Intra-arterial administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) causes more intracranial bleeding than does intravenous rt-PA in a transient rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model.

R Christian Crumrine, Victor J Marder, G McLeod Taylor, Joseph C Lamanna, Constantinos P Tsipis, Philip Scuderi, Stephen R Petteway, Vikram Arora
{"title":"Intra-arterial administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) causes more intracranial bleeding than does intravenous rt-PA in a transient rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model.","authors":"R Christian Crumrine,&nbsp;Victor J Marder,&nbsp;G McLeod Taylor,&nbsp;Joseph C Lamanna,&nbsp;Constantinos P Tsipis,&nbsp;Philip Scuderi,&nbsp;Stephen R Petteway,&nbsp;Vikram Arora","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-3-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-arterial (IA) administration of rt-PA for ischemic stroke has the potential for greater thrombolytic efficacy, especially for a large thrombus in the M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a concern with IA or intravenous (IV) administration especially as the therapeutic window is extended. However, because IA administration delivers a higher local concentration of agent, the incidence and severity of ICH may be greater than with similar doses IV. We investigated the safety of rt-PA administration by IA compared to IV infusion following 6 hours of MCA occlusion (MCAo) with reflow in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male SHRs were subjected to 6 hours MCAo with 18 hours reflow using a snare ligature model. They were treated with IA saline, IA rt-PA (1, 5, 10, 30 mg/kg), or IV rt-PA (10 and 30 mg/kg) by a 10 to 60 minute infusion beginning approximately 1 minute before reflow. The rats were recovered for 24 hours after MCAo onset at which time Bleeding Score, infarct volume, and Modified Bederson Score were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater hemorrhagic transformation occurred with 10 and 30 mg/kg rt-PA administered IA than IV. The IV 10 mg/kg rt-PA dosage induced significantly less bleeding than did the 1 or 5 mg/kg IA groups. No significant increase in infarct volume was observed after IA or IV treatment. Rats treated with 30 mg/kg rt-PA by either the IA or IV route had greater neurological dysfunction compared to all other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administration of rt-PA by the IA route following 6 hours of MCAo results in greater ICH and worse functional recovery than comparable dosages IV. Significantly greater bleeding was observed when the IA dose was a tenth of the IV dose. The increased bleeding did not translate in larger infarct volumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-3-10","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-3-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Intra-arterial (IA) administration of rt-PA for ischemic stroke has the potential for greater thrombolytic efficacy, especially for a large thrombus in the M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a concern with IA or intravenous (IV) administration especially as the therapeutic window is extended. However, because IA administration delivers a higher local concentration of agent, the incidence and severity of ICH may be greater than with similar doses IV. We investigated the safety of rt-PA administration by IA compared to IV infusion following 6 hours of MCA occlusion (MCAo) with reflow in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR).

Methods: Male SHRs were subjected to 6 hours MCAo with 18 hours reflow using a snare ligature model. They were treated with IA saline, IA rt-PA (1, 5, 10, 30 mg/kg), or IV rt-PA (10 and 30 mg/kg) by a 10 to 60 minute infusion beginning approximately 1 minute before reflow. The rats were recovered for 24 hours after MCAo onset at which time Bleeding Score, infarct volume, and Modified Bederson Score were measured.

Results: Greater hemorrhagic transformation occurred with 10 and 30 mg/kg rt-PA administered IA than IV. The IV 10 mg/kg rt-PA dosage induced significantly less bleeding than did the 1 or 5 mg/kg IA groups. No significant increase in infarct volume was observed after IA or IV treatment. Rats treated with 30 mg/kg rt-PA by either the IA or IV route had greater neurological dysfunction compared to all other groups.

Conclusions: Administration of rt-PA by the IA route following 6 hours of MCAo results in greater ICH and worse functional recovery than comparable dosages IV. Significantly greater bleeding was observed when the IA dose was a tenth of the IV dose. The increased bleeding did not translate in larger infarct volumes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)在短暂性大鼠大脑中动脉闭塞模型中引起比静脉注射rt-PA更多的颅内出血。
背景:动脉内(IA)给药rt-PA治疗缺血性卒中具有更大的溶栓效果,特别是对于大脑中动脉(MCA) M1或M2段的大血栓。颅内出血(ICH)是IA或静脉(IV)给药的关注,特别是随着治疗窗口期的延长。然而,由于IA给药的局部药物浓度较高,脑出血的发生率和严重程度可能高于相同剂量的静脉注射。我们研究了自发性高血压大鼠(SHR) MCA闭塞(MCAo) 6小时后,通过IA给药rt-PA与静脉输液的安全性。方法:采用圈套结扎模型,对男性SHRs进行6小时MCAo和18小时回流。他们分别接受IA生理盐水、IA rt-PA(1、5、10、30 mg/kg)或静脉rt-PA(10和30 mg/kg)治疗,在回流前约1分钟开始输注10至60分钟。MCAo发病24小时后恢复,测定出血评分、梗死体积和改良Bederson评分。结果:注射10和30 mg/kg rt-PA组出血转化明显大于静脉注射组,注射10 mg/kg rt-PA组出血明显少于静脉注射1或5 mg/kg IA组。注射或静脉注射后梗死面积未见明显增加。与所有其他组相比,通过IA或IV途径给药30 mg/kg rt-PA的大鼠神经功能障碍更大。结论:与同等剂量的静脉给药相比,在MCAo 6小时后通过IA途径给药rt-PA会导致更大的脑出血和更差的功能恢复。当IA剂量为静脉剂量的十分之一时,观察到明显更大的出血。增加的出血并没有转化为更大的梗死体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信