipt of dual antiplatelet therapy, patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain at significant risk for thrombotic events. The role of orally activated Xa antagonist (anti-Xa) and direct thrombin inhibitors is debated in this setting. Our study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents compared with placebo in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that evaluated the effects of anti-Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS. Efficacy measures included stent thrombosis, overall mortality, and a composite end point of major ischemic events, while thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-defined major bleeding events were used as a safety end point. The net clinical benefit was calculated as the sum of composite ischemic events and major bleeding events.

Results: For the period January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2011, we identified 7 prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that met the study criteria, involving 31 286 patients. Based on the pooled results, the use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS was associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.20-4.16; P < .001). Significant but moderate reductions in the risk for stent thrombosis or composite ischemic events were observed, without a significant effect on overall mortality. For the net clinical benefit, treatment with new-generation oral anticoagulant agents provided no advantage over placebo (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06; P = .57).

Conclusion: The use of anti-Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors is associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events, which might offset all ischemic benefits in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS.

新一代口服抗凝药物在急性冠状动脉综合征后接受抗血小板治疗的患者中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:尽管接受了双重抗血小板治疗,急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者发生血栓事件的风险仍然很高。口服激活的Xa拮抗剂(抗Xa)和直接凝血酶抑制剂的作用在这种情况下存在争议。我们的研究目的是评价新一代口服抗凝药物与安慰剂在ACS后接受抗血小板治疗的患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:检索电子数据库,以确定前瞻性随机安慰剂对照临床试验,评估抗xa或直接凝血酶抑制剂在ACS后接受抗血小板治疗的患者中的作用。疗效指标包括支架血栓形成、总死亡率和主要缺血事件的复合终点,而心肌梗死定义的主要出血事件的溶栓被用作安全性终点。净临床获益计算为复合缺血事件和主要出血事件的总和。结果:在2000年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间,我们确定了7项符合研究标准的前瞻性随机安慰剂对照临床试验,涉及31 286例患者。基于综合结果,ACS后接受抗血小板治疗的患者使用新一代口服抗凝药物与大出血事件的显著增加相关(优势比,3.03;95% ci, 2.20-4.16;P < 0.001)。观察到支架血栓形成或复合缺血事件的风险有显著但中等程度的降低,但对总死亡率没有显著影响。对于净临床获益,新一代口服抗凝药物治疗与安慰剂相比没有优势(优势比,0.98;95% ci, 0.90-1.06;P = .57)。结论:使用抗xa或直接凝血酶抑制剂与大出血事件的急剧增加相关,这可能抵消ACS后接受抗血小板治疗的患者的所有缺血性益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of internal medicine
Archives of internal medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信