Long-term outcomes of hepatic arterial port implantation using a coaxial microcatheter system in 176 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Q4 Medicine
Masaki Ishikawa, Hideaki Kakizawa, Masashi Hieda, Naoyuki Toyota, Yoshio Katamura, Hiroshi Aikata, Kazuaki Chayama, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of hepatic arterial port implantation using a coaxial microcatheter system in 176 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Masaki Ishikawa,&nbsp;Hideaki Kakizawa,&nbsp;Masashi Hieda,&nbsp;Naoyuki Toyota,&nbsp;Yoshio Katamura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Aikata,&nbsp;Kazuaki Chayama,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of hepatic arterial port implantation using a 2.9-Fr coaxial microcatheter for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the long-term follow-up period. Our study subjects were 176 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent hepatic arterial port implantation using a 2.9-Fr coaxial microcatheter via the femoral approach. A 2.9-Fr microcatheter with a side hole was introduced into the hepatic artery through a 5-Fr catheter. We determined the possible length of HAIC, starting with hepatic arterial port implantation and ending with the manifestation of technical difficulties or patient death. We also recorded the technical success rate, the time required for the procedure, and the complications encountered. The median duration of HAIC was 4.3 months (range 0.4-51.6 months) and the predictable cumulative rate of hepatic arterial port functioning at 6-, 12-, and 24 months was 75.1%, 60.9%, and 44.6%, respectively. Our technical success rate was 99.4% (175/176), and the mean time required for the procedure was 121 min. Complications were migration of the infusion hole (8.6%, 15/175), hepatic artery damage (5.7%, 10/175), port-catheter system occlusion (5.7%, 10/175), and problems involving the port or the puncture site (8.0%, 14/175). Our study demonstrates that the technical success rate of hepatic arterial port implantation using a coaxial microcatheter was high but that the incidence of port-catheter system occlusion and catheter dislocation was higher than in conventional methods. Our technique is another option to treat patients with HCC for whom conventional techniques cannot be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":12860,"journal":{"name":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","volume":"61 1","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of hepatic arterial port implantation using a 2.9-Fr coaxial microcatheter for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the long-term follow-up period. Our study subjects were 176 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent hepatic arterial port implantation using a 2.9-Fr coaxial microcatheter via the femoral approach. A 2.9-Fr microcatheter with a side hole was introduced into the hepatic artery through a 5-Fr catheter. We determined the possible length of HAIC, starting with hepatic arterial port implantation and ending with the manifestation of technical difficulties or patient death. We also recorded the technical success rate, the time required for the procedure, and the complications encountered. The median duration of HAIC was 4.3 months (range 0.4-51.6 months) and the predictable cumulative rate of hepatic arterial port functioning at 6-, 12-, and 24 months was 75.1%, 60.9%, and 44.6%, respectively. Our technical success rate was 99.4% (175/176), and the mean time required for the procedure was 121 min. Complications were migration of the infusion hole (8.6%, 15/175), hepatic artery damage (5.7%, 10/175), port-catheter system occlusion (5.7%, 10/175), and problems involving the port or the puncture site (8.0%, 14/175). Our study demonstrates that the technical success rate of hepatic arterial port implantation using a coaxial microcatheter was high but that the incidence of port-catheter system occlusion and catheter dislocation was higher than in conventional methods. Our technique is another option to treat patients with HCC for whom conventional techniques cannot be used.

用同轴微导管系统植入176例肝癌肝动脉的长期疗效观察。
本研究的目的是在长期随访中评估在不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中使用2.9 fr同轴微导管进行肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)的可行性。我们的研究对象是176例不可切除的HCC患者,他们使用2.9 fr同轴微导管经股动脉入路行肝动脉口植入术。通过5-Fr导管将带侧孔的2.9 fr微导管引入肝动脉。我们确定了HAIC的可能长度,从肝动脉端口植入开始,到出现技术困难或患者死亡结束。我们还记录了技术成功率、手术所需时间和遇到的并发症。HAIC的中位持续时间为4.3个月(范围0.4-51.6个月),6个月、12个月和24个月的肝动脉功能可预测累积率分别为75.1%、60.9%和44.6%。我们的技术成功率为99.4%(175/176),平均所需时间为121分钟。并发症为输液孔移位(8.6%,15/175),肝动脉损伤(5.7%,10/175),端口-导管系统闭塞(5.7%,10/175),以及涉及端口或穿刺部位的问题(8.0%,14/175)。我们的研究表明,使用同轴微导管进行肝动脉端口植入的技术成功率很高,但端口-导管系统闭塞和导管脱位的发生率高于传统方法。我们的技术是治疗传统技术无法治疗的HCC患者的另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信