Identifying potentially eligible subjects for research: paper-based logs versus the hospital administrative database.

L A Magee, K Massey, P von Dadelszen, M Fazio, B Payne, R Liston
{"title":"Identifying potentially eligible subjects for research: paper-based logs versus the hospital administrative database.","authors":"L A Magee,&nbsp;K Massey,&nbsp;P von Dadelszen,&nbsp;M Fazio,&nbsp;B Payne,&nbsp;R Liston","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Canadian Perinatal Network (CPN) is a national database focused on threatened very pre-term birth. Women with one or more conditions most commonly associated with very pre-term birth are included if admitted to a participating tertiary perinatal unit at 22 weeks and 0 days to 28 weeks and 6 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, we compared traditional paper-based ward logs and a search of the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) electronic database of inpatient discharges to identify patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 244 women potentially eligible for inclusion in the CPN admitted between April and December 2007. Of the 155 eligible women entered into the CPN database, each method identified a similar number of unique records (142 and 147) not ascertained by the other: 10 (6.4%) by CIHI search and 5 (3.2%) by ward log review. However, CIHI search achieved these results after reviewing fewer records (206 vs. 223) in less time (0.67 vs. 13.6 hours for ward logs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Either method is appropriate for identification of potential research subjects using gestational age criteria. Although electronic methods are less time-consuming, they cannot be performed until after the patient is discharged and records and charts are reviewed. Each method's advantages and disadvantages will dictate use for a specific project.</p>","PeriodicalId":49222,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"32 1","pages":"43-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Canadian Perinatal Network (CPN) is a national database focused on threatened very pre-term birth. Women with one or more conditions most commonly associated with very pre-term birth are included if admitted to a participating tertiary perinatal unit at 22 weeks and 0 days to 28 weeks and 6 days.

Methods: At BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, we compared traditional paper-based ward logs and a search of the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) electronic database of inpatient discharges to identify patients.

Results: The study identified 244 women potentially eligible for inclusion in the CPN admitted between April and December 2007. Of the 155 eligible women entered into the CPN database, each method identified a similar number of unique records (142 and 147) not ascertained by the other: 10 (6.4%) by CIHI search and 5 (3.2%) by ward log review. However, CIHI search achieved these results after reviewing fewer records (206 vs. 223) in less time (0.67 vs. 13.6 hours for ward logs).

Conclusion: Either method is appropriate for identification of potential research subjects using gestational age criteria. Although electronic methods are less time-consuming, they cannot be performed until after the patient is discharged and records and charts are reviewed. Each method's advantages and disadvantages will dictate use for a specific project.

确定潜在的合格研究对象:基于纸张的日志与医院管理数据库。
简介:加拿大围产期网络(CPN)是一个专注于威胁极早产的国家数据库。患有一种或多种最常与极早产相关的疾病的妇女,如果在22周零至28周零6天入住参与的第三次围产单位,也包括在内。方法:在不列颠哥伦比亚省妇女医院和保健中心,我们比较了传统的纸质病房日志和加拿大卫生信息研究所(CIHI)住院出院电子数据库的搜索,以确定患者。结果:在2007年4月至12月期间,该研究确定了244名可能符合纳入CPN的妇女。在进入CPN数据库的155名符合条件的妇女中,每种方法确定的唯一记录数量相似(142和147),而不是由另一种方法确定:10(6.4%)通过CIHI搜索,5(3.2%)通过病房日志审查。然而,CIHI搜索在更短的时间内(病房日志0.67小时对13.6小时)审查了更少的记录(206对223)后获得了这些结果。结论:两种方法均适用于使用胎龄标准确定潜在研究对象。虽然电子方法较省时,但必须在病人出院并检查病历和图表后才能使用。每种方法的优点和缺点将决定特定项目的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信