Prognostic value of lymph-node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy following previous oncological treatment for bladder cancer.

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, Benedicte Parm Ulhøi, Klaus Møller-Ernst Jensen
{"title":"Prognostic value of lymph-node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy following previous oncological treatment for bladder cancer.","authors":"Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen,&nbsp;Benedicte Parm Ulhøi,&nbsp;Klaus Møller-Ernst Jensen","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2011.609832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prognostic value of lymph-node dissection (LND) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) following previous oncological treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Perioperative findings and recurrence patterns of 46 patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer were evaluated. Twenty-six patients underwent salvage cystectomy because of local bladder cancer recurrence following intended curative external beam radiotherapy; 20 patients underwent preoperative chemotherapy because of non-regional lymph-node metastases (10 patients), clinically fixed primary tumour (cT4b) (eight patients) or pulmonary metastases (two patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difficulties with LND because of fibrous tissue were accounted in the majority of previously irradiated patients. No metastatic lymph nodes were found within the irradiation field at the time of surgery or during follow-up. Two- and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 47% and 31%, respectively. In patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy because of lymph-node metastasis, three patients (30%) had vital tumour cells within the removed lymph-nodes. Two- and 5-year DSS was 67% and 50%, respectively. Despite preoperative chemotherapy, all patients with cT4b tumours and previously diagnosed pulmonary metastases died because of recurrent disease within 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LND in the previously irradiated pelvis may be difficult and remains controversial. Because of a high risk of vital tumours cells within the removed lymph nodes despite chemotherapy, extended LND should be performed in patients with non-regional lymph-node metastasis following preoperative chemotherapy. In patients with fixed tumours and minimal response to chemotherapy and in patients with visceral metastases, RC should be attempted for palliative reasons only.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"45 6","pages":"436-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.609832","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.609832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of lymph-node dissection (LND) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) following previous oncological treatment.

Material and methods: Perioperative findings and recurrence patterns of 46 patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer were evaluated. Twenty-six patients underwent salvage cystectomy because of local bladder cancer recurrence following intended curative external beam radiotherapy; 20 patients underwent preoperative chemotherapy because of non-regional lymph-node metastases (10 patients), clinically fixed primary tumour (cT4b) (eight patients) or pulmonary metastases (two patients).

Results: Difficulties with LND because of fibrous tissue were accounted in the majority of previously irradiated patients. No metastatic lymph nodes were found within the irradiation field at the time of surgery or during follow-up. Two- and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 47% and 31%, respectively. In patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy because of lymph-node metastasis, three patients (30%) had vital tumour cells within the removed lymph-nodes. Two- and 5-year DSS was 67% and 50%, respectively. Despite preoperative chemotherapy, all patients with cT4b tumours and previously diagnosed pulmonary metastases died because of recurrent disease within 2 years.

Conclusions: LND in the previously irradiated pelvis may be difficult and remains controversial. Because of a high risk of vital tumours cells within the removed lymph nodes despite chemotherapy, extended LND should be performed in patients with non-regional lymph-node metastasis following preoperative chemotherapy. In patients with fixed tumours and minimal response to chemotherapy and in patients with visceral metastases, RC should be attempted for palliative reasons only.

既往肿瘤治疗后行根治性膀胱切除术患者淋巴结清扫的预后价值。
目的:探讨淋巴结清扫术(LND)对既往肿瘤治疗后行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者的预后价值。材料与方法:对46例膀胱癌行RC手术患者的围手术期表现及复发情况进行分析。26例膀胱癌患者在接受体外放射治疗后因局部膀胱癌复发而行补救性膀胱切除术;20例患者因非区域淋巴结转移(10例)、临床固定原发肿瘤(cT4b)(8例)或肺转移(2例)接受术前化疗。结果:由于纤维组织导致的LND困难在大多数先前放疗的患者中占主导地位。在手术时或随访期间,照射范围内未发现转移性淋巴结。2年和5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)分别为47%和31%。在因淋巴结转移而接受术前化疗的患者中,有3例(30%)患者在切除的淋巴结内存在重要的肿瘤细胞。2年和5年DSS分别为67%和50%。尽管术前化疗,所有cT4b肿瘤和先前诊断为肺转移的患者在2年内因疾病复发而死亡。结论:在先前照射过的骨盆中进行LND可能是困难的,并且仍然存在争议。由于化疗后切除的淋巴结内存在重要肿瘤细胞的风险很高,术前化疗后非区域淋巴结转移的患者应行延长淋巴结清扫术。对于肿瘤固定且对化疗反应最小的患者和有内脏转移的患者,应仅出于姑息性原因尝试RC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信