Félix Grases, Antonia Costa-Bauzá, Rafel M Prieto, Miguel Arrabal, Tomás De Haro, Juan A Lancina, Carmen Barbuzano, Sergi Colom, Joaquín Riera, Joan Perelló, Bernat Isern, Pilar Sanchis, Antonio Conte, Fernando Barragan, Isabel Gomila
{"title":"Urinary lithogenesis risk tests: comparison of a commercial kit and a laboratory prototype test.","authors":"Félix Grases, Antonia Costa-Bauzá, Rafel M Prieto, Miguel Arrabal, Tomás De Haro, Juan A Lancina, Carmen Barbuzano, Sergi Colom, Joaquín Riera, Joan Perelló, Bernat Isern, Pilar Sanchis, Antonio Conte, Fernando Barragan, Isabel Gomila","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2011.584551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Renal stone formation is a multifactorial process depending in part on urine composition. Other parameters relate to structural or pathological features of the kidney. To date, routine laboratory estimation of urolithiasis risk has been based on determination of urinary composition. This process requires collection of at least two 24 h urine samples, which is tedious for patients. The most important feature of urinary lithogenic risk is the balance between various urinary parameters, although unknown factors may be involved. The objective of this study was to compare data obtained using a commercial kit with those of a laboratory prototype, using a multicentre approach, to validate the utility of these methods in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A simple new commercial test (NefroPlus®; Sarstedt AG & Co., Nümbrecht, Germany) evaluating the capacity of urine to crystallize calcium salts, and thus permitting detection of patients at risk for stone development, was compared with a prototype test previously described by this group. Urine of 64 volunteers produced during the night was used in these comparisons. The commercial test was also used to evaluate urine samples of 83 subjects in one of three hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods were essentially in complete agreement (98%) with respect to test results. The multicentre data were: sensitivity 94.7%; specificity 76.9%; positive predictive value (lithogenic urine) 90.0%; negative predictive value (non-lithogenic urine) 87.0%; test efficacy 89.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new commercial NefroPlus test offers fast and cheap evaluation of the overall risk of development of urinary calcium-containing calculi.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"45 5","pages":"312-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.584551","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.584551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Objective: Renal stone formation is a multifactorial process depending in part on urine composition. Other parameters relate to structural or pathological features of the kidney. To date, routine laboratory estimation of urolithiasis risk has been based on determination of urinary composition. This process requires collection of at least two 24 h urine samples, which is tedious for patients. The most important feature of urinary lithogenic risk is the balance between various urinary parameters, although unknown factors may be involved. The objective of this study was to compare data obtained using a commercial kit with those of a laboratory prototype, using a multicentre approach, to validate the utility of these methods in routine clinical practice.
Material and methods: A simple new commercial test (NefroPlus®; Sarstedt AG & Co., Nümbrecht, Germany) evaluating the capacity of urine to crystallize calcium salts, and thus permitting detection of patients at risk for stone development, was compared with a prototype test previously described by this group. Urine of 64 volunteers produced during the night was used in these comparisons. The commercial test was also used to evaluate urine samples of 83 subjects in one of three hospitals.
Results: Both methods were essentially in complete agreement (98%) with respect to test results. The multicentre data were: sensitivity 94.7%; specificity 76.9%; positive predictive value (lithogenic urine) 90.0%; negative predictive value (non-lithogenic urine) 87.0%; test efficacy 89.2%.
Conclusion: The new commercial NefroPlus test offers fast and cheap evaluation of the overall risk of development of urinary calcium-containing calculi.
目的:肾结石的形成是一个多因素的过程,部分取决于尿液成分。其他参数与肾脏的结构或病理特征有关。迄今为止,尿石症风险的常规实验室估计是基于尿液成分的测定。这个过程需要收集至少两个24小时的尿液样本,这对患者来说是繁琐的。尿结石风险最重要的特征是各种尿参数之间的平衡,尽管可能涉及未知因素。本研究的目的是比较使用商业试剂盒和实验室原型获得的数据,使用多中心方法,以验证这些方法在常规临床实践中的效用。材料和方法:一种简单的新型商业测试(NefroPlus®;Sarstedt AG & Co., n mbrecht,德国)评估尿液结晶钙盐的能力,从而允许检测有结石发展风险的患者,与该小组先前描述的原型测试进行了比较。64名志愿者的夜间尿液被用于这些比较。商业测试还被用于评估三家医院之一的83名受试者的尿液样本。结果:两种方法与试验结果基本完全一致(98%)。多中心数据:敏感性94.7%;特异性76.9%;阳性预测值(产石尿)90.0%;阴性预测值(非结石尿)87.0%;试验有效率89.2%。结论:新的商业化NefroPlus检测提供了快速、廉价的尿含钙结石总体发展风险评估。