Living kidney donor advocacy program: a quality improvement project.

Marcia Sue Dewolf Bosek, Isabelle L Sargeant
{"title":"Living kidney donor advocacy program: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Marcia Sue Dewolf Bosek,&nbsp;Isabelle L Sargeant","doi":"10.1097/NHL.0b013e318247689b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>: In 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandated that kidney transplant programs establish a living donor advocate program to ensure safe care and support for living organ donors. This quality improvement project assessed the impact of establishing a living donor advocate program and identified the ethical commitments and threats living kidney donors perceive throughout the donation process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>: This quality improvement project reflects a mixed-methods methodology. Qualitative as well as quantitative data were generated through the donor-advocate consultation sessions and the written Living Donor Satisfaction Survey. Thirteen living donors participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: No threats to donor rights were identified by either the donor or the advocate. Nonrelated donors were motivated by altruism, whereas related donors were motivated by a sense of family. A majority of donors reported being changed emotionally and spiritually by the act of serving as a living donor. The living kidney donors were overwhelmingly extremely satisfied with their decision to donate and perceived the living donor advocacy program as being very good.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>: Questions have been raised about what role the donor's spouse should have during the informed consent process. Further research is needed to better understand the role and power of an advocate when threats to the donor's rights are noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":80291,"journal":{"name":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","volume":"14 1","pages":"19-26; quiz 27-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NHL.0b013e318247689b","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NHL.0b013e318247689b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: : In 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandated that kidney transplant programs establish a living donor advocate program to ensure safe care and support for living organ donors. This quality improvement project assessed the impact of establishing a living donor advocate program and identified the ethical commitments and threats living kidney donors perceive throughout the donation process.

Method: : This quality improvement project reflects a mixed-methods methodology. Qualitative as well as quantitative data were generated through the donor-advocate consultation sessions and the written Living Donor Satisfaction Survey. Thirteen living donors participated.

Results: : No threats to donor rights were identified by either the donor or the advocate. Nonrelated donors were motivated by altruism, whereas related donors were motivated by a sense of family. A majority of donors reported being changed emotionally and spiritually by the act of serving as a living donor. The living kidney donors were overwhelmingly extremely satisfied with their decision to donate and perceived the living donor advocacy program as being very good.

Discussion: : Questions have been raised about what role the donor's spouse should have during the informed consent process. Further research is needed to better understand the role and power of an advocate when threats to the donor's rights are noted.

活体肾脏捐赠者倡导项目:质量改善项目。
目标:2007年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心要求肾脏移植项目建立一个活体捐赠者倡导项目,以确保对活体器官捐赠者的安全护理和支持。这个质量改进项目评估了建立活体肾脏捐赠倡导项目的影响,并确定了活体肾脏捐赠者在整个捐赠过程中所感受到的道德承诺和威胁。方法:这个质量改进项目反映了一种混合方法方法学。。定性和定量数据是通过捐助者-倡导者咨询会议和书面的活体捐助者满意度调查产生的。有13名活体捐赠者参与。结果:无论是捐赠人还是倡导者都没有发现对捐赠人权利的威胁。。非亲属捐赠者的动机是利他主义,而亲属捐赠者的动机是家庭意识。大多数捐赠者报告说,作为活体捐赠者的行为在情感和精神上都发生了变化。活体肾脏捐赠者对他们的捐赠决定非常满意,并认为活体肾脏捐赠者的宣传项目非常好。讨论:有人提出了关于捐赠者配偶在知情同意过程中应发挥何种作用的问题。。当注意到对捐赠者权利的威胁时,需要进一步研究以更好地了解倡导者的作用和力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书