Line Kjær, Mikkel Fode, Nis Nørgaard, Jens Sønksen, Jørgen Nordling
{"title":"Adjustable continence balloons: clinical results of a new minimally invasive treatment for male urinary incontinence.","authors":"Line Kjær, Mikkel Fode, Nis Nørgaard, Jens Sønksen, Jørgen Nordling","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2012.660986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the results of the Danish experience with the ProACT urinary continence device inserted in men with stress urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The ProACT was inserted in 114 patients. Data were registered prospectively. The main endpoints were complications, pad use per day and 24 h urinary leakage. A questionnaire evaluating symptoms and satisfaction was sent to the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data including preoperative and postoperative pad use and urinary leakage were available for 92 and 90 patients, respectively. A decrease in the median 24 h urinary leakage (352.5 vs 11 ml, p < 0.001) and in the median number of pads used per day (4.75 vs 2.25, p = 0.001) was demonstrated. Forty-six patients had a pad use of 0-1 pads per day and/or a daily urinary leakage less than 8 g, corresponding to an overall dry rate of 50%. A decrease in urinary leakage > 50% was seen in 72 patients (80%). Complications were seen in 23 patients. All of these were treated successfully by removal of the device in the outpatient setting followed by replacement of the device. Another eight patients had a third balloon inserted to improve continence further. Fourteen patients (12%) ended up with an artificial sphincter or a urethral sling. Sixty patients (63%) experienced no discomfort and 58 (61%) reported being dry or markedly improved. Overall, 50 patients (53%) reported being very or predominantly satisfied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjustable continence balloons seem to be a good alternative in the treatment of male urinary incontinence. Complications are mild and easily treated.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"46 3","pages":"196-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2012.660986","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.660986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of the Danish experience with the ProACT urinary continence device inserted in men with stress urinary incontinence.
Material and methods: The ProACT was inserted in 114 patients. Data were registered prospectively. The main endpoints were complications, pad use per day and 24 h urinary leakage. A questionnaire evaluating symptoms and satisfaction was sent to the patients.
Results: Data including preoperative and postoperative pad use and urinary leakage were available for 92 and 90 patients, respectively. A decrease in the median 24 h urinary leakage (352.5 vs 11 ml, p < 0.001) and in the median number of pads used per day (4.75 vs 2.25, p = 0.001) was demonstrated. Forty-six patients had a pad use of 0-1 pads per day and/or a daily urinary leakage less than 8 g, corresponding to an overall dry rate of 50%. A decrease in urinary leakage > 50% was seen in 72 patients (80%). Complications were seen in 23 patients. All of these were treated successfully by removal of the device in the outpatient setting followed by replacement of the device. Another eight patients had a third balloon inserted to improve continence further. Fourteen patients (12%) ended up with an artificial sphincter or a urethral sling. Sixty patients (63%) experienced no discomfort and 58 (61%) reported being dry or markedly improved. Overall, 50 patients (53%) reported being very or predominantly satisfied.
Conclusions: Adjustable continence balloons seem to be a good alternative in the treatment of male urinary incontinence. Complications are mild and easily treated.
目的:本研究旨在评价丹麦使用ProACT尿失禁装置治疗压力性尿失禁的经验。材料与方法:将ProACT植入114例患者。资料采用前瞻性登记。主要终点为并发症、尿垫每日使用和24 h尿漏。向患者发放了一份评估症状和满意度的问卷。结果:术前和术后尿垫使用和尿漏数据分别为92例和90例。结果显示,24小时尿漏的中位数(352.5 vs 11 ml, p < 0.001)和每天使用尿垫的中位数(4.75 vs 2.25, p = 0.001)均有所减少。46例患者每天使用0-1块尿垫和/或每日尿漏小于8 g,对应于总干率为50%。72例(80%)患者尿漏减少> 50%。23例出现并发症。所有这些都是通过在门诊环境中移除设备并更换设备而成功治疗的。另外8名患者植入第三个气囊以进一步改善尿失禁。14名患者(12%)最终接受了人工括约肌或尿道吊带。60名患者(63%)没有感到不适,58名患者(61%)报告皮肤干燥或明显改善。总体而言,50名患者(53%)表示非常满意或基本满意。结论:可调式尿失禁气囊是治疗男性尿失禁的良好选择。并发症很轻微,很容易治疗。