Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effectiveness study in 27 patients.

Urological Research Pub Date : 2012-08-01 Epub Date: 2011-08-11 DOI:10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3
Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar, Haluk Söylemez, Yasar Bozkurt, Necmettin Penbegül, Murat Atar
{"title":"Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effectiveness study in 27 patients.","authors":"Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar,&nbsp;Haluk Söylemez,&nbsp;Yasar Bozkurt,&nbsp;Necmettin Penbegül,&nbsp;Murat Atar","doi":"10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim of study was to present costs of forgotten ureteral stents extraction so as to distract attentions of the urologists on this issue. Medical files of 27 accessible patients who referred to our clinics between 2001 and 2010 because of forgotten ureteral stent were retrospectively analyzed. The indwelling time of double-j stents (DJS) was calculated from the time of its insertion. Costs related to radiological investigations, all invasive, and noninvasive interventions, duration of hospital stay, and medical treatments used were calculated. These estimations were based on 2010 prices determined by Turkey Ministry of Health. Mean age of the patients was 31.2 (8-86 years) years. Mean indwelling time of ureteral DJSs was 36.7 months (14-84 months). Seventy-one [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), n = 26; invasive/noninvasive interventions, n = 32] procedures were applied for 27 patients. In six patients without incrustation, after a single session of ESWL DJSs could be removed cystoscopically. A various combination of a multimodal therapy was used for other 21 patients. Total financial burden of 27 patients was US $ 34,300. Cost of treatment was estimated to be 6.9-fold (1.8- to 21-fold) higher than an average timely stent extraction. Financial burden of the treatments increased in parallel with the duration of the stent retention (p = 0.001). Management of forgotten DJS is time consuming, difficult, complicated, risky, and costly. Therefore; financial burden, increased labour loss, and impaired quality of life brought by the application of these modalities must not be forgotten.</p>","PeriodicalId":23412,"journal":{"name":"Urological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Aim of study was to present costs of forgotten ureteral stents extraction so as to distract attentions of the urologists on this issue. Medical files of 27 accessible patients who referred to our clinics between 2001 and 2010 because of forgotten ureteral stent were retrospectively analyzed. The indwelling time of double-j stents (DJS) was calculated from the time of its insertion. Costs related to radiological investigations, all invasive, and noninvasive interventions, duration of hospital stay, and medical treatments used were calculated. These estimations were based on 2010 prices determined by Turkey Ministry of Health. Mean age of the patients was 31.2 (8-86 years) years. Mean indwelling time of ureteral DJSs was 36.7 months (14-84 months). Seventy-one [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), n = 26; invasive/noninvasive interventions, n = 32] procedures were applied for 27 patients. In six patients without incrustation, after a single session of ESWL DJSs could be removed cystoscopically. A various combination of a multimodal therapy was used for other 21 patients. Total financial burden of 27 patients was US $ 34,300. Cost of treatment was estimated to be 6.9-fold (1.8- to 21-fold) higher than an average timely stent extraction. Financial burden of the treatments increased in parallel with the duration of the stent retention (p = 0.001). Management of forgotten DJS is time consuming, difficult, complicated, risky, and costly. Therefore; financial burden, increased labour loss, and impaired quality of life brought by the application of these modalities must not be forgotten.

遗忘输尿管支架的治疗:到底要花多少钱?27例患者的成本-效果研究。
本研究的目的是介绍遗忘输尿管支架取出的成本,以转移泌尿科医生对这一问题的关注。回顾性分析了2001 - 2010年间27例因遗忘输尿管支架就诊的可及患者的医疗档案。双j型支架(DJS)的留置时间由其插入时间计算。计算与放射检查、所有侵入性和非侵入性干预、住院时间和使用的药物治疗相关的费用。这些估计数是根据土耳其卫生部确定的2010年价格计算的。患者平均年龄31.2岁(8 ~ 86岁)。输尿管DJSs平均留置时间36.7个月(14 ~ 84个月)。体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL) 71例,26例;27例患者采用有创/无创干预措施(n = 32)。在6例无结痂的患者中,单次ESWL后可经膀胱镜切除DJSs。另外21例患者采用了多模式治疗的多种组合。27名患者的总经济负担为34,300美元。治疗费用估计比平均及时支架取出高出6.9倍(1.8- 21倍)。治疗的经济负担随着支架保留时间的延长而增加(p = 0.001)。管理被遗忘的dj是耗时、困难、复杂、有风险和昂贵的。因此;不能忘记这些方式的应用所带来的财政负担、劳动力损失的增加和生活质量的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urological Research
Urological Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信