Prostate cancer gene 3 urine assay cutoff in diagnosis of prostate cancer: a validation study on an Italian patient population undergoing first and repeat biopsy.

Enrico Bollito, Stefano De Luca, Matteo Cicilano, Roberto Passera, Susanna Grande, Carmen Maccagnano, Susanna Cappia, Angela Milillo, Francesco Montorsi, Roberto Mario Scarpa, Mauro Papotti, Donato Franco Randone
{"title":"Prostate cancer gene 3 urine assay cutoff in diagnosis of prostate cancer: a validation study on an Italian patient population undergoing first and repeat biopsy.","authors":"Enrico Bollito,&nbsp;Stefano De Luca,&nbsp;Matteo Cicilano,&nbsp;Roberto Passera,&nbsp;Susanna Grande,&nbsp;Carmen Maccagnano,&nbsp;Susanna Cappia,&nbsp;Angela Milillo,&nbsp;Francesco Montorsi,&nbsp;Roberto Mario Scarpa,&nbsp;Mauro Papotti,&nbsp;Donato Franco Randone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine an optimal prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) cutoff in predicting prostate cancer in Italian patients undergoing first or repeat biopsy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this observational multicenter study 1246 men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and negative digital rectal examination, with prostate biopsy after PCA3 assessment, were divided into two groups submitted to PCA3 testing before or after previous negative biopsies. Ideal PCA3 cutoff was identified using area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Various cutoff values were used to determine the best predictive score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models compared age, PSA, free-PSA, and PCA3 score to predict prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA3 cutoff 39-50 had the highest accuracy in the repeat biopsy group in which cutoff of 39 could have avoided 51.9% negative repeat biopsies, eventually missing 7.8% of cancers (all low risk); cutoff of 50 would have prevented 56.5% of negative repeat biopsies, missing 29 tumors (10.3%), 5 potentially aggressive. The PCA3 test performed poorly in the first biopsy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We confirm the usefulness of PCA3 in Italian men with a previous negative biopsy. We achieved the best performance at a cutoff of 39. PCA3 did not perform better than PSA in non-biopsy-selected men.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"34 2","pages":"96-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine an optimal prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) cutoff in predicting prostate cancer in Italian patients undergoing first or repeat biopsy.

Study design: In this observational multicenter study 1246 men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and negative digital rectal examination, with prostate biopsy after PCA3 assessment, were divided into two groups submitted to PCA3 testing before or after previous negative biopsies. Ideal PCA3 cutoff was identified using area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Various cutoff values were used to determine the best predictive score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models compared age, PSA, free-PSA, and PCA3 score to predict prostate cancer.

Results: PCA3 cutoff 39-50 had the highest accuracy in the repeat biopsy group in which cutoff of 39 could have avoided 51.9% negative repeat biopsies, eventually missing 7.8% of cancers (all low risk); cutoff of 50 would have prevented 56.5% of negative repeat biopsies, missing 29 tumors (10.3%), 5 potentially aggressive. The PCA3 test performed poorly in the first biopsy group.

Conclusion: We confirm the usefulness of PCA3 in Italian men with a previous negative biopsy. We achieved the best performance at a cutoff of 39. PCA3 did not perform better than PSA in non-biopsy-selected men.

前列腺癌基因3尿检测在前列腺癌诊断中的切断:一项对意大利患者进行首次和重复活检的验证研究。
目的:确定前列腺癌基因3 (PCA3)预测意大利首次或重复活检患者前列腺癌的最佳截止点。研究设计:在这项观察性多中心研究中,1246名前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高且直肠指检阴性的男性,在PCA3评估后进行前列腺活检,被分为两组,在之前或之后进行PCA3检测。利用接收机工作特性分析曲线下面积确定理想PCA3截止点。使用不同的截止值来确定最佳预测评分。单因素和多因素logistic回归模型比较了年龄、PSA、游离PSA和PCA3评分对前列腺癌的预测。结果:PCA3 cut - 39-50在重复活检组准确率最高,其中cut - 39可避免51.9%的阴性重复活检,最终遗漏7.8%的癌症(均为低风险);50的截断率将阻止56.5%的阴性重复活检,遗漏29个肿瘤(10.3%),5个潜在的侵袭性肿瘤。PCA3检测在第一次活检组表现不佳。结论:我们确认PCA3在既往活检阴性的意大利男性中的有用性。我们以39分的分数线取得了最好的成绩。在非活检选择的男性中,PCA3的表现并不比PSA好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信