Impact of the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act on abdominal ultrasonography use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Jacqueline Baras Shreibati, Laurence C Baker, Mark A Hlatky, Matthew W Mell
{"title":"Impact of the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act on abdominal ultrasonography use among Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Jacqueline Baras Shreibati,&nbsp;Laurence C Baker,&nbsp;Mark A Hlatky,&nbsp;Matthew W Mell","doi":"10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since January 1, 2007, Medicare has covered abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening for new male enrollees with a history of smoking under the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act. We examined the association between this program and abdominal ultrasonography for AAA screening, elective AAA repair, hospitalization for AAA rupture, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 20% sample of traditional Medicare enrollees from 2004 to 2008 to identify 65-year-old men eligible for screening and 3 control groups not eligible for screening (70-year-old men, 76-year-old men, and 65-year-old women). We used logistic regression to examine the change in outcomes at 365 days for eligible vs ineligible beneficiaries before and after SAAAVE Act implementation, adjusting for comorbidities, state-level smoking prevalence, geographic variation, and time trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer than 3% of abdominal ultrasonography claims after 2007 were for SAAAVE-specific AAA screening. There was a significantly greater increase in abdominal ultrasonography use among SAAAVE-eligible beneficiaries (2.0 percentage points among 65-year-old men, from 7.6% in 2004 to 9.6% in 2008; 0.7 points [8.9% to 9.6%] among 70-year-old men; 0.7 points [10.8% to 11.5%] among 76-year-old men; and 0.9 points [7.5% to 8.4%] among 65-year-old women) (P < .001 for all comparisons with 65-year-old men). The SAAAVE Act was associated with increased use of abdominal ultrasonography in 65-year-old men compared with 70-year-old men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.19) (P < .001), and this increased use remained even when SAAAVE-specific AAA screening was excluded (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16) (P < .001). Implementation of the SAAAVE Act was not associated with changes in rates of AAA repair, AAA rupture, or all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of the SAAAVE Act on AAA screening was modest and was based on abdominal ultrasonography use that it did not directly reimburse. The SAAAVE Act had no discernable effect on AAA rupture or all-cause morality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of internal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4268","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Background: Since January 1, 2007, Medicare has covered abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening for new male enrollees with a history of smoking under the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act. We examined the association between this program and abdominal ultrasonography for AAA screening, elective AAA repair, hospitalization for AAA rupture, and all-cause mortality.

Methods: We used a 20% sample of traditional Medicare enrollees from 2004 to 2008 to identify 65-year-old men eligible for screening and 3 control groups not eligible for screening (70-year-old men, 76-year-old men, and 65-year-old women). We used logistic regression to examine the change in outcomes at 365 days for eligible vs ineligible beneficiaries before and after SAAAVE Act implementation, adjusting for comorbidities, state-level smoking prevalence, geographic variation, and time trends.

Results: Fewer than 3% of abdominal ultrasonography claims after 2007 were for SAAAVE-specific AAA screening. There was a significantly greater increase in abdominal ultrasonography use among SAAAVE-eligible beneficiaries (2.0 percentage points among 65-year-old men, from 7.6% in 2004 to 9.6% in 2008; 0.7 points [8.9% to 9.6%] among 70-year-old men; 0.7 points [10.8% to 11.5%] among 76-year-old men; and 0.9 points [7.5% to 8.4%] among 65-year-old women) (P < .001 for all comparisons with 65-year-old men). The SAAAVE Act was associated with increased use of abdominal ultrasonography in 65-year-old men compared with 70-year-old men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.19) (P < .001), and this increased use remained even when SAAAVE-specific AAA screening was excluded (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16) (P < .001). Implementation of the SAAAVE Act was not associated with changes in rates of AAA repair, AAA rupture, or all-cause mortality.

Conclusions: The impact of the SAAAVE Act on AAA screening was modest and was based on abdominal ultrasonography use that it did not directly reimburse. The SAAAVE Act had no discernable effect on AAA rupture or all-cause morality.

非常有效地筛选腹主动脉瘤(SAAAVE)法案对腹部超声检查在医疗保险受益人中的使用的影响。
背景:自2007年1月1日起,根据《高效腹主动脉瘤筛查法案》(SAAAVE),医疗保险对有吸烟史的男性新入选者进行了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查。我们研究了该方案与腹部超声检查AAA筛查、选择性AAA修复、AAA破裂住院和全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:我们使用2004年至2008年20%的传统医疗保险参保者样本来确定符合筛查条件的65岁男性和3个不符合筛查条件的对照组(70岁男性、76岁男性和65岁女性)。我们使用逻辑回归来检查在SAAAVE法案实施前后,符合条件的受益人与不符合条件的受益人在365天内的结果变化,调整了合并症、州水平的吸烟率、地理差异和时间趋势。结果:2007年以后,腹部超声检查中只有不到3%是针对saaave特异性的AAA筛查。在符合saaave条件的受益人中,腹部超声检查的使用明显增加(65岁男性中2.0个百分点,从2004年的7.6%增加到2008年的9.6%;70岁男性为0.7分(8.9% - 9.6%);76岁男性为0.7分(10.8%至11.5%);65岁女性为0.9分[7.5%至8.4%])(与65岁男性的所有比较P < 0.001)。与70岁男性相比,SAAAVE法案与65岁男性腹部超声检查的使用增加有关(调整优势比[AOR], 1.15;95% CI, 1.11-1.19) (P < 0.001),即使排除saaave特异性AAA筛查,这种增加的使用仍然存在(AOR, 1.12;95% ci, 1.08-1.16) (p < 0.001)。SAAAVE法案的实施与AAA级修复率、AAA级破裂率或全因死亡率的变化无关。结论:SAAAVE法案对AAA筛查的影响是适度的,并且是基于腹部超声检查的使用,它没有直接报销。SAAAVE法案对AAA破裂或全因道德没有明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of internal medicine
Archives of internal medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信