Bangladesh arsenic mitigation programs: lessons from the past.

Emerging health threats journal Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-30 DOI:10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7269
Abul Hasnat Milton, Samar Kumar Hore, Mohammad Zahid Hossain, Mahfuzar Rahman
{"title":"Bangladesh arsenic mitigation programs: lessons from the past.","authors":"Abul Hasnat Milton,&nbsp;Samar Kumar Hore,&nbsp;Mohammad Zahid Hossain,&nbsp;Mahfuzar Rahman","doi":"10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ensuring access to safe drinking water by 2015 is a global commitment by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In Bangladesh, significant achievements in providing safe water were made earlier by nationwide tubewell-installation programme. This achievement was overshadowed in 1993 by the presence of arsenic in underground water. A total of 6 million tubewells have been tested for arsenic since then, the results of which warranted immediate mitigation. Mitigation measures included tubewell testing and replacing; usage of deeper wells; surface water preservation and treatment; use of sanitary dug wells, river sand and pond sand filters; rainwater collection and storage; household-scale and large-scale arsenic filtrations; and rural pipeline water supply installation. Shallow tubewell installation was discouraged. Efforts have been made to increase people's awareness. This paper describes the lessons learned about mitigation efforts by the authors from experience of arsenic-related work. In spite of national mitigation plans and efforts, a few challenges still persist: inadequate coordination between stakeholders, differences in inter-sectoral attitudes, inadequate research to identify region-specific, suitable safe water options, poor quality of works by various implementing agencies, and inadequate dissemination of the knowledge and experiences to the people by those organizations. Issues such as long-time adaptation using ground water, poor surface water quality including bad smell and turbidity, and refusal to using neighbor's water have delayed mitigation measures so far. Region-specific mitigation water supply policy led by the health sector could be adopted with multisectoral involvement and responsibility. Large-scale piped water supply could be arranged through Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in new national approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":72898,"journal":{"name":"Emerging health threats journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7269","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging health threats journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Ensuring access to safe drinking water by 2015 is a global commitment by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In Bangladesh, significant achievements in providing safe water were made earlier by nationwide tubewell-installation programme. This achievement was overshadowed in 1993 by the presence of arsenic in underground water. A total of 6 million tubewells have been tested for arsenic since then, the results of which warranted immediate mitigation. Mitigation measures included tubewell testing and replacing; usage of deeper wells; surface water preservation and treatment; use of sanitary dug wells, river sand and pond sand filters; rainwater collection and storage; household-scale and large-scale arsenic filtrations; and rural pipeline water supply installation. Shallow tubewell installation was discouraged. Efforts have been made to increase people's awareness. This paper describes the lessons learned about mitigation efforts by the authors from experience of arsenic-related work. In spite of national mitigation plans and efforts, a few challenges still persist: inadequate coordination between stakeholders, differences in inter-sectoral attitudes, inadequate research to identify region-specific, suitable safe water options, poor quality of works by various implementing agencies, and inadequate dissemination of the knowledge and experiences to the people by those organizations. Issues such as long-time adaptation using ground water, poor surface water quality including bad smell and turbidity, and refusal to using neighbor's water have delayed mitigation measures so far. Region-specific mitigation water supply policy led by the health sector could be adopted with multisectoral involvement and responsibility. Large-scale piped water supply could be arranged through Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in new national approach.

孟加拉国砷缓解计划:从过去吸取的教训。
确保到2015年获得安全饮用水是千年发展目标的一项全球承诺。在孟加拉国,早些时候通过全国管井安装方案在提供安全用水方面取得了重大成就。这一成就在1993年因地下水中砷的存在而黯然失色。从那时起,总共对600万口管井进行了砷检测,结果表明有必要立即采取缓解措施。缓解措施包括管井测试和更换;深井的使用;地表水的保存和处理;使用卫生挖井、河砂和池塘砂过滤器;雨水收集和储存;家庭规模和大规模砷过滤;及农村管道供水安装。浅管井不鼓励安装。已经做出了努力来提高人们的意识。本文介绍了作者从与砷有关的工作经验中获得的缓解努力的经验教训。尽管有国家缓解计划和努力,但仍然存在一些挑战:利益攸关方之间协调不足、部门间态度不同、为确定适合区域的安全用水选择进行的研究不足、各执行机构的工作质量差、以及这些组织向人民传播知识和经验不足。长期使用地下水、地表水水质差(包括恶臭和浑浊)以及拒绝使用邻居的水等问题,迄今为止推迟了缓解措施。可在多部门参与和承担责任的情况下,采用由卫生部门主导的区域缓解供水政策。在新的国家模式下,可以通过公私合作(PPP)安排大规模的管道供水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信