Indirect medical education and disproportionate share adjustments to Medicare inpatient payment rates.

Nguyen Xuan Nguyen, Steven H Sheingold
{"title":"Indirect medical education and disproportionate share adjustments to Medicare inpatient payment rates.","authors":"Nguyen Xuan Nguyen,&nbsp;Steven H Sheingold","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The indirect medical education (IME) and disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustments to Medicare's prospective payment rates for inpatient services are generally intended to compensate hospitals for patient care costs related to teaching activities and care of low income populations. These adjustments were originally established based on the statistical relationships between IME and DSH and hospital costs. Due to a variety of policy considerations, the legislated levels of these adjustments may have deviated over time from these \"empirically justified levels,\" or simply, \"empirical levels.\" In this paper, we estimate the empirical levels of IME and DSH using 2006 hospital data and 2009 Medicare final payment rules. Our analyses suggest that the empirical level for IME would be much smaller than under current law-about one-third to one-half. Our analyses also support the DSH adjustment prescribed by the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA)--about one-quarter of the pre-ACA level. For IME, the estimates imply an increase in costs of 1.88% for each 10% increase in teaching intensity. For DSH, the estimates imply that costs would rise by 0.52% for each 10% increase in the low-income patient share for large urban hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010444/pdf/mmrr2011-001-04-a01.pdf","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The indirect medical education (IME) and disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustments to Medicare's prospective payment rates for inpatient services are generally intended to compensate hospitals for patient care costs related to teaching activities and care of low income populations. These adjustments were originally established based on the statistical relationships between IME and DSH and hospital costs. Due to a variety of policy considerations, the legislated levels of these adjustments may have deviated over time from these "empirically justified levels," or simply, "empirical levels." In this paper, we estimate the empirical levels of IME and DSH using 2006 hospital data and 2009 Medicare final payment rules. Our analyses suggest that the empirical level for IME would be much smaller than under current law-about one-third to one-half. Our analyses also support the DSH adjustment prescribed by the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA)--about one-quarter of the pre-ACA level. For IME, the estimates imply an increase in costs of 1.88% for each 10% increase in teaching intensity. For DSH, the estimates imply that costs would rise by 0.52% for each 10% increase in the low-income patient share for large urban hospitals.

间接医学教育和不成比例的份额调整医疗保险住院病人支付率。
间接医学教育(IME)和不成比例的医院份额(DSH)对医疗保险住院服务预期支付率的调整通常是为了补偿医院与教学活动和低收入人群护理相关的患者护理费用。这些调整最初是根据IME和DSH与医院费用之间的统计关系建立的。由于各种各样的政策考虑,这些调整的立法水平可能会随着时间的推移偏离这些“经验证明的水平”,或者简单地说,“经验水平”。本文使用2006年医院数据和2009年医疗保险最终支付规则估计了IME和DSH的经验水平。我们的分析表明,IME的经验水平将比现行法律规定的要小得多——大约三分之一到二分之一。我们的分析也支持2010年平价医疗法案(ACA)规定的DSH调整——大约是ACA之前水平的四分之一。对于IME来说,估计意味着教学强度每增加10%,成本就会增加1.88%。对于DSH,估计意味着大型城市医院的低收入患者比例每增加10%,成本就会上升0.52%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信