Differing time dependencies of object recognition memory impairments produced by nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic antagonism in perirhinal cortex.

IF 2.2
Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2011-06-21 Print Date: 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.2274911
Chris J Tinsley, Nadine S Fontaine-Palmer, Maria Vincent, Emma P E Endean, John P Aggleton, Malcolm W Brown, E Clea Warburton
{"title":"Differing time dependencies of object recognition memory impairments produced by nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic antagonism in perirhinal cortex.","authors":"Chris J Tinsley, Nadine S Fontaine-Palmer, Maria Vincent, Emma P E Endean, John P Aggleton, Malcolm W Brown, E Clea Warburton","doi":"10.1101/lm.2274911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The roles of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex in object recognition memory were compared. Rats' discrimination of a novel object preference test (NOP) test was measured after either systemic or local infusion into the perirhinal cortex of the nicotinic receptor antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), which targets alpha-7 (α7) amongst other nicotinic receptors or the muscarinic receptor antagonists scopolamine, AFDX-384, and pirenzepine. Methyllycaconitine administered systemically or intraperirhinally before acquisition impaired recognition memory tested after a 24-h, but not a 20-min delay. In contrast, all three muscarinic antagonists produced a similar, unusual pattern of impairment with amnesia after a 20-min delay, but remembrance after a 24-h delay. Thus, the amnesic effects of nicotinic and muscarinic antagonism were doubly dissociated across the 20-min and 24-h delays. The same pattern of shorter-term but not longer-term memory impairment was found for scopolamine whether the object preference test was carried out in a square arena or a Y-maze and whether rats of the Dark Agouti or Lister-hooded strains were used. Coinfusion of MLA and either scopolamine or AFDX-384 produced an impairment profile matching that for MLA. Hence, the antagonists did not act additively when coadministered. These findings establish an important role in recognition memory for both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex, and provide a challenge to simple ideas about the role of cholinergic processes in recognition memory: The effects of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonism are neither independent nor additive.</p>","PeriodicalId":520703,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"484-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125612/pdf/TinsleyLM22749.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.2274911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The roles of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex in object recognition memory were compared. Rats' discrimination of a novel object preference test (NOP) test was measured after either systemic or local infusion into the perirhinal cortex of the nicotinic receptor antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), which targets alpha-7 (α7) amongst other nicotinic receptors or the muscarinic receptor antagonists scopolamine, AFDX-384, and pirenzepine. Methyllycaconitine administered systemically or intraperirhinally before acquisition impaired recognition memory tested after a 24-h, but not a 20-min delay. In contrast, all three muscarinic antagonists produced a similar, unusual pattern of impairment with amnesia after a 20-min delay, but remembrance after a 24-h delay. Thus, the amnesic effects of nicotinic and muscarinic antagonism were doubly dissociated across the 20-min and 24-h delays. The same pattern of shorter-term but not longer-term memory impairment was found for scopolamine whether the object preference test was carried out in a square arena or a Y-maze and whether rats of the Dark Agouti or Lister-hooded strains were used. Coinfusion of MLA and either scopolamine or AFDX-384 produced an impairment profile matching that for MLA. Hence, the antagonists did not act additively when coadministered. These findings establish an important role in recognition memory for both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex, and provide a challenge to simple ideas about the role of cholinergic processes in recognition memory: The effects of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonism are neither independent nor additive.

烟碱胆碱能拮抗剂和毒蕈碱胆碱能拮抗剂在嗅周皮层引起的物体识别记忆障碍的不同时间依赖性。
比较了嗅周皮质毒蕈碱受体和烟碱胆碱能受体在物体识别记忆中的作用。将烟碱受体拮抗剂甲基莱卡乌碱(MLA)全身或局部输注到嗅周皮层后,测量了大鼠对新对象偏好测试(NOP)的辨别能力。甲基莱卡乌碱(MLA)在其他烟碱受体或毒碱受体拮抗剂东莨菪碱、AFDX-384和吡renzepine中靶向α -7 (α7)。在获得前全身或经鼻内给予甲基莱卡乌碱,24小时后测试识别记忆受损,但不延迟20分钟。相比之下,所有三种毒蕈碱拮抗剂在延迟20分钟后产生了类似的、不寻常的损害模式,并导致失忆,但在延迟24小时后产生记忆。因此,烟碱和毒蕈碱拮抗剂的遗忘效应在20分钟和24小时的延迟中被双重分离。无论物体偏好测试是在正方形竞技场还是y形迷宫中进行,无论使用的是Dark Agouti还是Lister-hooded品系的大鼠,都发现东莨菪碱对短期记忆损害的模式是相同的,而不是长期记忆损害。MLA与东莨菪碱或AFDX-384的联合输注产生了与MLA相匹配的损伤谱。因此,当共给药时,拮抗剂不会起加性作用。这些发现确立了烟碱和毒蕈碱胆碱能受体在识别记忆中的重要作用,并对胆碱能过程在识别记忆中的作用的简单观点提出了挑战:毒蕈碱和烟碱的拮抗作用既不是独立的,也不是相加的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书