Blood pressure, heart rate, and urinary catecholamines in healthy dogs subjected to different clinical settings.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学
K Höglund, S Hanås, C Carnabuci, I Ljungvall, A Tidholm, J Häggström
{"title":"Blood pressure, heart rate, and urinary catecholamines in healthy dogs subjected to different clinical settings.","authors":"K Höglund,&nbsp;S Hanås,&nbsp;C Carnabuci,&nbsp;I Ljungvall,&nbsp;A Tidholm,&nbsp;J Häggström","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00999.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correct interpretation of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) recordings is important in a clinical environment, but little is known about effects of stress on BP and HR responses of dogs to different clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate BP and HR responses in different clinical settings in dogs of 3 breeds, and to relate findings to urinary catecholamine concentrations measured by ELISA assays previously validated for use in human plasma and urine, after validation for use in dogs.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Client-owned healthy dogs; 41 Labrador Retrievers, 33 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS), and 15 Dachshunds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study. BP and HR were measured in 4 clinical settings with or without veterinarian and owner present. Urine samples were taken before and after examination. ELISA assays were validated for canine urine, and epinephrine/creatinine and norepinephrine/creatinine ratios were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BP and HR were higher when measured by veterinarian alone than when owner was present (P < .020). Urinary catecholamine/creatinine ratios were higher after examination, compared with before, in all dogs (P < .0001). Labrador Retrievers had lower diastolic BP than Dachshunds in 2 settings (P ≤ .041), lower HR than CKCSs in 3 settings (all P < .0001), and lower catecholamine/creatinine ratios after examination than both other breeds (P ≤ .035). The in-house validation showed mean spiked recovery of 96.5% for epinephrine and 83.8% for norepinephrine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>BP and HR responses were related to breed as well as clinical setting. Breed differences were detected in urinary catecholamine/creatinine ratios. Further studies on breed differences are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"1300-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00999.x","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00999.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Background: Correct interpretation of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) recordings is important in a clinical environment, but little is known about effects of stress on BP and HR responses of dogs to different clinical settings.

Objective: To investigate BP and HR responses in different clinical settings in dogs of 3 breeds, and to relate findings to urinary catecholamine concentrations measured by ELISA assays previously validated for use in human plasma and urine, after validation for use in dogs.

Animals: Client-owned healthy dogs; 41 Labrador Retrievers, 33 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS), and 15 Dachshunds.

Methods: Prospective observational study. BP and HR were measured in 4 clinical settings with or without veterinarian and owner present. Urine samples were taken before and after examination. ELISA assays were validated for canine urine, and epinephrine/creatinine and norepinephrine/creatinine ratios were analyzed.

Results: BP and HR were higher when measured by veterinarian alone than when owner was present (P < .020). Urinary catecholamine/creatinine ratios were higher after examination, compared with before, in all dogs (P < .0001). Labrador Retrievers had lower diastolic BP than Dachshunds in 2 settings (P ≤ .041), lower HR than CKCSs in 3 settings (all P < .0001), and lower catecholamine/creatinine ratios after examination than both other breeds (P ≤ .035). The in-house validation showed mean spiked recovery of 96.5% for epinephrine and 83.8% for norepinephrine.

Conclusions and clinical importance: BP and HR responses were related to breed as well as clinical setting. Breed differences were detected in urinary catecholamine/creatinine ratios. Further studies on breed differences are warranted.

不同临床环境下健康狗的血压、心率和尿儿茶酚胺。
背景:正确解读血压(BP)和心率(HR)记录在临床环境中很重要,但对于应激对不同临床环境下狗的血压和心率反应的影响知之甚少。目的:研究3个品种犬在不同临床环境下的血压和HR反应,并将结果与之前已验证用于人血浆和尿液的ELISA测定的尿儿茶酚胺浓度联系起来。动物:客户拥有的健康狗;41只拉布拉多寻回犬,33只骑士查尔斯国王猎犬和15只腊肠犬。方法:前瞻性观察研究。在有或没有兽医和饲主在场的4个临床环境中测量血压和心率。检查前后分别取尿样。验证了犬尿的酶联免疫吸附试验,并分析了肾上腺素/肌酐和去甲肾上腺素/肌酐比值。结果:与主人在场时相比,兽医单独测量的血压和HR更高(P < 0.020)。检查后,所有犬的尿儿茶酚胺/肌酐比值均高于检查前(P < 0.0001)。拉布拉多猎犬的舒张压在2种情况下低于腊肠犬(P≤0.041),HR在3种情况下低于CKCSs (P < 0.0001),儿茶酚胺/肌酐比值低于其他品种(P≤0.035)。内部验证表明,肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的平均加标回收率分别为96.5%和83.8%。结论及临床意义:血压和HR反应与品种和临床环境有关。尿儿茶酚胺/肌酐比值存在品种差异。品种差异的进一步研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Veterinary-General Veterinary
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信