The impact of paradoxical comorbidities on risk-adjusted mortality of Medicare beneficiaries with cardiovascular disease.

Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin, Xin Lu, Peter Cram
{"title":"The impact of paradoxical comorbidities on risk-adjusted mortality of Medicare beneficiaries with cardiovascular disease.","authors":"Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin,&nbsp;Xin Lu,&nbsp;Peter Cram","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.001.03.a02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent uncertainty remains regarding assessments of patient comorbidity based on administrative data for mortality risk adjustment. Some models include comorbid conditions that are associated with improved mortality while other models exclude these so-called paradoxical conditions. The impact of these conditions on patient risk assessments is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends in the prevalence of conditions with a paradoxical (protective) relationship with mortality, and the impact of including these conditions on assessments of risk adjusted mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients age 65 and older admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during 1994 through 2005 were identified in Medicare Part A files. Comorbid conditions defined using a common algorithm were categorized as having a paradoxical or non-paradoxical relationship with 30-day mortality, based upon regression coefficients in multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For AMI, the proportion of patients with one or more paradoxical condition and one or more non-paradoxical condition increased by 24% and 3% respectively between 1994 and 2005. The odds of death for patients with one-or-more paradoxical comorbidities, relative to patients with no paradoxical comorbidity, declined from 0.69 to 0.54 over the study period. In contrast, the risk associated with having one or more non-paradoxical comorbidities increased from 2.66 to 4.62 for AMI. This pattern was even stronger for CABG. Risk adjustment models that included paradoxical comorbidities found larger improvements, in risk-adjusted mortality for AMI and CABG, over time than models that did not include paradoxical comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relationship between individual comorbid conditions and mortality is changing over time, with potential impact on estimates of hospital performance and trends in mortality. Development of a standard approach for handling conditions with a paradoxical relationship to mortality is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"1 3","pages":"E1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010616/pdf/mmrr2011-001-03-a02.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.03.a02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Persistent uncertainty remains regarding assessments of patient comorbidity based on administrative data for mortality risk adjustment. Some models include comorbid conditions that are associated with improved mortality while other models exclude these so-called paradoxical conditions. The impact of these conditions on patient risk assessments is unknown.

Objective: To examine trends in the prevalence of conditions with a paradoxical (protective) relationship with mortality, and the impact of including these conditions on assessments of risk adjusted mortality.

Methods: Patients age 65 and older admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during 1994 through 2005 were identified in Medicare Part A files. Comorbid conditions defined using a common algorithm were categorized as having a paradoxical or non-paradoxical relationship with 30-day mortality, based upon regression coefficients in multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: For AMI, the proportion of patients with one or more paradoxical condition and one or more non-paradoxical condition increased by 24% and 3% respectively between 1994 and 2005. The odds of death for patients with one-or-more paradoxical comorbidities, relative to patients with no paradoxical comorbidity, declined from 0.69 to 0.54 over the study period. In contrast, the risk associated with having one or more non-paradoxical comorbidities increased from 2.66 to 4.62 for AMI. This pattern was even stronger for CABG. Risk adjustment models that included paradoxical comorbidities found larger improvements, in risk-adjusted mortality for AMI and CABG, over time than models that did not include paradoxical comorbidities.

Conclusion: The relationship between individual comorbid conditions and mortality is changing over time, with potential impact on estimates of hospital performance and trends in mortality. Development of a standard approach for handling conditions with a paradoxical relationship to mortality is needed.

矛盾合并症对心血管疾病医疗保险受益人风险调整死亡率的影响。
背景:基于死亡风险调整的行政数据对患者合并症的评估仍然存在持续的不确定性。一些模型包括与死亡率提高相关的共病条件,而其他模型则排除这些所谓的矛盾条件。这些情况对患者风险评估的影响尚不清楚。目的:研究与死亡率存在矛盾(保护性)关系的疾病的流行趋势,以及纳入这些疾病对风险调整死亡率评估的影响。方法:在1994年至2005年期间,65岁及以上因急性心肌梗死(AMI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)住院的患者被纳入医疗保险A部分档案。根据多变量逻辑回归模型中的回归系数,使用通用算法定义的合并症与30天死亡率之间存在矛盾或非矛盾关系。结果:AMI患者出现一种或多种矛盾状况和一种或多种非矛盾状况的比例在1994 - 2005年间分别增加了24%和3%。在研究期间,与无矛盾合并症的患者相比,有一种或多种矛盾合并症患者的死亡几率从0.69下降到0.54。相比之下,AMI伴有一种或多种非悖论性合并症的风险从2.66增加到4.62。这种模式在CABG中更为明显。包括矛盾合并症的风险调整模型发现,随着时间的推移,AMI和CABG的风险调整死亡率比不包括矛盾合并症的模型有更大的改善。结论:个体合并症与死亡率之间的关系随着时间的推移而变化,对医院绩效和死亡率趋势的估计有潜在的影响。需要制定一种标准方法来处理与死亡率有矛盾关系的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信