Morphometric analysis of DNA ploidy and nuclear cell cycle regulators in Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor.

Isidro Machado, Amparo Ruiz-Sauri, José A López-Guerrero, Antonio Llombart-Bosch
{"title":"Morphometric analysis of DNA ploidy and nuclear cell cycle regulators in Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor.","authors":"Isidro Machado,&nbsp;Amparo Ruiz-Sauri,&nbsp;José A López-Guerrero,&nbsp;Antonio Llombart-Bosch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the morphometry of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor, compare qualitative and quantitative methods using immunohistochemical markers, and evaluate the utility of morphometry in the differential diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) subtypes and small round cell tumors (SRCTs) of bone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A total of 111 genetically confirmed ESFTs and 19 SRCTs were evaluated for DNA content and immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki-67 using morphometric analysis. Qualitative evaluation was performed using light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the ESFT cases, 81% were aneuploid. Overall, no statistical differences were observed regarding the nuclear area or roundness between ESFT and SRCT and between ESFT subtypes. p53 and p16 revealed high concordance between qualitative and quantitative methods and a lower agreement using Ki-67. Nuclear roundness showed prognostic significance in the univariate analysis for proportional risk survival but no independent prognostically significant variable was obtained after multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA content, nuclear area, or roundness cannot distinguish between ESFT and other SRCT. Morphometric analysis cannot discriminate between ESFT histologic subtypes. Quantitative measurements of IHC parameters are more precise than conventional measurements, particularly in discrepant cases (--vs. +, ++ vs. +++). DNA ploidy is not a prognostic factor in ESFT.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"33 2","pages":"101-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the morphometry of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor, compare qualitative and quantitative methods using immunohistochemical markers, and evaluate the utility of morphometry in the differential diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) subtypes and small round cell tumors (SRCTs) of bone.

Study design: A total of 111 genetically confirmed ESFTs and 19 SRCTs were evaluated for DNA content and immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki-67 using morphometric analysis. Qualitative evaluation was performed using light microscopy.

Results: Of the ESFT cases, 81% were aneuploid. Overall, no statistical differences were observed regarding the nuclear area or roundness between ESFT and SRCT and between ESFT subtypes. p53 and p16 revealed high concordance between qualitative and quantitative methods and a lower agreement using Ki-67. Nuclear roundness showed prognostic significance in the univariate analysis for proportional risk survival but no independent prognostically significant variable was obtained after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: DNA content, nuclear area, or roundness cannot distinguish between ESFT and other SRCT. Morphometric analysis cannot discriminate between ESFT histologic subtypes. Quantitative measurements of IHC parameters are more precise than conventional measurements, particularly in discrepant cases (--vs. +, ++ vs. +++). DNA ploidy is not a prognostic factor in ESFT.

Ewing肉瘤/原始神经外胚层肿瘤DNA倍体和核细胞周期调控因子的形态计量学分析。
目的:研究DNA倍体形态学作为预后因素,比较免疫组织化学标志物定性和定量方法,评价形态学在骨尤文氏肉瘤家族肿瘤(ESFT)亚型和骨小圆细胞肿瘤(srct)鉴别诊断中的应用价值。研究设计:使用形态计量学分析,对111例基因证实的ESFTs和19例srct进行DNA含量和p53、p16和Ki-67的免疫组化评估。光镜下进行定性评价。结果:ESFT病例中81%为非整倍体。总的来说,ESFT和SRCT以及ESFT亚型之间在核面积或圆度方面没有统计学差异。p53和p16在定性和定量方法上的一致性较高,而Ki-67方法的一致性较低。核圆度在比例风险生存的单因素分析中显示预后意义,但在多因素分析后未获得具有独立预后意义的变量。结论:DNA含量、核面积、圆度不能区分ESFT与其他SRCT。形态计量学分析不能区分ESFT的组织学亚型。IHC参数的定量测量比常规测量更精确,特别是在差异病例中(- vs。+, ++ vs +++)。DNA倍性不是ESFT的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信