Residue levels of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane and chronic dietary risk assessment for different populations

IF 4.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Chuanying Cheng, Jiye Hu
{"title":"Residue levels of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane and chronic dietary risk assessment for different populations","authors":"Chuanying Cheng,&nbsp;Jiye Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.microc.2022.107936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To determine the residue levels of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane and to assess the corresponding chronic dietary risk, field trials and analyses of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane were conducted in 2019 in China. A QuEChERS method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of these two compounds in rice and sugar cane<strong>,</strong> and field samples, including brown rice, rice husk and straw from 12 rice field trials and sugar cane from 6 field trials, were further analysed. The highest residue levels of chlorantraniliprole were 0.01 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> in brown rice and 0.12 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> in paddy rice at harvest time, and the highest residue levels of clothianidin reached 0.01 and 0.02 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>. The highest residue levels of these two pesticides in sugar cane were no higher than 0.01 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> at harvest time. Therefore, the terminal residue levels of these two pesticides in these matrixes were all lower than their corresponding maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by China. Then, the chronic dietary risk for the Chinese population was assessed according to the place of residence, sex, age, residue level and toxicology data. The results demonstrated that the chronic risk quotient values of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin were all lower than 100 %. Therefore, these two pesticides pose no significant potential risks to Chinese consumers at the recommended application levels. These results can guide the safe application of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":391,"journal":{"name":"Microchemical Journal","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107936"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microchemical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X22007640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

To determine the residue levels of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane and to assess the corresponding chronic dietary risk, field trials and analyses of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in rice and sugar cane were conducted in 2019 in China. A QuEChERS method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of these two compounds in rice and sugar cane, and field samples, including brown rice, rice husk and straw from 12 rice field trials and sugar cane from 6 field trials, were further analysed. The highest residue levels of chlorantraniliprole were 0.01 mg kg−1 in brown rice and 0.12 mg kg−1 in paddy rice at harvest time, and the highest residue levels of clothianidin reached 0.01 and 0.02 mg kg−1. The highest residue levels of these two pesticides in sugar cane were no higher than 0.01 mg kg−1 at harvest time. Therefore, the terminal residue levels of these two pesticides in these matrixes were all lower than their corresponding maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by China. Then, the chronic dietary risk for the Chinese population was assessed according to the place of residence, sex, age, residue level and toxicology data. The results demonstrated that the chronic risk quotient values of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin were all lower than 100 %. Therefore, these two pesticides pose no significant potential risks to Chinese consumers at the recommended application levels. These results can guide the safe application of chlorantraniliprole and clothianidin in China.

Abstract Image

水稻和甘蔗中氯虫腈和噻虫胺的残留水平及不同人群慢性饮食风险评估
为确定氯虫腈和噻虫胺在水稻和甘蔗中的残留水平,并评估相应的慢性膳食风险,2019年在中国水稻和甘蔗中进行了氯虫腈和噻虫胺的田间试验和分析。建立了高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS /MS)结合QuEChERS方法同时测定水稻和甘蔗中这两种化合物的含量,并对12个水稻试验的糙米、稻壳和秸秆以及6个大田试验的甘蔗样品进行了分析。收获期糙米和水稻中氯虫腈的最高残留量分别为0.01 mg kg - 1和0.12 mg kg - 1,噻虫胺的最高残留量分别为0.01和0.02 mg kg - 1。两种农药在甘蔗收获时的最高残留量均不高于0.01 mg kg - 1。因此,这两种农药在这些基质中的末端残留水平均低于中国规定的最大残留限量(MRLs)。然后,根据居住地、性别、年龄、残留水平和毒理学数据评估中国人群的慢性饮食风险。结果表明,氯虫腈和噻虫胺的慢性风险商值均小于100%。因此,在推荐用量下,这两种农药对中国消费者不构成显著的潜在风险。这些结果可以指导氯虫腈和噻虫胺在中国的安全应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microchemical Journal
Microchemical Journal 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1131
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Microchemical Journal is a peer reviewed journal devoted to all aspects and phases of analytical chemistry and chemical analysis. The Microchemical Journal publishes articles which are at the forefront of modern analytical chemistry and cover innovations in the techniques to the finest possible limits. This includes fundamental aspects, instrumentation, new developments, innovative and novel methods and applications including environmental and clinical field. Traditional classical analytical methods such as spectrophotometry and titrimetry as well as established instrumentation methods such as flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, gas chromatography, and modified glassy or carbon electrode electrochemical methods will be considered, provided they show significant improvements and novelty compared to the established methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信